【禁言博客】墙里扔出的一根骨头
【新唐人2011年8月1日讯】【禁言博客 】墙里扔出的一根骨头。
墙里扔出的一根骨头
作家李承鹏，对央视主持人倪萍当选"共和国脊梁"评论说：把国家和政府当父母，为了
不给父母添乱，就从不在两会上投反对票的倪萍，获得了脊梁的殊荣，但我认为：倪萍
患了颈椎病。
我觉得把国家和政府当父母，是一个很欠（贱）的说法。通俗点说 国家就是保镖,政府
就是物管，是纳税人聘来的，为不给保安和物业添乱，哪怕它们做得再差，也不投反对
票，这种逻辑，一定导致"你到底是为党说话，还是为老百姓说话"这类的励志名言及墓
志铭言，教育出更多的软骨头而不是脊梁。
所以我反对从不投反对票的倪萍是"共和国脊梁"，我不认为这么说有什么不对，不为老
百姓说话的代表，即使是脊梁，也是颈椎病的七，而不是迎风招展的一。
这个国家，总有这么一群人，他自己装看不见弊端，还不许别人看见。
他从不投反对票，还反对别人投反对票。因为他凭藉这个方法赚到很多，上边有大佬儿
罩着，下边有脑残的欢呼。到后来，他不再是当初那个，只是有些傻气的人，而成为精
明的帮凶，他其实确实知道自己要什么，怎么要。倘若你发现了这些技巧，他会深情地
望着你说：呀，我只是一个孩子，想帮父母操点心。
好人倪萍不是脊梁，只是伎俩，因为这么个伎俩，高堂之上，本来有些心虚的父母就坦
然了：有这么一群代表民意的脊梁，油价就不用降了，房价也不算太高，总之一切都是
发展中必然遇到的问题嘛。
倪萍在微博中，教我要厚道、善良。我觉得最厚道的是帮人民说话，而不是成为两会上
永恒不倒的"同意牌"假肢。
这国家的人民被"善良"害了几千年了。倪姐夸我散文写得好，这不值一提，并且这国家
已经让我没心情写散文了，我写的《李可乐抗拆记》比所有的抒情散文都好。因此交换
彼此的书就不必了，我俩不是一路人，你我的区别，就是《李可乐抗拆记》和《姥姥语
录》的区别，这不是两本书，是两个中国。
不如你带我去姥姥的菜市场，我带你去拆迁现场，看看咱俩谁先崩溃，然后你在两会
上，反对一次父母，我在文章里表扬一次父母。倪，敢吗？
最后，我对脊梁是这么看的：脊梁是人体最重要的中枢神经系统，实现大脑指挥屁股。
如果屁股指挥大脑，不叫脊梁，当了一辈子代表，连句能担当的话，都不敢说，这脊
梁，最多也就是野夫说的，一根从墙里头扔出来的骨头。
一只戴上就能强奸这个民族的避孕套
媒体报导说，贵州毕节阿市中学，26岁的女教师周琴报警说，自己酒醉后，被当地国土
资源管理所所长王忠贵强奸。警官钟显聪说："戴避孕套不算强奸"，劝其私了。检察院
也以证据不足为理由，让公安机关补充侦查。事件被曝光后，王忠贵因涉嫌强奸被逮
捕。
网上有一篇署名李立君的文章评论说：诡异的体制下，总会上演一些荒诞的喜剧。从来
没有法律规定："戴避孕套就不算强奸"。但没有规定，不代表没有"龟腚"，你看不
到，它却存在，中国人终于明白了，那叫潜规则。
如果媒体没报导的话，事情会是什么样儿呢？设想一下,结果是：王忠贵依然当他的所
长，享受着避孕套带给他的福利；毕节市人民检察院门前的国徽依然烁烁发光，只是被
套上了一层白色的胶状物，国徽从此失去了生育能力。
王忠贵已经被逮捕了，我们却悲哀的发现，如果没有媒体的报导，沉重的大众，竟然会
输给一只轻薄的避孕套。这不是一只普通的避孕套，这是一只，谁戴上就能强奸这个民
族的避孕套。表面上一片盛世的景象，事实上，我们整个民族已经被它强奸着，这只套
子不被打破，谁都逃不了，不管你是男人还是女人。2011-08-01
08:07:55http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/08/01/a567501.html.-【禁言博客】墙
里扔出的一根骨头.html
2011年7月31日星期日
【禁闻】人性与党性 媒体与禁令
【禁闻】人性与党性 媒体与禁令
【新唐人2011年8月1日讯】温州〝动力火车〞撞毁事故29号〝头七〞，中国大陆全国多
家报纸不约而同，准备好许多版位报导事件，并悼念死难者，但却在中宣部的禁令下撤
版，有些报章以近乎〝开天窗〞方式，表示不满。不过，仍有大批媒体抗命。其中，《
经济观察报》以八个版面的〝特别报导〞，详细分析了〝温州动车事故〞。
从7月30号开始，〝温州动车追撞事故〞的相关报导，进入噤声期。
29号晚9点左右，中共政治局常委李长春长期控制的〝中宣部〞，连续下达3道封杀
令，对于大陆媒体报导温州动车事故，〝除正面报导和权威部门发布的动态消息外，不
再做任何报导，不发任何评论。〞
一名广州报社的资深编辑透露：当晚，百家报纸在撤版，千位记者被毙稿。
据了解，《21世纪经济报导》和财经周报《中国经营报》接到禁令后，各自撤下8个相
关版面；《新京报》、浙江的《钱江晚报》和西安《华商报》等也都撤下了原本准备好
的版面。
中宣部的禁令引起了大陆媒体的强烈反应。上海《青年报》、《东方早报》和广州《南
方都市报》等，都以〝开天窗〞的方式表达不满。此外，有多家报社的编辑在微博上贴
出了被撤下的版面，也有记者在个人微薄上转播再也无法上版的新闻。
不过，中共当局镇压舆论的铁腕作风，反而引爆中国近年罕见的"媒体抗命潮"。
上海《青年报》30号头版，是以获救的小女孩伊伊笑脸图片，配以"伊伊，一定要好好
长大"的文字，玩擦边球，继续报导事故真相。
《经济观察报》30号同样以醒目的标题≪温州没有奇迹≫，揭开了8篇强有力的问责。其
中问：≪谁是真凶≫、≪铁道部在掩饰什么？≫。还提了一些设想，例如≪全国人大应启动
特别调查程序≫、≪请为死难者立碑≫、≪请敬畏生命≫、≪分拆铁道部≫等等…。《经济观察
网》还以〝经济观察报九评温州动车追尾事故〞专题，评论这起事件。
而《新京报》将原本的头版改为北京暴雨，但以《7日雨未绝，1天2预警》为标题，似
乎想用气象比喻心境。
有报社编辑呼吁报社老总鼓起勇气抵制禁令，〝站着把新闻做了〞。媒体人阿丁说：〝
媒体老总们，请在此刻积蓄勇气、唤醒良知……禁令是用来突破的不是用来奴才听令
的，绳索是用来挣脱的不是拿来自缚手脚的。〞
《苹果日报》报导，大陆传媒研究者统计发现，29号至少有近百家〝都市类报纸〞，引
用温家宝〝要给群众真相〞、〝是否救人第一，铁道部要回答〞等做头版大题，形成〝
千夫指向铁道部〞舆论倾向。这和2008年5.12〝四川大地震〞后的沉默相比，大陆媒体
在温州火车事故中显然〝人性〞有所擡头。然而，〝人性〞的一面最终会不会战胜〝党
性〞，令人拭目以待。
《九评共产党》书中〝以党性取代和消灭人性〞写道：〝共产党员以及共产社会的人民
首先被要求的，是绝对的服从，这是所谓组织路线的全部内容。……按照共产党的要
求，（党性）永远超越普遍人性而存在。……一个党员，无论他在私下对你表达了怎样的
意见，但一旦作为党员表态时，必然要和'组织'保持一致。〞
新唐人记者吴惟、周昕屹综合报导
Banning Train Crash Reports
After the major crash of high-speed train near Wenzhou,
many Chinese newspapers were preparing feature reportson the incident and
to mourn the crash victims.However, the Chinese Central Propaganda
Department(CCPD) issued orders to ban such reports.Some newspapers left the
pages blankto express their dissatisfaction.However, a large number of
media still disobeyed.
For example, Economic Observer News published 8 pagesof "special reports"
to analyze the crash.
Since July 30, no report on "Wenzhou high-speed rail crash"is allowed to be
published.
On July 29, CCPD issued three consecutive ordersto ban all mainland reports
on Wenzhou high-speed rail crash,demanding "no more reports and no more
commentsbesides reporting positive news and info issued by authorities."
A senior editor of a Guangzhou-based newspaper said,
"Tonight, hundreds of newspapers change pages;thousands of journalists'
articles are rejected."
It is said that 21 Century Business Herald andChina Business changed eight
relevant pages.Beijing News, Qianjiang Evening News, China Business
Dailyalso changed their original planning.
CCPD's prohibition caused strong reactionsfrom the media.Youth Daily,
Shanghai's Oriental Morning Post andSouthern Metropolitan Dailyall left
their pages blank to express their dissatisfaction.
Also, editors of many newspapers posted the original pageson
micro-blogs;journalists posted some never-to-be-published news articleson
their personal micro-blogs.
The communist authorities' high-handed suppression ofpublic opinion ignited
the Chinese media's disobedience.It is rarely seen in recent years.
On July 30, Youth Daily's headline was a smiling Yiyi,an infant girl that
was rescued from a crashed train carriage,with the words, "Yiyi, you must
grow up well."Thus, it was able to continue reporting the truth indirectly.
Also on July 30, Economic Observer News publishedeight articles of powerful
criticismwith a striking title "No miracles in Wenzhou".
The articles were "Who is the real killer?" and"What is the Ministry of
Railways trying to hide?"It also provided some suggestions, such
as"National Congress should start a special investigation,""Please
construct monuments for crash victims","Please respect people's lives",
"Split the Ministry of Railways".Economic Observer News also commented on
this incidentwith a special topic "The Nine Commentaries on Train Crash."
Beijing News changed its first page to reportthe downpour in Beijing, with
the title"Endless Raining for Seven Days;Two Warnings per day," linking its
feeling to the weather.
A newspaper editor called for the newspaper executives'courage to resist
the ban.Media professional A Ding said,
"The media gurus, please gather your courageand awake your conscience at
this moment…The ban should be broken, not to be obeyed by slaves.The rope
should be cast away, not be used to tie people."
According to Apple Daily, mainland media researcher found,on July 29,
nearly a hundred of municipal newspapersquoted Wen Jiabao, such as "give
the truth to people",forming a consensus of questioning the Ministry of
Railways.Compared with the total silence after theSichuan earthquake in
2008,mainland media exhibited their human feelingson Wenzhou rail
crash.However, whether this "human nature" can conquer theCommunist "party
nature" or not, let's wait and see.
The book "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party"on "How Party Nature
Replaces and Eliminates Human Nature":"The first and foremost requirement
of all CCP members andthose ruled by the CCP is to obey commands
unconditionally.This is what the organization line is all about……But placed
above human nature and feelings is the Party nature,which, according to the
requirements of the Communist Party,transcends humanity.A Party member must
remain consistent with the Party linewhen speaking publicly, no matter how
he feels privately. "
NTD reporters Wu Wei and Zhou Xinyi 2011-08-01
09:16:22http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/08/01/a567545.html.-【禁闻】人性与
党性-媒体与禁令.html
【新唐人2011年8月1日讯】温州〝动力火车〞撞毁事故29号〝头七〞，中国大陆全国多
家报纸不约而同，准备好许多版位报导事件，并悼念死难者，但却在中宣部的禁令下撤
版，有些报章以近乎〝开天窗〞方式，表示不满。不过，仍有大批媒体抗命。其中，《
经济观察报》以八个版面的〝特别报导〞，详细分析了〝温州动车事故〞。
从7月30号开始，〝温州动车追撞事故〞的相关报导，进入噤声期。
29号晚9点左右，中共政治局常委李长春长期控制的〝中宣部〞，连续下达3道封杀
令，对于大陆媒体报导温州动车事故，〝除正面报导和权威部门发布的动态消息外，不
再做任何报导，不发任何评论。〞
一名广州报社的资深编辑透露：当晚，百家报纸在撤版，千位记者被毙稿。
据了解，《21世纪经济报导》和财经周报《中国经营报》接到禁令后，各自撤下8个相
关版面；《新京报》、浙江的《钱江晚报》和西安《华商报》等也都撤下了原本准备好
的版面。
中宣部的禁令引起了大陆媒体的强烈反应。上海《青年报》、《东方早报》和广州《南
方都市报》等，都以〝开天窗〞的方式表达不满。此外，有多家报社的编辑在微博上贴
出了被撤下的版面，也有记者在个人微薄上转播再也无法上版的新闻。
不过，中共当局镇压舆论的铁腕作风，反而引爆中国近年罕见的"媒体抗命潮"。
上海《青年报》30号头版，是以获救的小女孩伊伊笑脸图片，配以"伊伊，一定要好好
长大"的文字，玩擦边球，继续报导事故真相。
《经济观察报》30号同样以醒目的标题≪温州没有奇迹≫，揭开了8篇强有力的问责。其
中问：≪谁是真凶≫、≪铁道部在掩饰什么？≫。还提了一些设想，例如≪全国人大应启动
特别调查程序≫、≪请为死难者立碑≫、≪请敬畏生命≫、≪分拆铁道部≫等等…。《经济观察
网》还以〝经济观察报九评温州动车追尾事故〞专题，评论这起事件。
而《新京报》将原本的头版改为北京暴雨，但以《7日雨未绝，1天2预警》为标题，似
乎想用气象比喻心境。
有报社编辑呼吁报社老总鼓起勇气抵制禁令，〝站着把新闻做了〞。媒体人阿丁说：〝
媒体老总们，请在此刻积蓄勇气、唤醒良知……禁令是用来突破的不是用来奴才听令
的，绳索是用来挣脱的不是拿来自缚手脚的。〞
《苹果日报》报导，大陆传媒研究者统计发现，29号至少有近百家〝都市类报纸〞，引
用温家宝〝要给群众真相〞、〝是否救人第一，铁道部要回答〞等做头版大题，形成〝
千夫指向铁道部〞舆论倾向。这和2008年5.12〝四川大地震〞后的沉默相比，大陆媒体
在温州火车事故中显然〝人性〞有所擡头。然而，〝人性〞的一面最终会不会战胜〝党
性〞，令人拭目以待。
《九评共产党》书中〝以党性取代和消灭人性〞写道：〝共产党员以及共产社会的人民
首先被要求的，是绝对的服从，这是所谓组织路线的全部内容。……按照共产党的要
求，（党性）永远超越普遍人性而存在。……一个党员，无论他在私下对你表达了怎样的
意见，但一旦作为党员表态时，必然要和'组织'保持一致。〞
新唐人记者吴惟、周昕屹综合报导
Banning Train Crash Reports
After the major crash of high-speed train near Wenzhou,
many Chinese newspapers were preparing feature reportson the incident and
to mourn the crash victims.However, the Chinese Central Propaganda
Department(CCPD) issued orders to ban such reports.Some newspapers left the
pages blankto express their dissatisfaction.However, a large number of
media still disobeyed.
For example, Economic Observer News published 8 pagesof "special reports"
to analyze the crash.
Since July 30, no report on "Wenzhou high-speed rail crash"is allowed to be
published.
On July 29, CCPD issued three consecutive ordersto ban all mainland reports
on Wenzhou high-speed rail crash,demanding "no more reports and no more
commentsbesides reporting positive news and info issued by authorities."
A senior editor of a Guangzhou-based newspaper said,
"Tonight, hundreds of newspapers change pages;thousands of journalists'
articles are rejected."
It is said that 21 Century Business Herald andChina Business changed eight
relevant pages.Beijing News, Qianjiang Evening News, China Business
Dailyalso changed their original planning.
CCPD's prohibition caused strong reactionsfrom the media.Youth Daily,
Shanghai's Oriental Morning Post andSouthern Metropolitan Dailyall left
their pages blank to express their dissatisfaction.
Also, editors of many newspapers posted the original pageson
micro-blogs;journalists posted some never-to-be-published news articleson
their personal micro-blogs.
The communist authorities' high-handed suppression ofpublic opinion ignited
the Chinese media's disobedience.It is rarely seen in recent years.
On July 30, Youth Daily's headline was a smiling Yiyi,an infant girl that
was rescued from a crashed train carriage,with the words, "Yiyi, you must
grow up well."Thus, it was able to continue reporting the truth indirectly.
Also on July 30, Economic Observer News publishedeight articles of powerful
criticismwith a striking title "No miracles in Wenzhou".
The articles were "Who is the real killer?" and"What is the Ministry of
Railways trying to hide?"It also provided some suggestions, such
as"National Congress should start a special investigation,""Please
construct monuments for crash victims","Please respect people's lives",
"Split the Ministry of Railways".Economic Observer News also commented on
this incidentwith a special topic "The Nine Commentaries on Train Crash."
Beijing News changed its first page to reportthe downpour in Beijing, with
the title"Endless Raining for Seven Days;Two Warnings per day," linking its
feeling to the weather.
A newspaper editor called for the newspaper executives'courage to resist
the ban.Media professional A Ding said,
"The media gurus, please gather your courageand awake your conscience at
this moment…The ban should be broken, not to be obeyed by slaves.The rope
should be cast away, not be used to tie people."
According to Apple Daily, mainland media researcher found,on July 29,
nearly a hundred of municipal newspapersquoted Wen Jiabao, such as "give
the truth to people",forming a consensus of questioning the Ministry of
Railways.Compared with the total silence after theSichuan earthquake in
2008,mainland media exhibited their human feelingson Wenzhou rail
crash.However, whether this "human nature" can conquer theCommunist "party
nature" or not, let's wait and see.
The book "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party"on "How Party Nature
Replaces and Eliminates Human Nature":"The first and foremost requirement
of all CCP members andthose ruled by the CCP is to obey commands
unconditionally.This is what the organization line is all about……But placed
above human nature and feelings is the Party nature,which, according to the
requirements of the Communist Party,transcends humanity.A Party member must
remain consistent with the Party linewhen speaking publicly, no matter how
he feels privately. "
NTD reporters Wu Wei and Zhou Xinyi 2011-08-01
09:16:22http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/08/01/a567545.html.-【禁闻】人性与
党性-媒体与禁令.html
2011年7月30日星期六
【禁闻】律师：赖昌星不判死罪违反法律
【禁闻】律师：赖昌星不判死罪违反法律
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】12年前，中国大陆最大走私案�远华案�的主角赖昌
星，在中国和加拿大双方多次角力之后，终于获得中方保证不会判他死刑的前提下，回
到了中国。赖昌星会被如何量刑？律师表示，赖昌星不判死罪，违反法律。也有学者认
为，利用好赖昌星案件也是彻底根除腐败的一个契机。
早年在对�远华走私案�的审判中，被判处死刑的有14人，无期徒刑12人，刑期不等者
多达58人。
江西律师郭莲辉认为，案子本身判了十几个死刑，首犯赖昌星不判死刑，说明中共当局
没有法律意识。行政当局怎么能指挥法律呢？
郭莲辉律师：�依照法律的规定，中国（共）政府就不应当承诺把赖昌星引渡回中国不
判他的死刑。因为赖昌星这个案子，判了那么多的死刑，牵扯那么多的高官，如果
说，中国（共）政府的这种承诺，能够兑现的话，那就说明中国不是一个法治社会。"
郭莲辉还表示，中共当局承诺不对赖昌星判死刑，但千方百计的要把他引渡回国，人们
不得不想到背后是否有权斗的问题。他说，当时调查赖昌星案子，查到一定程度查不下
去了，是由江泽民叫停的。因为如果往下查，确实会牵扯到一些还在高位的官员。
而现在，如何审理赖昌星的案子，成了中国社会广泛关注的焦点。
海外《观察网》撰稿人朱欣欣认为，赖昌星的案件肯定是�秘密审理�，但对中共做的
免死保证，朱欣欣认为不能信。
朱欣欣：�虽然中共承诺不会判他死刑。（我觉得）很难说。像网上网友传言赖昌星掌
握这么多的秘密，一旦对中共内部不利的话，恐怕不是没有灭口的可能。找个理由，有
病了，病重了，因病去世啦，就让他消失，找很多藉口很容易的。"
不过，郭莲辉律师从法律的角度上分析，赖昌星也有免除死刑的可能性。
郭莲辉：�如果说，他交代的好，能够把相关一些隐藏很深的、过去没有接触到的或者
根本没有往下查被捂住的盖子揭开来，也可以视为认罪态度较好的一种表现。如果他还
可以立功的话，对他免除死刑另当别论。�
作家铁流也表示，赖昌星一回来，使得贪官们闻风丧胆，但如果胡锦涛保住了赖昌
星，只是把他用来争夺权位，那就是中国的悲剧，存在中国的贪腐就无法制止。
铁流：�如果这是只把很重要的利剑，而仅仅用来争夺权力，那么就画上了句号，那中
国的贪腐根本就没法制止了。如果胡锦涛真是为国家民族着想，想在中国历史留下不朽
的丰功，留下万世之英明，他就应该把这个事作为贪腐界的一个决口打开，这些贪官都
会全部落马。�
不过，朱欣欣认为：中国一切都是不确定的。
朱欣欣：�没有法治的共产社会，对它的任何预测都是很难的，它是一个铁幕，都是暗
箱操作，甚至统治者自己他也无法把握自己的未来。这种体制下，谁都没有安全感，谁
也搞不清下一步怎样。�
朱欣欣希望赖昌星把自己知道的说出来，哪怕一时公布不出来，至少中共内部留下一些
真实材料，让真相有机会在将来重见天日。
新唐人记者白梅、宋风、薛莉采访报导。
Lawyers: Lai's Clemency Violates Law
After repeated negotiations between China and Canada,Lai Changxing, the
main culprit behind the Yuan Hua Case,China's biggest smuggling case of 12
years ago,was recently sent back to China.China previously promised to not
sentence Lai to death.
How will Lai be punished, then?Some lawyers said that Lai's death pardon is
against the law.Where as some scholars believe thatLai's case is a good
opportunity to eradicate corruption.
2 were sentenced to life imprisonment,and 58 people received lesser
sentences.
Guo Lianhui, lawyer from Jiangxi Province, said that
with 14 people sentenced to death in the case,the fact that the principal
culprit Lai was granted clemencyshows the utter disregard for the law bythe
Chinese Communist Party's (CCP).How can administrative officials be above
the law?
Attorney Guo Lianhui: According to the law,
the CCP should not have promised Lai's clemency,after extraditing him back
to China.Because there were so many people sentenced to deathand so many
high-level officials involved in the case,if the CCP indeed carries out
such a promise,it will indicate that China is not governed by the rule of
law.
Guo also said that in an effort to extradite Lai to China,the CCP promised
not to kill him.It makes people curious about the possible power
strugglebehind the scenes.He said that at that time, the then-CCP leader
Jiang Zeminordered the investigation into Lai's case dropped,because a lot
more high-ranking officials were involved.
But how to properly try Lai has becomea hot topic of the Chinese society.
Zhu Xinxin, an overseas writer from "China Observer,"believes that Lai's
case will surely be secretly tried.As to the CCP's promise of clemency in
Lai's case,Zhu does not trust the CCP's promise.
Zhu Xinxin: "Although the CCP promised not to sentencehim to death. (I
believe that) it's hard to say.As per an online rumor, since Lai knows so
many secrets,if he goes against the CCP, he might be killed.The CCP will
find an excuse, like a deadly illness,and makes him disappear forever.That
is pretty easy for the CCP to do."
However, Guo analyzed the case from a legal perspective
and said that there is a chance thatLai could still be granted clemency.
Guo: If he gives an honest testimony which revealsa lot of previously
hidden facts,or if he can make other contributions to the state,then he
will stand a better chance to be granted clemency.
Tie Liu, a writer, said that when Lai returned to China,every corrupt
official was so afraid.However if the CCP's current head Hu Jintao uses
Laionly as a tool for his power struggle,then that will be China's
tragedyand China's corruption will never stop.
Tie Liu: "If (Lai) is a sharp sword (used to end corruption),to use it only
for power struggle will be a pity.If that is the case, corruption in China
will never stop.
If Hu Jintao cares about the nation and wants to make majorcontributions to
China's history and be well remembered,then he should use this case to look
into the vast corruptiontaking place in China and dismiss all those corrupt
officials."
But Zhu Xinxin believes that in China,nothing is certain.
Zhu Xinxin said: "In a communist society without laws,any prediction is
uncertain, because it is an iron curtain,with everything taking place on
the backstage;even the tyrants cannot predict their own future.In such a
system, people have no sense of security andno one knows what the next step
is going to be."
Zhu Xinxin hopes that Lai can tell what he knows,or at least leave some
evidence of the CCP.If the truth cannot be exposed immediately,at least it
can someday be brought to light.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Song Feng and Xue Li 2011-07-30
11:02:01http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566858.html.-【禁闻】律
师：赖昌星不判死罪违反法律.html
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】12年前，中国大陆最大走私案�远华案�的主角赖昌
星，在中国和加拿大双方多次角力之后，终于获得中方保证不会判他死刑的前提下，回
到了中国。赖昌星会被如何量刑？律师表示，赖昌星不判死罪，违反法律。也有学者认
为，利用好赖昌星案件也是彻底根除腐败的一个契机。
早年在对�远华走私案�的审判中，被判处死刑的有14人，无期徒刑12人，刑期不等者
多达58人。
江西律师郭莲辉认为，案子本身判了十几个死刑，首犯赖昌星不判死刑，说明中共当局
没有法律意识。行政当局怎么能指挥法律呢？
郭莲辉律师：�依照法律的规定，中国（共）政府就不应当承诺把赖昌星引渡回中国不
判他的死刑。因为赖昌星这个案子，判了那么多的死刑，牵扯那么多的高官，如果
说，中国（共）政府的这种承诺，能够兑现的话，那就说明中国不是一个法治社会。"
郭莲辉还表示，中共当局承诺不对赖昌星判死刑，但千方百计的要把他引渡回国，人们
不得不想到背后是否有权斗的问题。他说，当时调查赖昌星案子，查到一定程度查不下
去了，是由江泽民叫停的。因为如果往下查，确实会牵扯到一些还在高位的官员。
而现在，如何审理赖昌星的案子，成了中国社会广泛关注的焦点。
海外《观察网》撰稿人朱欣欣认为，赖昌星的案件肯定是�秘密审理�，但对中共做的
免死保证，朱欣欣认为不能信。
朱欣欣：�虽然中共承诺不会判他死刑。（我觉得）很难说。像网上网友传言赖昌星掌
握这么多的秘密，一旦对中共内部不利的话，恐怕不是没有灭口的可能。找个理由，有
病了，病重了，因病去世啦，就让他消失，找很多藉口很容易的。"
不过，郭莲辉律师从法律的角度上分析，赖昌星也有免除死刑的可能性。
郭莲辉：�如果说，他交代的好，能够把相关一些隐藏很深的、过去没有接触到的或者
根本没有往下查被捂住的盖子揭开来，也可以视为认罪态度较好的一种表现。如果他还
可以立功的话，对他免除死刑另当别论。�
作家铁流也表示，赖昌星一回来，使得贪官们闻风丧胆，但如果胡锦涛保住了赖昌
星，只是把他用来争夺权位，那就是中国的悲剧，存在中国的贪腐就无法制止。
铁流：�如果这是只把很重要的利剑，而仅仅用来争夺权力，那么就画上了句号，那中
国的贪腐根本就没法制止了。如果胡锦涛真是为国家民族着想，想在中国历史留下不朽
的丰功，留下万世之英明，他就应该把这个事作为贪腐界的一个决口打开，这些贪官都
会全部落马。�
不过，朱欣欣认为：中国一切都是不确定的。
朱欣欣：�没有法治的共产社会，对它的任何预测都是很难的，它是一个铁幕，都是暗
箱操作，甚至统治者自己他也无法把握自己的未来。这种体制下，谁都没有安全感，谁
也搞不清下一步怎样。�
朱欣欣希望赖昌星把自己知道的说出来，哪怕一时公布不出来，至少中共内部留下一些
真实材料，让真相有机会在将来重见天日。
新唐人记者白梅、宋风、薛莉采访报导。
Lawyers: Lai's Clemency Violates Law
After repeated negotiations between China and Canada,Lai Changxing, the
main culprit behind the Yuan Hua Case,China's biggest smuggling case of 12
years ago,was recently sent back to China.China previously promised to not
sentence Lai to death.
How will Lai be punished, then?Some lawyers said that Lai's death pardon is
against the law.Where as some scholars believe thatLai's case is a good
opportunity to eradicate corruption.
2 were sentenced to life imprisonment,and 58 people received lesser
sentences.
Guo Lianhui, lawyer from Jiangxi Province, said that
with 14 people sentenced to death in the case,the fact that the principal
culprit Lai was granted clemencyshows the utter disregard for the law bythe
Chinese Communist Party's (CCP).How can administrative officials be above
the law?
Attorney Guo Lianhui: According to the law,
the CCP should not have promised Lai's clemency,after extraditing him back
to China.Because there were so many people sentenced to deathand so many
high-level officials involved in the case,if the CCP indeed carries out
such a promise,it will indicate that China is not governed by the rule of
law.
Guo also said that in an effort to extradite Lai to China,the CCP promised
not to kill him.It makes people curious about the possible power
strugglebehind the scenes.He said that at that time, the then-CCP leader
Jiang Zeminordered the investigation into Lai's case dropped,because a lot
more high-ranking officials were involved.
But how to properly try Lai has becomea hot topic of the Chinese society.
Zhu Xinxin, an overseas writer from "China Observer,"believes that Lai's
case will surely be secretly tried.As to the CCP's promise of clemency in
Lai's case,Zhu does not trust the CCP's promise.
Zhu Xinxin: "Although the CCP promised not to sentencehim to death. (I
believe that) it's hard to say.As per an online rumor, since Lai knows so
many secrets,if he goes against the CCP, he might be killed.The CCP will
find an excuse, like a deadly illness,and makes him disappear forever.That
is pretty easy for the CCP to do."
However, Guo analyzed the case from a legal perspective
and said that there is a chance thatLai could still be granted clemency.
Guo: If he gives an honest testimony which revealsa lot of previously
hidden facts,or if he can make other contributions to the state,then he
will stand a better chance to be granted clemency.
Tie Liu, a writer, said that when Lai returned to China,every corrupt
official was so afraid.However if the CCP's current head Hu Jintao uses
Laionly as a tool for his power struggle,then that will be China's
tragedyand China's corruption will never stop.
Tie Liu: "If (Lai) is a sharp sword (used to end corruption),to use it only
for power struggle will be a pity.If that is the case, corruption in China
will never stop.
If Hu Jintao cares about the nation and wants to make majorcontributions to
China's history and be well remembered,then he should use this case to look
into the vast corruptiontaking place in China and dismiss all those corrupt
officials."
But Zhu Xinxin believes that in China,nothing is certain.
Zhu Xinxin said: "In a communist society without laws,any prediction is
uncertain, because it is an iron curtain,with everything taking place on
the backstage;even the tyrants cannot predict their own future.In such a
system, people have no sense of security andno one knows what the next step
is going to be."
Zhu Xinxin hopes that Lai can tell what he knows,or at least leave some
evidence of the CCP.If the truth cannot be exposed immediately,at least it
can someday be brought to light.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Song Feng and Xue Li 2011-07-30
11:02:01http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566858.html.-【禁闻】律
师：赖昌星不判死罪违反法律.html
【禁闻】否天灾 温州动车惨案疑点犹未解
【禁闻】否天灾 温州动车惨案疑点犹未解
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】28号，中共当局首次公布，温州动车追尾事故是�信号设
备设计�有严重缺陷问题造成的。肯定了�温州动车事故�是�人为�造成，而不是�
天灾�引发。但外界认为，时隔5天当局才公布原因，令人费解，其中还有更多的疑点
等待厘清。请听专家们的看法。
国务院�动车追尾事故�调查组全体会议7月28号召开。上海铁路局长表示，经初步调
查显示，由于温州南站信号灯设备存在缺陷，应该显示红灯的时候显示绿灯，没有给后
车提供应有的信号，相关调度人员也没有发出预警，而引发追尾事故。
原�轨道客车股份有限公司�从事工程质量管理的工程师魏景翌认为，这是一个严重的
基本错误。从这一点上就反应出，整个系统还没有达到高速铁路运营的要求。
魏景翌（工程师）：�当时信号确实失灵啦，那就是说，已经可以证实，本来是应该亮
红灯但它仍然是显示绿灯。那也就是说，信号系统确实失灵。那不管是设计问题还是制
造质量问题，那就是说这套信号系统没有经过考验，直接上线运行了。然后出现故障。
这个是不允许出现的。�
魏景翌表示，信号系统、通讯系统，对高速铁路来说是非常重要的系统。但还不足以构
成动车追尾事故的主要原因。
工程师魏景翌：�作为高速铁路来讲，显示灯这一套系统，用灯啊，红绿灯这种显示方
式，其实不适用于高速铁路。高速铁路它只能说这个是作为一种附加信号系统来用的。
因为高速跑到200公里以上的时候，司机肉眼已经难以辨别信号灯。所以实际上它的控
制并不是主要的。我认为不是主要靠信号灯来控制的。主要还是靠自动控制。�
温州南站信号设备设计单位的母公司――�中国铁路通信信号集团公司�28号已经公开承
认，温州南站信号设备确实有设计问题，公司会承担与自己相关的那部分责任。�
不过，魏景翌工程师认为，这个信号设计生产部门高调的公开承认错误，有�避重就轻
�之嫌。他们试图用设备故障来掩盖中国高铁�管理上�的重大漏洞。
魏景翌（工程师）：�说明这个自动停车系统、自动灯号系统并没有起作用。相比这两
个而言，调度更重要。因为调度应该跟前后动车时时联络的。那么这种应该比信号机还
要快。但是呢，即使是信号灯失灵了，（调度）仍然可以达到避免事故的作用。所
以，现在只能说只发觉出了一个并不是太重要的原因。�
《法国国际广播电台》评论说，当局的初步结论给予了后车追尾事故解释，但没有解释
前车故障原因。同时，人们关心，信号与调度是否同一来源，或者根本就是两个可能发
生问题的不同系统。
而面对所有质疑，文章说，中共当局尤其是铁道部都极力保护高铁项目，信誓旦旦说高
铁本身技术安全与运输管理没问题。如今官方的结论能否经受科学技术验证考评，以及
被舆论接受，现在下结论还为时过早。
新唐人记者李岚、唐睿、孙宁采访报导。
Crash: A Natural Disaster?
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) announced on July 28
that the cause of the high-speed rail crash wasserious flaws in the design
of the signaling equipment.It was the first time the CCP admitted that the
train crashwas caused by human error, rather than a natural disaster.It's
puzzling to many thatthe CCP announced the cause five days after the
crash.There are also other doubtful points to be investigated.
The crash investigation team of the CCP's State Councilhad a plenary
meeting on July 28.On the meeting,the Shanghai Railway Bureau chief stated
thatthe crash was a result of signaling equipment defectsat Wenzhou South
Station.Due to these defects,a red light was wrongly displayed as
green.Also, the operator didn't give warningsbefore the crash.
Wei Jingyi, former project quality control engineer ofRailway Vehicles Co.
Ltd., regards this as a fundamental error.He says that it alone shows that
the high-speed rail systemis far from meeting the operational requirements.
Wei Jingyi: If the signal equipment indeed malfunctioned,displaying a green
light instead of a red one,regardless whether the problem is of design or
quality,the system was not tested before it was put to use.This is by no
means acceptable.
Wei said that the signal and communication systemsplay important roles in
the high-speed rail system.However, they are not important enoughto be the
main cause of the crash.
Wei Jingyi: Signal light systems are in fact not quite suitablefor the
high-speed railways.The signal systems are extra and non-essential,
because when a train travels at a speed higher than 200 km/h,the driver can
hardly identify the lights.The train is operated automatically,not relying
on signals.
The parent of the signal equipment design company forWenzhou South
Station,China Railway Signal & Communications Corporation,acknowledged
openly on July 28 thatthe design of the signal equipmentat Wenzhou South
Station did have flaws,and the company would assume due responsibility.
However, Wei believes that this public apology wasan attempt of the design
company to create a diversion.The firm tries to use the excuse of
"equipment malfunction"to cover up the railways' major administration
loopholes.
Wei: It indicates that the automatic brakingand the signaling systems
didn't work.However, dispatching is more important than both,because
dispatchers communicate with the trains.Therefore, it works faster than
signals.
Even if signals don't work,proper dispatching can still avoid a crash.
Radio France Internationale commented that
the authorities' preliminary conclusion had explainedthe cause of the
rear-end crash by the second train.However, it didn't explain the
malfunction of the first train.
People are also concerned about whether the signals anddispatching system
were independent of each other.
The article said that the CCP authorities,especially the Ministry of
Railways,defend the high-speed rail projects with full force.
They promised that there are no technical or security problemsin the
operation and transportation management.It is only too early to jump into
conclusionabout the CCP's claims, without the test of time.
NTD reporters Li Lan, Tang Rui and Sun Ning 2011-07-30
11:01:39http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566859.html.-【禁闻】否天灾
-温州动车惨案疑点犹未解.html
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】28号，中共当局首次公布，温州动车追尾事故是�信号设
备设计�有严重缺陷问题造成的。肯定了�温州动车事故�是�人为�造成，而不是�
天灾�引发。但外界认为，时隔5天当局才公布原因，令人费解，其中还有更多的疑点
等待厘清。请听专家们的看法。
国务院�动车追尾事故�调查组全体会议7月28号召开。上海铁路局长表示，经初步调
查显示，由于温州南站信号灯设备存在缺陷，应该显示红灯的时候显示绿灯，没有给后
车提供应有的信号，相关调度人员也没有发出预警，而引发追尾事故。
原�轨道客车股份有限公司�从事工程质量管理的工程师魏景翌认为，这是一个严重的
基本错误。从这一点上就反应出，整个系统还没有达到高速铁路运营的要求。
魏景翌（工程师）：�当时信号确实失灵啦，那就是说，已经可以证实，本来是应该亮
红灯但它仍然是显示绿灯。那也就是说，信号系统确实失灵。那不管是设计问题还是制
造质量问题，那就是说这套信号系统没有经过考验，直接上线运行了。然后出现故障。
这个是不允许出现的。�
魏景翌表示，信号系统、通讯系统，对高速铁路来说是非常重要的系统。但还不足以构
成动车追尾事故的主要原因。
工程师魏景翌：�作为高速铁路来讲，显示灯这一套系统，用灯啊，红绿灯这种显示方
式，其实不适用于高速铁路。高速铁路它只能说这个是作为一种附加信号系统来用的。
因为高速跑到200公里以上的时候，司机肉眼已经难以辨别信号灯。所以实际上它的控
制并不是主要的。我认为不是主要靠信号灯来控制的。主要还是靠自动控制。�
温州南站信号设备设计单位的母公司――�中国铁路通信信号集团公司�28号已经公开承
认，温州南站信号设备确实有设计问题，公司会承担与自己相关的那部分责任。�
不过，魏景翌工程师认为，这个信号设计生产部门高调的公开承认错误，有�避重就轻
�之嫌。他们试图用设备故障来掩盖中国高铁�管理上�的重大漏洞。
魏景翌（工程师）：�说明这个自动停车系统、自动灯号系统并没有起作用。相比这两
个而言，调度更重要。因为调度应该跟前后动车时时联络的。那么这种应该比信号机还
要快。但是呢，即使是信号灯失灵了，（调度）仍然可以达到避免事故的作用。所
以，现在只能说只发觉出了一个并不是太重要的原因。�
《法国国际广播电台》评论说，当局的初步结论给予了后车追尾事故解释，但没有解释
前车故障原因。同时，人们关心，信号与调度是否同一来源，或者根本就是两个可能发
生问题的不同系统。
而面对所有质疑，文章说，中共当局尤其是铁道部都极力保护高铁项目，信誓旦旦说高
铁本身技术安全与运输管理没问题。如今官方的结论能否经受科学技术验证考评，以及
被舆论接受，现在下结论还为时过早。
新唐人记者李岚、唐睿、孙宁采访报导。
Crash: A Natural Disaster?
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) announced on July 28
that the cause of the high-speed rail crash wasserious flaws in the design
of the signaling equipment.It was the first time the CCP admitted that the
train crashwas caused by human error, rather than a natural disaster.It's
puzzling to many thatthe CCP announced the cause five days after the
crash.There are also other doubtful points to be investigated.
The crash investigation team of the CCP's State Councilhad a plenary
meeting on July 28.On the meeting,the Shanghai Railway Bureau chief stated
thatthe crash was a result of signaling equipment defectsat Wenzhou South
Station.Due to these defects,a red light was wrongly displayed as
green.Also, the operator didn't give warningsbefore the crash.
Wei Jingyi, former project quality control engineer ofRailway Vehicles Co.
Ltd., regards this as a fundamental error.He says that it alone shows that
the high-speed rail systemis far from meeting the operational requirements.
Wei Jingyi: If the signal equipment indeed malfunctioned,displaying a green
light instead of a red one,regardless whether the problem is of design or
quality,the system was not tested before it was put to use.This is by no
means acceptable.
Wei said that the signal and communication systemsplay important roles in
the high-speed rail system.However, they are not important enoughto be the
main cause of the crash.
Wei Jingyi: Signal light systems are in fact not quite suitablefor the
high-speed railways.The signal systems are extra and non-essential,
because when a train travels at a speed higher than 200 km/h,the driver can
hardly identify the lights.The train is operated automatically,not relying
on signals.
The parent of the signal equipment design company forWenzhou South
Station,China Railway Signal & Communications Corporation,acknowledged
openly on July 28 thatthe design of the signal equipmentat Wenzhou South
Station did have flaws,and the company would assume due responsibility.
However, Wei believes that this public apology wasan attempt of the design
company to create a diversion.The firm tries to use the excuse of
"equipment malfunction"to cover up the railways' major administration
loopholes.
Wei: It indicates that the automatic brakingand the signaling systems
didn't work.However, dispatching is more important than both,because
dispatchers communicate with the trains.Therefore, it works faster than
signals.
Even if signals don't work,proper dispatching can still avoid a crash.
Radio France Internationale commented that
the authorities' preliminary conclusion had explainedthe cause of the
rear-end crash by the second train.However, it didn't explain the
malfunction of the first train.
People are also concerned about whether the signals anddispatching system
were independent of each other.
The article said that the CCP authorities,especially the Ministry of
Railways,defend the high-speed rail projects with full force.
They promised that there are no technical or security problemsin the
operation and transportation management.It is only too early to jump into
conclusionabout the CCP's claims, without the test of time.
NTD reporters Li Lan, Tang Rui and Sun Ning 2011-07-30
11:01:39http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566859.html.-【禁闻】否天灾
-温州动车惨案疑点犹未解.html
2011年7月29日星期五
【禁闻】信号系统出错 无其他安全预案？
【禁闻】信号系统出错 无其他安全预案？
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】上海铁路局长声称，�温州动车事故�是由于信号灯设备
存在缺陷，雷击后红灯错误显示为绿灯而导致后方追尾。专家解释，这种红绿灯信号和
紧急制动系统是相连的，在绿灯的情况下，紧急制动不会启动。但民众质疑，高速动车
难道没有其他安全措施预案？
《新华网》报导，上海铁路局局长安路生28号说，"7．23"动车事故是由于温州南站信
号设备在设计上存在严重缺陷，遭雷击发生故障后，导致本应显示为红灯的区间信号机
错误显示为绿灯。
北京交通大学经济管理学院副教授李红昌表示，这个原因和他预先分析的比较接近。他
解释，这个红绿灯信号指的不是路上可见的红绿灯，而是前方列车在碾压轨道之后向后
方列车自动发出的车辆运行信号，这项信号系统和列车上的紧急制动系统相连。
李红昌：�但是是以它接收到的信号为红灯为前提，它才可能停车，因为你必须触发
它。车上虽然有自动保护系统，但是你地面相关通信设备传来的信号，必须是表明前方
有危险才行。但是恰恰传来的信号是绿灯。因此车本身不会自动停车的。�
但是民众质疑说，难道除了这个红绿灯系统，高速运行的动车再也没有其他安全保障系
统了吗？铁路的野外设施没有避雷设施吗？
彭定鼎（北京自由撰稿人）：�我不相信是设计缺陷。因为这是试验过的，肯定是试验
过的。而且即便是设计缺陷，他出现了故障之后，没有应变措施吗？我不相信高铁的运
营管理系统中没有考虑到出现意外事故的预案，是这个预案没有有效启动。这是根本的
原因。�
而专栏作家杨恒均指出，廉价的电子设备都可以探查到前方的障碍物，为何高速的动车
仅仅依靠红绿灯信号系统？
杨恒均：�我们随便买一个GPS，我们都可以侦查到很多东西，包括前面有没有红绿灯
啊，我的速度有多少啊？前面有没有电子眼啊？随便买一个几千块钱的东西都可以搞定
了。你铁道动车安装的红绿灯这么经不起问题？�
安路生当天在温州召开的国务院"7．23"甬温线特别重大铁路交通事故全体会议上
说，存在设计缺陷的信号设备由北京一家研究设计院设计，2009年9月28号投入使用。
杨恒均质疑说，全国的高铁和动车是否都在使用出故障的红绿灯系统？缺陷有没有得到
纠正？为何现在动车和高铁依然在运行？为何出事线路在事故原因还没友查清的情况下
迅速恢复通车？
杨恒均：�我觉得应该一查到底。包括这个信号是谁提供的？技术经过过关没有？还有
投标是怎么来的？我听说很多网友质疑铁道部修这种高铁动车，完全把工程承包给自己
人。�
安路生在会议上还说，在雷击造成温州南站信号设备故障后，电务值班人员没有意识到
信号可能错误显示，安全意识敏感性不强；温州南站值班人员对新设备关键部位性能不
了解，没能及时有效发现和处置设备问题。
新唐人记者秦雪 萧宇 采访报导。
No Plan for Signal System Error?
Shanghai's Railway Bureau director claimed that WenzhouHigh-Speed Rail
Accident was due to defective signal lights.equipment damaged by lightening
turned red light to green,which caused the rear-end collision of two
trains.Experts explained that the traffic light signalsare connected to the
emergency brake system,which will not be activated under a green light.
People questioned the emergency plansfor the high speed railway.
Xinhua reported that An Lusheng,head of Shanghai Railway Bureau, said on
July 28,the 7 ． 23 high-speed train accident was due to serious
designflaws of the signal equipment at Wenzhou South Station.After
lightening strikes, the signal machine wrongly displayedgreen lights
instead of red lights.
Associate Prof. Li Hongchang of Beijing's Jiaotong University,said the
cause announced is close to his previous analysis.He explained thatthe
signal lights are not road traffic lights.They are signals sent
automatically by trainsto the ones running behind them.This signal system
is connected tothe emergency braking system.
Li Hongchang: "The precondition is that the signal receivedmust be red, and
then the emergency brake is triggered.Although there are automatic
protection systems on board,they are activated only by signals showing
dangers ahead.But if the signal sent is green,the train will not
automatically stop. "
People questioned, are there not any additionalprotection systems other
than the signal lights?Are there not any lightening protection facilitiesto
protect the railway devices in the field?
Peng Dingding (Beijing-based freelance writer):
"I do not believe the cause to be design flaws.It must have been tested
before.Even if it were design flaws,isn't there any contingency plan for a
breakdown?I do not believe thatthere is no plan for unexpected
accidents.However, this plan was not effectively implemented.This is the
fundamental reason. "
Columnist Yang Hengjun pointed out thateven cheap electronic devices can
detect obstacles ahead.Why does the high-speed railway onlyrely on a
traffic light signal system?
Yang Hengjun: "Even a GPS can detect many things,including traffic lights,
the vehicle's speed and electronic eyes.I can detect all these witha device
of several thousand yuan.Why is the signal system of the high-speed railso
vulnerable? "
An Lusheng said at a meeting of the State Departmentregarding the 7 ． 23
Wenzhou Train Accidentthat the flawed signal equipment was designedby a
design institute in Beijing.It was put into use on September 28, 2009.
Yang questioned if all the high -speed railway systemsare still using the
flawed signal system?Have the flaws been corrected?Why are the high-speed
trains still running (without testing)?Why was the traffic on the route
where the crash occurredresumed so quickly before a thorough investigation?
Yang Hengjun: I think it should be investigated thoroughly,including who
provided the signals.Was the technology tested and approved?How did the
bidding process go?I have heard many netizens questioning that
the people in the Ministry of Railways alwayscontracted out railway
constructions to their relatives.
An Lusheng also said, after the lightening causedthe failure of Wenzhou
South Station's signal equipment,electrical services crew didn't realize
thatthe signal sent out could be wrong.Thus, they were not sensitive about
the security.The railway staff on duty was also not familiar withthe new
equipment's operations.They failed to identify and solve the problems.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu 2011-07-30
08:40:05http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566818.html.-【禁闻】信号系
统出错-无其他安全预案？.html
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】上海铁路局长声称，�温州动车事故�是由于信号灯设备
存在缺陷，雷击后红灯错误显示为绿灯而导致后方追尾。专家解释，这种红绿灯信号和
紧急制动系统是相连的，在绿灯的情况下，紧急制动不会启动。但民众质疑，高速动车
难道没有其他安全措施预案？
《新华网》报导，上海铁路局局长安路生28号说，"7．23"动车事故是由于温州南站信
号设备在设计上存在严重缺陷，遭雷击发生故障后，导致本应显示为红灯的区间信号机
错误显示为绿灯。
北京交通大学经济管理学院副教授李红昌表示，这个原因和他预先分析的比较接近。他
解释，这个红绿灯信号指的不是路上可见的红绿灯，而是前方列车在碾压轨道之后向后
方列车自动发出的车辆运行信号，这项信号系统和列车上的紧急制动系统相连。
李红昌：�但是是以它接收到的信号为红灯为前提，它才可能停车，因为你必须触发
它。车上虽然有自动保护系统，但是你地面相关通信设备传来的信号，必须是表明前方
有危险才行。但是恰恰传来的信号是绿灯。因此车本身不会自动停车的。�
但是民众质疑说，难道除了这个红绿灯系统，高速运行的动车再也没有其他安全保障系
统了吗？铁路的野外设施没有避雷设施吗？
彭定鼎（北京自由撰稿人）：�我不相信是设计缺陷。因为这是试验过的，肯定是试验
过的。而且即便是设计缺陷，他出现了故障之后，没有应变措施吗？我不相信高铁的运
营管理系统中没有考虑到出现意外事故的预案，是这个预案没有有效启动。这是根本的
原因。�
而专栏作家杨恒均指出，廉价的电子设备都可以探查到前方的障碍物，为何高速的动车
仅仅依靠红绿灯信号系统？
杨恒均：�我们随便买一个GPS，我们都可以侦查到很多东西，包括前面有没有红绿灯
啊，我的速度有多少啊？前面有没有电子眼啊？随便买一个几千块钱的东西都可以搞定
了。你铁道动车安装的红绿灯这么经不起问题？�
安路生当天在温州召开的国务院"7．23"甬温线特别重大铁路交通事故全体会议上
说，存在设计缺陷的信号设备由北京一家研究设计院设计，2009年9月28号投入使用。
杨恒均质疑说，全国的高铁和动车是否都在使用出故障的红绿灯系统？缺陷有没有得到
纠正？为何现在动车和高铁依然在运行？为何出事线路在事故原因还没友查清的情况下
迅速恢复通车？
杨恒均：�我觉得应该一查到底。包括这个信号是谁提供的？技术经过过关没有？还有
投标是怎么来的？我听说很多网友质疑铁道部修这种高铁动车，完全把工程承包给自己
人。�
安路生在会议上还说，在雷击造成温州南站信号设备故障后，电务值班人员没有意识到
信号可能错误显示，安全意识敏感性不强；温州南站值班人员对新设备关键部位性能不
了解，没能及时有效发现和处置设备问题。
新唐人记者秦雪 萧宇 采访报导。
No Plan for Signal System Error?
Shanghai's Railway Bureau director claimed that WenzhouHigh-Speed Rail
Accident was due to defective signal lights.equipment damaged by lightening
turned red light to green,which caused the rear-end collision of two
trains.Experts explained that the traffic light signalsare connected to the
emergency brake system,which will not be activated under a green light.
People questioned the emergency plansfor the high speed railway.
Xinhua reported that An Lusheng,head of Shanghai Railway Bureau, said on
July 28,the 7 ． 23 high-speed train accident was due to serious
designflaws of the signal equipment at Wenzhou South Station.After
lightening strikes, the signal machine wrongly displayedgreen lights
instead of red lights.
Associate Prof. Li Hongchang of Beijing's Jiaotong University,said the
cause announced is close to his previous analysis.He explained thatthe
signal lights are not road traffic lights.They are signals sent
automatically by trainsto the ones running behind them.This signal system
is connected tothe emergency braking system.
Li Hongchang: "The precondition is that the signal receivedmust be red, and
then the emergency brake is triggered.Although there are automatic
protection systems on board,they are activated only by signals showing
dangers ahead.But if the signal sent is green,the train will not
automatically stop. "
People questioned, are there not any additionalprotection systems other
than the signal lights?Are there not any lightening protection facilitiesto
protect the railway devices in the field?
Peng Dingding (Beijing-based freelance writer):
"I do not believe the cause to be design flaws.It must have been tested
before.Even if it were design flaws,isn't there any contingency plan for a
breakdown?I do not believe thatthere is no plan for unexpected
accidents.However, this plan was not effectively implemented.This is the
fundamental reason. "
Columnist Yang Hengjun pointed out thateven cheap electronic devices can
detect obstacles ahead.Why does the high-speed railway onlyrely on a
traffic light signal system?
Yang Hengjun: "Even a GPS can detect many things,including traffic lights,
the vehicle's speed and electronic eyes.I can detect all these witha device
of several thousand yuan.Why is the signal system of the high-speed railso
vulnerable? "
An Lusheng said at a meeting of the State Departmentregarding the 7 ． 23
Wenzhou Train Accidentthat the flawed signal equipment was designedby a
design institute in Beijing.It was put into use on September 28, 2009.
Yang questioned if all the high -speed railway systemsare still using the
flawed signal system?Have the flaws been corrected?Why are the high-speed
trains still running (without testing)?Why was the traffic on the route
where the crash occurredresumed so quickly before a thorough investigation?
Yang Hengjun: I think it should be investigated thoroughly,including who
provided the signals.Was the technology tested and approved?How did the
bidding process go?I have heard many netizens questioning that
the people in the Ministry of Railways alwayscontracted out railway
constructions to their relatives.
An Lusheng also said, after the lightening causedthe failure of Wenzhou
South Station's signal equipment,electrical services crew didn't realize
thatthe signal sent out could be wrong.Thus, they were not sensitive about
the security.The railway staff on duty was also not familiar withthe new
equipment's operations.They failed to identify and solve the problems.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu 2011-07-30
08:40:05http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566818.html.-【禁闻】信号系
统出错-无其他安全预案？.html
【禁闻】动车事故 信号领域垄断暴利露倪端
【禁闻】动车事故 信号领域垄断暴利露倪端
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】7月23号发生的�温州动车事故�，到28号，中共当局才第
一次对外界承认事故原因，是�信号系统设计问题�导致追尾。而在背后，为温州南站
提供了铁路信号微机监测系统的上市公司�辉煌科技�，也随之浮出水面，从而折射出
中国整个铁路信号系统领域存在的垄断与暴利。
�温州动车追尾�特大事故，酿成超过二百多人死伤的惨剧，外界一直在关注事故的原
因。28号，中共国务院调查组作出事故原因的初步报告，承认温州南站信号设备设计有
严重缺陷，没有给后车提供应有的信号。
当局公布的事故原因，让提供温州火车南站铁路信号系统的�辉煌科技公司�，陷入了
质疑。
�辉煌科技�董事会秘书李新建在接受大陆媒体《第一财经日报》采访时，拒绝承认�
辉煌科技�与这次�动车追尾事故�有直接关系。因为事故列车D3115与D301上所用的
信号系统设备，并不是他们提供的。
但是，�辉煌科技�在整个铁路信号微机检测系统行业，拥有40%以上的市场占有
率，让它还是成为了媒体质疑的聚焦点。
原德国ABB公司自动化部副总裁、自动化工程师吴文昕：�这么多互相竞争的公司情况
下，某一个公司能够达到40%，按照我看到的'辉煌科技公司'是40%，单单在这种产品的
40%的占有率，那是异常的高、非常的高。�
根据�辉煌科技�2010年年报，平安证券分析师马先文甚至预计，公司这个系统有望在
今年（2011年）将份额提升至60%左右。
吴文昕：�为什么辉煌公司可以达到这个占有率呢？是不是它在竞争的时候，通过一些
不法的手段，来拿到订单呢？当然现在我没有可能去中国大陆进行仔细的调查，我只可
以说，理论上我们要想到，比如那些反垄断部门的官员们，她应该要注意了，是不是这
个公司通过行贿的办法，通过腐败的办法，来拿到这些订单呢？�
此外，《第一财经日报》引述业内人士的话透露，目前除�辉煌科技�外，其他厂家主
要有�铁道科学研究院�通信信号研究所、�卡斯柯信号有限公司�以及�北京世纪瑞
尔技术股份有限公司�等，上述四家公司占据了整个行业近50%的市场份额。
英国《金融时报》专栏作家叶檀也注意到了上述的四家公司。她在文章《动车事故折射
体制弊端》中透露，依靠垄断铁路行车安全监控系统进入资本市场的A股上市公司�世
纪瑞尔�，它的高层有不小的来头，与铁路部门和央企等存在千丝万缕的关系。
而在近期披露的铁道部2010年年报显示，截至去年底，铁道部总负债合计1.89万亿
元，同比增长45.14%；资产负债率57.44%，去年末累计亏损772亿元。在今年一季
度，铁道部就已经亏损了37.6亿元。
另外，今年6月被�双规�的铁道部运输局副局长苏顺虎，他已经是近一年来铁道部落
马的第八位高官。
新唐人记者常春、李静、李若琳采访报导。
Monopoly in Railway Signal Industry
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime announcedon July 28 for the first
time thatthe reason for the high-speed train rear-end crash on July 23was
related to the design problems of the rail signal system.The company,
Splendor Science & Technology Co. Ltd.,
which provided the railway signal microcomputer systemto the Wenzhou South
Station, is under spotlight.This has drawn the public attention to the
issues ofmarket monopoly and humongous profitsin China's railway signal
industry.
The major accident of Wenzhou high-speed trainhas caused over 200
casualties.The public has been concerned withthe cause of the accident.On
July 28, the State Council investigation squadmade a preliminary report on
the cause,admitting that the design of the signal systemof Wenzhou South
Station had serious loopholes.It did not provide sufficient signalsto the
train that rear-ended in the way it was supposed to.
The accident cause announced by the authoritieshas put the signal system's
supplier,Splendor Science & Technology Co., Ltd.,under spotlight and
questioning.
Secretary of the Board of Directors of this company
Li Xinjian denied any direct links between the companyand the accident in
an interview with "First Financial Daily."He said the signal equipment in
the crashed trains,D3115 and D301, was not supplied by the company.
Nevertheless, this company has a 40% market sharein China's railway signal
industry,making it a focus of media focus and questioning.
Wu Wenxin, an automation engineer andformer VP of ABB in Germany:"With such
an intense competition,a company like Splendor can attain a 40% market
share.To me, it is unusually high, very high."
According to Splendor's 2010 financial report,Ping An Securities analyst Ma
Xianwen estimated thatit is hopeful for Splendor's market shareto increase
to 60% in 2011.
Wu Wenxin: How could Splendor attain such a market share?Did it obtain
orders by any illegal means?Of course, it is not possible for me to go to
Chinato conduct an investigation.Chinese anti-corruption officials should
pay attentionto any possible illegal conducts of this company,e.g.,
bribery, in order to obtain orders."
First Financial Daily also quoted informants saying that,
besides Splendor Science and Technology,other railway signal suppliers
includeSignal and Communication Research Institute,CASCO and Century Real
in Beijing.These four firms occupy nearly 50% ofthe market share in China.
Ye Tan, a columnist of British "Financial Times",has also noticed these
four companies.In an article, she revealed that Century Real,
an A-stock listed firm that monopolizesChina's rail security monitoring
system,is well connected to high-level officials in the railway systemand
enterprises owned by the CCP's central government.
The 2010 annual report of the Ministry of Railwaysindicated that, as of the
end of 2010,the total debt of the ministry amounted to RMB 1.89
trillion,which was a 45.14% increase from 2009.Its debt ratio was 57.44%.In
2010 alone, it lost RMB 77.2 billion.In 2011 Q1,it already went into a
deficit of RMB 3.76 billion.
In June 2011, associate director of transportation of theRailways Ministry,
Su Shunhu, was arrested for corruption.He is the 8th arrested high-ranking
official in this Ministryin the past year.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Jing and Li Ruolin 2011-07-30
09:25:15http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566847.html.-【禁闻】动车事
故-信号领域垄断暴利露倪端.html
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】7月23号发生的�温州动车事故�，到28号，中共当局才第
一次对外界承认事故原因，是�信号系统设计问题�导致追尾。而在背后，为温州南站
提供了铁路信号微机监测系统的上市公司�辉煌科技�，也随之浮出水面，从而折射出
中国整个铁路信号系统领域存在的垄断与暴利。
�温州动车追尾�特大事故，酿成超过二百多人死伤的惨剧，外界一直在关注事故的原
因。28号，中共国务院调查组作出事故原因的初步报告，承认温州南站信号设备设计有
严重缺陷，没有给后车提供应有的信号。
当局公布的事故原因，让提供温州火车南站铁路信号系统的�辉煌科技公司�，陷入了
质疑。
�辉煌科技�董事会秘书李新建在接受大陆媒体《第一财经日报》采访时，拒绝承认�
辉煌科技�与这次�动车追尾事故�有直接关系。因为事故列车D3115与D301上所用的
信号系统设备，并不是他们提供的。
但是，�辉煌科技�在整个铁路信号微机检测系统行业，拥有40%以上的市场占有
率，让它还是成为了媒体质疑的聚焦点。
原德国ABB公司自动化部副总裁、自动化工程师吴文昕：�这么多互相竞争的公司情况
下，某一个公司能够达到40%，按照我看到的'辉煌科技公司'是40%，单单在这种产品的
40%的占有率，那是异常的高、非常的高。�
根据�辉煌科技�2010年年报，平安证券分析师马先文甚至预计，公司这个系统有望在
今年（2011年）将份额提升至60%左右。
吴文昕：�为什么辉煌公司可以达到这个占有率呢？是不是它在竞争的时候，通过一些
不法的手段，来拿到订单呢？当然现在我没有可能去中国大陆进行仔细的调查，我只可
以说，理论上我们要想到，比如那些反垄断部门的官员们，她应该要注意了，是不是这
个公司通过行贿的办法，通过腐败的办法，来拿到这些订单呢？�
此外，《第一财经日报》引述业内人士的话透露，目前除�辉煌科技�外，其他厂家主
要有�铁道科学研究院�通信信号研究所、�卡斯柯信号有限公司�以及�北京世纪瑞
尔技术股份有限公司�等，上述四家公司占据了整个行业近50%的市场份额。
英国《金融时报》专栏作家叶檀也注意到了上述的四家公司。她在文章《动车事故折射
体制弊端》中透露，依靠垄断铁路行车安全监控系统进入资本市场的A股上市公司�世
纪瑞尔�，它的高层有不小的来头，与铁路部门和央企等存在千丝万缕的关系。
而在近期披露的铁道部2010年年报显示，截至去年底，铁道部总负债合计1.89万亿
元，同比增长45.14%；资产负债率57.44%，去年末累计亏损772亿元。在今年一季
度，铁道部就已经亏损了37.6亿元。
另外，今年6月被�双规�的铁道部运输局副局长苏顺虎，他已经是近一年来铁道部落
马的第八位高官。
新唐人记者常春、李静、李若琳采访报导。
Monopoly in Railway Signal Industry
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime announcedon July 28 for the first
time thatthe reason for the high-speed train rear-end crash on July 23was
related to the design problems of the rail signal system.The company,
Splendor Science & Technology Co. Ltd.,
which provided the railway signal microcomputer systemto the Wenzhou South
Station, is under spotlight.This has drawn the public attention to the
issues ofmarket monopoly and humongous profitsin China's railway signal
industry.
The major accident of Wenzhou high-speed trainhas caused over 200
casualties.The public has been concerned withthe cause of the accident.On
July 28, the State Council investigation squadmade a preliminary report on
the cause,admitting that the design of the signal systemof Wenzhou South
Station had serious loopholes.It did not provide sufficient signalsto the
train that rear-ended in the way it was supposed to.
The accident cause announced by the authoritieshas put the signal system's
supplier,Splendor Science & Technology Co., Ltd.,under spotlight and
questioning.
Secretary of the Board of Directors of this company
Li Xinjian denied any direct links between the companyand the accident in
an interview with "First Financial Daily."He said the signal equipment in
the crashed trains,D3115 and D301, was not supplied by the company.
Nevertheless, this company has a 40% market sharein China's railway signal
industry,making it a focus of media focus and questioning.
Wu Wenxin, an automation engineer andformer VP of ABB in Germany:"With such
an intense competition,a company like Splendor can attain a 40% market
share.To me, it is unusually high, very high."
According to Splendor's 2010 financial report,Ping An Securities analyst Ma
Xianwen estimated thatit is hopeful for Splendor's market shareto increase
to 60% in 2011.
Wu Wenxin: How could Splendor attain such a market share?Did it obtain
orders by any illegal means?Of course, it is not possible for me to go to
Chinato conduct an investigation.Chinese anti-corruption officials should
pay attentionto any possible illegal conducts of this company,e.g.,
bribery, in order to obtain orders."
First Financial Daily also quoted informants saying that,
besides Splendor Science and Technology,other railway signal suppliers
includeSignal and Communication Research Institute,CASCO and Century Real
in Beijing.These four firms occupy nearly 50% ofthe market share in China.
Ye Tan, a columnist of British "Financial Times",has also noticed these
four companies.In an article, she revealed that Century Real,
an A-stock listed firm that monopolizesChina's rail security monitoring
system,is well connected to high-level officials in the railway systemand
enterprises owned by the CCP's central government.
The 2010 annual report of the Ministry of Railwaysindicated that, as of the
end of 2010,the total debt of the ministry amounted to RMB 1.89
trillion,which was a 45.14% increase from 2009.Its debt ratio was 57.44%.In
2010 alone, it lost RMB 77.2 billion.In 2011 Q1,it already went into a
deficit of RMB 3.76 billion.
In June 2011, associate director of transportation of theRailways Ministry,
Su Shunhu, was arrested for corruption.He is the 8th arrested high-ranking
official in this Ministryin the past year.
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Jing and Li Ruolin 2011-07-30
09:25:15http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566847.html.-【禁闻】动车事
故-信号领域垄断暴利露倪端.html
【禁闻】评论：中国高铁“大跃进”
【禁闻】评论：中国高铁"大跃进"
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】中国高速铁路为争世界第一，所谓�大干快上�只用了短
短五年，而这条�超英赶美�的高速铁路，却是在技术并不成熟的情况下开通的。有评
论认为，中共官员这种"大跃进"思维，注定了高铁铁轨下面即将到来的白骨累累！而且
是拿着老百姓的生命去换取中共的政绩与国际面子。
花了数万亿制造的中国高铁，竟然是弱不禁风的�林黛玉�。京沪高铁6月开通后，五
天内发生六起严重故障，7月23号温州又发生灾难性的动车追尾事故，死伤两百多
人，有和铁道系统做生意的网友透露，以中国现在的高铁技术和管理现状，中国高铁每
年运行的代价是300―400具尸体。
广东《南方都市报》的社论写道："在事故之前，中国高铁的'大跃进'早已遭受了强烈
的质疑，但回应质疑的除了蛮横的强力打压，给质疑者贴上非技术性的标签，就只剩下
了虚骄和傲慢。"
《扬子晚报》7月27号报导，一直担任�温州动车事故�死难者家属代表的杨峰，证实
受到压力，表示如果他再坚持（要真相），将"失去第六个亲人"，因此，对于开始保持
沉默他表示歉意。杨峰在这次�动车追尾事故�中痛失5位亲人。据报导，他与有关官
员会面后，态度发生180度大转变，拒绝再接受采访。
台湾�中央研究院�经济研究员孙明德主任向《新唐人》表示，基础建设等重大工
程，必须详细评估，尤其是复杂的高铁技术。
孙明德（台湾�中央研究院�经济研究员）：�但是因为他们很急着想把这个投资把它
落实，所以在评估过程中可能就人为的把它缩短了，或者是把它省略掉。这就造成他们
很多的公共建设现在都处于不安全的状态。�
�中国，就是一列在雷雨中狂奔的动车�作者徐先智写道：别人的一条高铁建设周期需
要6-7年，其中地基自然沉降至少需要2-3年，而我国高铁一年便建成通车了。
香港《明报》的社论表示："从京沪高铁开通运营后暴露出的问题来看，既有大型综合
工程项目建成之初磨合期都会面临的通病，也有好大喜功、急功近利和不重质量、忽视
细节、重建设轻管理等中国特色弊端。"
�美国对华援助协会�会长傅希秋表示，中国高铁也具有�腐败世界第一�特色。
傅希秋（�美国对华援助协会�会长）：�因为他们花的是纳税人的钱、腐败也是纳税
人的钱、然后呢，损害的也是纳税人。羊毛出在羊身上，如果钱被贪污了，那当然就出
现安全的隐患。我看（中共当局）没有什么任何的想改善的迹象，并且还打击民意。而
官员呢，可以坐飞机、他们有自己的专车、专列。�
《明报》社论说："我们冀望中国在建的高铁专案以及包括大客机研制、南水北调等大
型公共工程引以为戒：应该汲取形形色色'大跃进'的惨痛教训。
而傅希秋牧师也给予了中共忠告。
傅希秋：�我的忠告就是说，悬崖勒马！以民众的安全、生命作为最大的责任。我相信
这个事情敲响了（中共）警钟。�
新唐人记者刘惠、周平、王明宇采访报导。
Chinese Rail's "Great Leap Forward"
To become the world's number one,
the Chinese high-speed rail's "Great Leap Forward"only took five short
years.However, its operation started withoutits technology being
matured.Some commentators believe that
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials' mentality of"Great Leap
Forward" destined the passengers' deaths.They use the lives of citizens in
exchange forthe CCP's political achievement and international recognition.
The Chinese high-speed railway cost RMB trillionsto build, but it is
extremely fragile.After the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail opened in
June,six major incidents took place within five days.The disastrous
collision on July 23caused over 200 casualties.Netizens that conduct
business with the railway systemrevealed that with the current technology
and management,China's high-speed rail operatesat the price of 300-400
deaths per year.
Guangdong's Southern Metropolitan Daily editorial said,
"Even before the accident, the high-speed rail's'great leap forward' was
strongly doubted.However, the doubts were respondedwith intense suppression.
Yangzi Evening News reported on July 27,
the Wenzhou high-speed rail accident victims' families'representative Yang
Feng confirmed that he was pressured.He said that he was threatened that
if he insisted (on finding the truth),he would "lose his sixth family
member."For this reason,he apologized for being silent at the
beginning.Yang Feng lost five family members in this accident.
However, after meeting with some CCP officials,his attitude changed
dramatically and he refused interviews.
Taiwan's Academia Sinica's economics researcherSun Mingde told NTD
thatmajor infrastructure projects must be carefully assessed,especially the
complex high-speed rail technology.
Sun Mingde: However, because they were anxiousto make their construction
project start operation,so the assessment process was shortened or omitted.
This caused many of their pubic constructionsto be in a unsafe state.
Xu Xianzhi, author of the book"China: a High-Speed Rail Madly Rushing in
Thunderstorm","Others spend 6-7 years constructing a high-speed rail.The
foundation needs at least 2-3 years to settlement.However, Chinese-built
high-speed railwould start operation within one year.
Editorial of Hong Kong's Ming Pao wrote,
Issues after the rail started operation revealedthe common problems of
initial operation of complex projects.However, there were also problemsof
Chinese characteristics,such as unrealistic ambition, negligence of
quality,omission of details and insufficient management.
The director of China Aid Association Bob Fu said,
Chinese high-speed rail also has the characteristic of"the world's number
one corruption."
Bob Fu: Because they are spending taxpayers' money,embezzling taxpayers'
money and damaging the taxpayers.When the money is embezzled,safety hazards
become a obvious result.I see no sign of (the authorities')
improvement.They are still suppressing the public opinion.The officials can
take the plane;they have their private cars and private trains.
"Ming Pao" Editorial: We hope that the construction anddevelopment of major
public works, such as thehigh-speed rail, dams, passenger aircrafts can
learnfrom the painful lessons of the "great leap forward."
Pastor Bob Fu also gave this advice to the CCP.
Bob Fu: My advice is, to stop before it's too late!
Take the public safety and people's livesas the biggest responsibility.I
believe this incident sounded the alarm for the CCP.
NTD reporters Liu Hui, Zhou Ping and Wang Mingyu. 2011-07-30
08:56:08http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566845.html.-【禁闻】评
论：中国高铁"大跃进".html
【新唐人2011年7月30日讯】中国高速铁路为争世界第一，所谓�大干快上�只用了短
短五年，而这条�超英赶美�的高速铁路，却是在技术并不成熟的情况下开通的。有评
论认为，中共官员这种"大跃进"思维，注定了高铁铁轨下面即将到来的白骨累累！而且
是拿着老百姓的生命去换取中共的政绩与国际面子。
花了数万亿制造的中国高铁，竟然是弱不禁风的�林黛玉�。京沪高铁6月开通后，五
天内发生六起严重故障，7月23号温州又发生灾难性的动车追尾事故，死伤两百多
人，有和铁道系统做生意的网友透露，以中国现在的高铁技术和管理现状，中国高铁每
年运行的代价是300―400具尸体。
广东《南方都市报》的社论写道："在事故之前，中国高铁的'大跃进'早已遭受了强烈
的质疑，但回应质疑的除了蛮横的强力打压，给质疑者贴上非技术性的标签，就只剩下
了虚骄和傲慢。"
《扬子晚报》7月27号报导，一直担任�温州动车事故�死难者家属代表的杨峰，证实
受到压力，表示如果他再坚持（要真相），将"失去第六个亲人"，因此，对于开始保持
沉默他表示歉意。杨峰在这次�动车追尾事故�中痛失5位亲人。据报导，他与有关官
员会面后，态度发生180度大转变，拒绝再接受采访。
台湾�中央研究院�经济研究员孙明德主任向《新唐人》表示，基础建设等重大工
程，必须详细评估，尤其是复杂的高铁技术。
孙明德（台湾�中央研究院�经济研究员）：�但是因为他们很急着想把这个投资把它
落实，所以在评估过程中可能就人为的把它缩短了，或者是把它省略掉。这就造成他们
很多的公共建设现在都处于不安全的状态。�
�中国，就是一列在雷雨中狂奔的动车�作者徐先智写道：别人的一条高铁建设周期需
要6-7年，其中地基自然沉降至少需要2-3年，而我国高铁一年便建成通车了。
香港《明报》的社论表示："从京沪高铁开通运营后暴露出的问题来看，既有大型综合
工程项目建成之初磨合期都会面临的通病，也有好大喜功、急功近利和不重质量、忽视
细节、重建设轻管理等中国特色弊端。"
�美国对华援助协会�会长傅希秋表示，中国高铁也具有�腐败世界第一�特色。
傅希秋（�美国对华援助协会�会长）：�因为他们花的是纳税人的钱、腐败也是纳税
人的钱、然后呢，损害的也是纳税人。羊毛出在羊身上，如果钱被贪污了，那当然就出
现安全的隐患。我看（中共当局）没有什么任何的想改善的迹象，并且还打击民意。而
官员呢，可以坐飞机、他们有自己的专车、专列。�
《明报》社论说："我们冀望中国在建的高铁专案以及包括大客机研制、南水北调等大
型公共工程引以为戒：应该汲取形形色色'大跃进'的惨痛教训。
而傅希秋牧师也给予了中共忠告。
傅希秋：�我的忠告就是说，悬崖勒马！以民众的安全、生命作为最大的责任。我相信
这个事情敲响了（中共）警钟。�
新唐人记者刘惠、周平、王明宇采访报导。
Chinese Rail's "Great Leap Forward"
To become the world's number one,
the Chinese high-speed rail's "Great Leap Forward"only took five short
years.However, its operation started withoutits technology being
matured.Some commentators believe that
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials' mentality of"Great Leap
Forward" destined the passengers' deaths.They use the lives of citizens in
exchange forthe CCP's political achievement and international recognition.
The Chinese high-speed railway cost RMB trillionsto build, but it is
extremely fragile.After the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail opened in
June,six major incidents took place within five days.The disastrous
collision on July 23caused over 200 casualties.Netizens that conduct
business with the railway systemrevealed that with the current technology
and management,China's high-speed rail operatesat the price of 300-400
deaths per year.
Guangdong's Southern Metropolitan Daily editorial said,
"Even before the accident, the high-speed rail's'great leap forward' was
strongly doubted.However, the doubts were respondedwith intense suppression.
Yangzi Evening News reported on July 27,
the Wenzhou high-speed rail accident victims' families'representative Yang
Feng confirmed that he was pressured.He said that he was threatened that
if he insisted (on finding the truth),he would "lose his sixth family
member."For this reason,he apologized for being silent at the
beginning.Yang Feng lost five family members in this accident.
However, after meeting with some CCP officials,his attitude changed
dramatically and he refused interviews.
Taiwan's Academia Sinica's economics researcherSun Mingde told NTD
thatmajor infrastructure projects must be carefully assessed,especially the
complex high-speed rail technology.
Sun Mingde: However, because they were anxiousto make their construction
project start operation,so the assessment process was shortened or omitted.
This caused many of their pubic constructionsto be in a unsafe state.
Xu Xianzhi, author of the book"China: a High-Speed Rail Madly Rushing in
Thunderstorm","Others spend 6-7 years constructing a high-speed rail.The
foundation needs at least 2-3 years to settlement.However, Chinese-built
high-speed railwould start operation within one year.
Editorial of Hong Kong's Ming Pao wrote,
Issues after the rail started operation revealedthe common problems of
initial operation of complex projects.However, there were also problemsof
Chinese characteristics,such as unrealistic ambition, negligence of
quality,omission of details and insufficient management.
The director of China Aid Association Bob Fu said,
Chinese high-speed rail also has the characteristic of"the world's number
one corruption."
Bob Fu: Because they are spending taxpayers' money,embezzling taxpayers'
money and damaging the taxpayers.When the money is embezzled,safety hazards
become a obvious result.I see no sign of (the authorities')
improvement.They are still suppressing the public opinion.The officials can
take the plane;they have their private cars and private trains.
"Ming Pao" Editorial: We hope that the construction anddevelopment of major
public works, such as thehigh-speed rail, dams, passenger aircrafts can
learnfrom the painful lessons of the "great leap forward."
Pastor Bob Fu also gave this advice to the CCP.
Bob Fu: My advice is, to stop before it's too late!
Take the public safety and people's livesas the biggest responsibility.I
believe this incident sounded the alarm for the CCP.
NTD reporters Liu Hui, Zhou Ping and Wang Mingyu. 2011-07-30
08:56:08http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/30/a566845.html.-【禁闻】评
论：中国高铁"大跃进".html
【禁闻】高铁赶工献礼酿灾 惨案调查遭质疑
【禁闻】高铁赶工献礼酿灾 惨案调查遭质疑
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】�温州动车惨案�引发民怨沸腾，温家宝声称要进行公开
和透明的调查，外界对此表示质疑。与此同时，当局正在施压死难者家属接受过低的赔
偿。海内外人士和媒体批评中共当局草菅人命，为了向中共建党90周年献礼，高铁提前
2年完工，终于酿成人为的灾祸。
�7.23温州动车追尾相撞事故�吸引了海内外近百家媒体采访，创下近期国内突发事件
吸引媒体关注的新记录。连日来，在中宣部的指令下，中共党媒大量为当局救援歌功颂
德。
7月27号，香港《苹果日报》一篇�采访手记：悲剧当喜剧，温州上演慈善骚�指
出，记者耳闻目睹死难者家人痛不欲生，但这些画面和声音，极少出现在当地的电视广
播。
27号，一百多名遇难者家属在温州南站抗议，他们手举�还我真相、为民做主！�的横
幅，高呼口号。一名请愿家属说：�事故不是天灾，是人祸，我们认为是人为的，是调
度出问题！�
28号，温家宝来到温州看望遇难受伤者家属。他说，要给人民一个真诚负责任的调查交
代，如果发现背后隐藏着腐败问题，将依法处理，毫不手软。
李大同(中国青年报《冰点》周刊前主编)：�这老百姓你蒙不了，你拿老百姓的命当儿
戏，我想这现在已经越来越清楚了，民众越来越知道自己的利益在什么地方，越来越要
求公开、要求透明。但是现在愚蠢的官僚机构还没了解这一点，总是用最愚蠢的办法开
始，然后狼狈不堪的收场。�
《新华社》报导，最高检察院渎职侵权检察厅已派出两名专员，赶赴温州参与调查。维
权律师彭剑认为，这反映当局认为事故背后有刑事犯罪嫌疑。
当局调查坚称雷击是事故的原因，遭到许多业内专家的质疑。据网络统计，98%的民众
认为，当局刻意隐瞒动车事故的原因和伤亡人数真相。
李大同：�没有任何监督，本来京沪高铁按照工期它需要5年，提前2年抢什么呀？它抢
的就是90周年，什么共产党90周年献礼，它问题不出来才怪呢？包括质量、包括人员培
训，你抢那2年时间干什么？胡来！这个事没完。�
而当局正在向死难者家属施压，不同部门的官员采取密集游说的方式，要求家属一周内
接受赔偿协议，否则不许将遗体带走。
温州市司法局和律师协会26号向律师事务所下达指示，以�维护稳定�为由，禁止代理
死难者家属的案件。上海律师许王军质疑赔偿金额过低，一定会犯众怒。
《人民日报》28号在头版发表文章说，中国要发展，但不要带血的GDP。而人民日报旗
下《环球时报》25号的社评却声称：高铁是中国必须经历的自我折磨。
英国《金融时报》发表文章指出，�中国高铁之父�刘志军为发展高铁，给铁道部留下
了2万亿元债务，绑架了中国经济。法国财经报纸则担忧，高铁动车出轨可能导致中国
经济增长放缓。
新唐人记者周玉林、李元翰、肖颜采访报导。
Gift Became Tragedy
Wenzhou's high-speed train tragedy is creating resentmenttowards the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities.CCP's premier Wen Jiabao claims a
transparent investigationwill be opened, but the outside world is
skeptical.Authorities are pressuring the victims' familiesto accept very
low compensations.Media criticize the authorities' disregard for human life.
As a gift for the 90th anniversary of the CCP,the high-speed rail was
completed two years before schedule,leading to this man-made disaster.
The "7.23" rear-end collision of Wenzhou EMUattracted much media attention
in China and abroad,setting a new record for domestic incidents recently.
With China's Central Propaganda Department instructions,CCP media continues
praising the authorities' rescue work.
On July 27, Apple Daily in Hong Kong published an article'Tragedy Became
Comedy, Wenzhou Staged Charity Show.'It said that the reporter heard and
saw the grievancesof the victims' families,but those rarely appeared in the
local TV programs.
On July 27, more than 100 victims' families protestedin Wenzhou South
Station,with banners reading things like,"Give me my truth, take
responsibility for the people!"One petitioner said: "The accident was not a
natural disaster,but a man-made one. It was artificial, a scheduling
problem!"
On July 28, Wen Jiabao came to Wenzhouto visit the victims' families.He
said that the authorities would have an investigation.
If any corruption issues are found as the cause of the tragedy,he would
sentence them according to the law, without a mercy.
Li Datong,ex-editor of China Youth Daily's Bingdian magazine:"You (CCP) can
not deceive people anymore.
You take lives as a trifling matter.This is now becoming clearer.People are
increasingly aware of where CCP's interests are,and are demanding
disclosure and transparency.The stupid bureaucracy has not realized it yet.
They always start with this ignorant methodand end up in a sorry plight."
Xinhua News Agency reports,
the Supreme Procuratorate Malfeasance Prosecutor's Officehas sent two
commissioners to Wenzhou for investigation.Human Rights attorneyPeng Jian
said thatthis reflects crimes behind the accident.
The authorities' investigation reports insist on claimingthat lightning had
caused the accident.However, this has been questioned by many industry
experts.
According to online statistics,98% of those questioned believe
thatauthorities deliberately concealed the causeand the actual number of
casualties in the tragedy.
Li Datong: "Without any oversight, the Beijing-Shanghaihigh-speed rail
would take five years according to schedule.Why was it completed two years
earlier?So it can be ready for the CCP's 90th anniversary, as a gift.It
would've been strange if no problems were to come of it.This included
quality, personnel training.Why was it shortened to two years?These things
never end."
Authorities are exerting pressure on families of the victims.
Officials of different departments are intensively lobbyingto ask families
to accept compensation agreements in a week.If families don't accept the
agreements,they are not allowed to take away the bodies.
Wenzhou Bureau of Justice and the Attorney Associationgave instructions to
law firms on July 26,prohibiting them from taking up cases of victims,with
the excuse of "maintaining stability."Shanghai lawyer Xu Wangjun believes
that the compensationis too low, and it will cause public uproar.
People's Daily published headline news on July 28,
reporting that China needs development,but does not need "bloody
GDP."Global Times, under People's Daily, said in a commentaryon July 25,
"High-speed rail must go through self-torture."
British Financial Times published an article pointing outthat Liu Zhijun,
"the father of Chinese high-speed rail,"left a USD 2,000 billion debt to
the Ministry of Railways,kidnapping the Chinese economy.French financial
newspapers were concerned the derailmentcould cause a slowdown in China's
economic growth.
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Yuanhan and Xiao Yan 2011-07-29
10:40:26http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566352.html.-【禁闻】高铁赶
工献礼酿灾-惨案调查遭质疑.html
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】�温州动车惨案�引发民怨沸腾，温家宝声称要进行公开
和透明的调查，外界对此表示质疑。与此同时，当局正在施压死难者家属接受过低的赔
偿。海内外人士和媒体批评中共当局草菅人命，为了向中共建党90周年献礼，高铁提前
2年完工，终于酿成人为的灾祸。
�7.23温州动车追尾相撞事故�吸引了海内外近百家媒体采访，创下近期国内突发事件
吸引媒体关注的新记录。连日来，在中宣部的指令下，中共党媒大量为当局救援歌功颂
德。
7月27号，香港《苹果日报》一篇�采访手记：悲剧当喜剧，温州上演慈善骚�指
出，记者耳闻目睹死难者家人痛不欲生，但这些画面和声音，极少出现在当地的电视广
播。
27号，一百多名遇难者家属在温州南站抗议，他们手举�还我真相、为民做主！�的横
幅，高呼口号。一名请愿家属说：�事故不是天灾，是人祸，我们认为是人为的，是调
度出问题！�
28号，温家宝来到温州看望遇难受伤者家属。他说，要给人民一个真诚负责任的调查交
代，如果发现背后隐藏着腐败问题，将依法处理，毫不手软。
李大同(中国青年报《冰点》周刊前主编)：�这老百姓你蒙不了，你拿老百姓的命当儿
戏，我想这现在已经越来越清楚了，民众越来越知道自己的利益在什么地方，越来越要
求公开、要求透明。但是现在愚蠢的官僚机构还没了解这一点，总是用最愚蠢的办法开
始，然后狼狈不堪的收场。�
《新华社》报导，最高检察院渎职侵权检察厅已派出两名专员，赶赴温州参与调查。维
权律师彭剑认为，这反映当局认为事故背后有刑事犯罪嫌疑。
当局调查坚称雷击是事故的原因，遭到许多业内专家的质疑。据网络统计，98%的民众
认为，当局刻意隐瞒动车事故的原因和伤亡人数真相。
李大同：�没有任何监督，本来京沪高铁按照工期它需要5年，提前2年抢什么呀？它抢
的就是90周年，什么共产党90周年献礼，它问题不出来才怪呢？包括质量、包括人员培
训，你抢那2年时间干什么？胡来！这个事没完。�
而当局正在向死难者家属施压，不同部门的官员采取密集游说的方式，要求家属一周内
接受赔偿协议，否则不许将遗体带走。
温州市司法局和律师协会26号向律师事务所下达指示，以�维护稳定�为由，禁止代理
死难者家属的案件。上海律师许王军质疑赔偿金额过低，一定会犯众怒。
《人民日报》28号在头版发表文章说，中国要发展，但不要带血的GDP。而人民日报旗
下《环球时报》25号的社评却声称：高铁是中国必须经历的自我折磨。
英国《金融时报》发表文章指出，�中国高铁之父�刘志军为发展高铁，给铁道部留下
了2万亿元债务，绑架了中国经济。法国财经报纸则担忧，高铁动车出轨可能导致中国
经济增长放缓。
新唐人记者周玉林、李元翰、肖颜采访报导。
Gift Became Tragedy
Wenzhou's high-speed train tragedy is creating resentmenttowards the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities.CCP's premier Wen Jiabao claims a
transparent investigationwill be opened, but the outside world is
skeptical.Authorities are pressuring the victims' familiesto accept very
low compensations.Media criticize the authorities' disregard for human life.
As a gift for the 90th anniversary of the CCP,the high-speed rail was
completed two years before schedule,leading to this man-made disaster.
The "7.23" rear-end collision of Wenzhou EMUattracted much media attention
in China and abroad,setting a new record for domestic incidents recently.
With China's Central Propaganda Department instructions,CCP media continues
praising the authorities' rescue work.
On July 27, Apple Daily in Hong Kong published an article'Tragedy Became
Comedy, Wenzhou Staged Charity Show.'It said that the reporter heard and
saw the grievancesof the victims' families,but those rarely appeared in the
local TV programs.
On July 27, more than 100 victims' families protestedin Wenzhou South
Station,with banners reading things like,"Give me my truth, take
responsibility for the people!"One petitioner said: "The accident was not a
natural disaster,but a man-made one. It was artificial, a scheduling
problem!"
On July 28, Wen Jiabao came to Wenzhouto visit the victims' families.He
said that the authorities would have an investigation.
If any corruption issues are found as the cause of the tragedy,he would
sentence them according to the law, without a mercy.
Li Datong,ex-editor of China Youth Daily's Bingdian magazine:"You (CCP) can
not deceive people anymore.
You take lives as a trifling matter.This is now becoming clearer.People are
increasingly aware of where CCP's interests are,and are demanding
disclosure and transparency.The stupid bureaucracy has not realized it yet.
They always start with this ignorant methodand end up in a sorry plight."
Xinhua News Agency reports,
the Supreme Procuratorate Malfeasance Prosecutor's Officehas sent two
commissioners to Wenzhou for investigation.Human Rights attorneyPeng Jian
said thatthis reflects crimes behind the accident.
The authorities' investigation reports insist on claimingthat lightning had
caused the accident.However, this has been questioned by many industry
experts.
According to online statistics,98% of those questioned believe
thatauthorities deliberately concealed the causeand the actual number of
casualties in the tragedy.
Li Datong: "Without any oversight, the Beijing-Shanghaihigh-speed rail
would take five years according to schedule.Why was it completed two years
earlier?So it can be ready for the CCP's 90th anniversary, as a gift.It
would've been strange if no problems were to come of it.This included
quality, personnel training.Why was it shortened to two years?These things
never end."
Authorities are exerting pressure on families of the victims.
Officials of different departments are intensively lobbyingto ask families
to accept compensation agreements in a week.If families don't accept the
agreements,they are not allowed to take away the bodies.
Wenzhou Bureau of Justice and the Attorney Associationgave instructions to
law firms on July 26,prohibiting them from taking up cases of victims,with
the excuse of "maintaining stability."Shanghai lawyer Xu Wangjun believes
that the compensationis too low, and it will cause public uproar.
People's Daily published headline news on July 28,
reporting that China needs development,but does not need "bloody
GDP."Global Times, under People's Daily, said in a commentaryon July 25,
"High-speed rail must go through self-torture."
British Financial Times published an article pointing outthat Liu Zhijun,
"the father of Chinese high-speed rail,"left a USD 2,000 billion debt to
the Ministry of Railways,kidnapping the Chinese economy.French financial
newspapers were concerned the derailmentcould cause a slowdown in China's
economic growth.
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Yuanhan and Xiao Yan 2011-07-29
10:40:26http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566352.html.-【禁闻】高铁赶
工献礼酿灾-惨案调查遭质疑.html
【禁闻】动车惨剧对比中共时代广场广告
【禁闻】动车惨剧对比中共时代广场广告
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】继上半年，中共斥巨资在纽约�时报广场�滚动播放所谓
�形象广告片�之后，中共喉舌媒体《新华社》，近期又租下纽约�时代广场�一块黄
金位置的巨型电视广告牌，将于下周一开始播放广告。中共希望在国际上树立形象，但
是评论者指出，�温州动车惨剧�对国家形象的损害，却是多少金钱都弥补不了的。
BBC报导，《新华社》租的这块液晶显示幕广告牌，高18米，宽12米，位于�时代广场
�的北端。每天大约有50万人经过这一地区。广告牌位置原为�汇丰银行�租用，但�
汇丰银行�在上个月租期到期后没有续租。
《新华社》租下这块广告牌，被认为是中共改善国家形象，树立中国品牌的又一次努
力。
原北京大学法律系讲师王天成表示，共产党的广告宣传无法改善自身的形象，因为全世
界都看到他的专制和恶劣的人权。他说，当这种宣传和实际情况如果形成反差，反而会
激起更多人的厌恶。
王天成（原北京大学法律系讲师）：�与其做这种面子工程，还不如真的把自己的脸搞
得好看一点，改善一下人权状况，启动政治改革。你看最近发生的高铁追尾事件，他对
中国的国家形象损害多大啊。那么多人关注，他就草草了事。事故还没进行调查，就先
把证据给毁了。�
曾经担任�中国改革杂志社�新闻部主任，和《纽约时报》北京分社新闻助理的赵岩分
析说，中共企图在世界上抢夺话语权。他举例说，去年中共收购美国《新闻周刊》没有
成功，现在又到�时代广场�投放广告，而被称为�海外央视�的《凤凰卫视》，最近
也在纳斯达克上市。赵岩提醒美国政府注意中共的文化和政治渗透。
赵岩（资深媒体人）：�国际外交是要对等的。那么美国的什么媒体可以在中国上市
呢？美国的CNN和我所在过的《纽约时报》可以拿到上海去上市吗？我想胡锦涛一定会
说不可以。那么为什么《凤凰台》可以到美国来上市呢？现在如果《纽约时报》到王府
井去，或到天安门广场去，搞一个巨大的屏幕，他肯卖吗？他也不肯卖给《纽约时报
》。�
赵岩建议美国政府，在允许中国的媒体和广告进入�时代广场�的同时，要求中共当局
以同样的权利，对美国的新闻和美国的广告加以开放。
另外，赵岩认为，如果《新华社》新租的看板，仍然遵循今年年初使用体育明星和娱乐
明星，来代言国家形象的思路，那就是浪费纳税人的钱。
赵岩：�国家的形象和软实力不是通过这样的广告来搞的。国家的软实力是通过几个方
面来进行的。要通过你的教育，通过你的意识形态，通过你的外交，等等一系列的问题
来表现。�
赵岩批评那些被用来代表中国形象的娱乐明星，基本上都是愿意当奴隶的中国人的形象
展，根本代表不了中国人的脊梁和中国人真正的精神。
而BBC的报导还说，《新华社》自1971年起，就在美国开设了《新华社》分社。《新华
社》五月份将北美的总部，从纽约的皇后区搬到了�时代广场�。据《凤凰网》的报
导，广告牌业主拒绝透露《新华社》付出的租金价格。但据了解，�时代广场�最优质
的广告位置租金，可以高达每月30万到40万美金。
新唐人记者秦雪、薛莉采访报导。
Xinhua's Times Square LCD Whitewash
Earlier this year Chinese Communist Party (CCP) broadcastedthe costly
scrolling "branding commercials".Now CCP's Xinhua is leasing a big screen
on Times Square,and will be playing ads starting from next week.CCP aims to
improve its global image.
Experts remind us thatmoney can't whitewash the late high-speed railway
tragedy.
According to BBC, the LCD screen leased by Xinhua,is 18m tall, 12m wide,
located at Times Square's north end.Half a million people pass through this
area everyday.
The space was leased by HSBC, which didn't renew its leaseafter the lease
expired last month.
Renting this ad space is seen as another effortto burnish CCP's image and
popularize itself overseas.
Former Peking University Law lecturer Wang Tiancheng said,CCP's propaganda
will not improve its image.The whole world is witnessing its autocracyand
worsening human rights record.He said, when the propaganda is different
from reality,it will evoke even more negative thoughts.
Wang Tiancheng: "Instead of building a vanity project,
it is better to change itself, to improve the human rights,and to initiate
political reform.Look at the recent high-speed rail disaster.How bad it
makes the country look.You (CCP) handled it hastily before so many peoples'
eyes.Evidence was destroyed without any formal investigation."
Former "China Reform Magazine" news department director,New York Times'
Beijing news assistant Zhao Yan analyzesthat CCP is trying to establish its
presence abroad.
They failed to buy Newsweek last year,now they are trying to advertise on
Times Square.In addition, the Phoenix TV known as the "overseas CCTV"became
listed on Nasdaq recently.Zhao Yan is warning the US governmentto be aware
of CCP's cultural and political infiltration.
Zhao Yan: "International diplomacy is based on fairness.Which American
media is listed on Chinese Stock market?Can CNN and New York Times be
listed in Shanghai?I think Hu Jintao will say no.Then why is Phoenix TV
listed in US?
Now if New York Times wants to advertise on a big screenin Wangfujing or
Tiananmen will they let them? They'll not."
Zhao Yan suggests now when the US government permitsthe CCP media and ads
to come to Time Square,they should request from China equal rightsto open
up access to American media and advertisements.
Zhao Yan thinks also that if Xinhua still featuresfamous athletes and
celebrities on its ads as earlier in the year,in order to uplift and
promote the CCP's image,then this is a waste of the tax payers' money.
Zhao Yan: "A country's image and strengthsare not to be promoted by
advertisements like this.A country's soft powers are shown through its
education,ideology and diplomacy."
Zhao criticizes the celebrities promoting CCP's image,which shows that the
Chinese are willing to be enslaved.This is not the Chinese's true spirit.
According to BBC, Xinhua had an office in US since 1971.In May, Xinhua
moved its US headquarters to Times Square.Phoenix.net said that the company
leasing this ad spacehad refused to disclose the cost of the lease.Based on
estimates, such an ad location on Times Squarewould cost in the range of
USD 0.3 to 0.4 million per month.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xue Li 2011-07-29
11:02:54http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566351.html.-【禁闻】动车惨
剧对比中共时代广场广告.html
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】继上半年，中共斥巨资在纽约�时报广场�滚动播放所谓
�形象广告片�之后，中共喉舌媒体《新华社》，近期又租下纽约�时代广场�一块黄
金位置的巨型电视广告牌，将于下周一开始播放广告。中共希望在国际上树立形象，但
是评论者指出，�温州动车惨剧�对国家形象的损害，却是多少金钱都弥补不了的。
BBC报导，《新华社》租的这块液晶显示幕广告牌，高18米，宽12米，位于�时代广场
�的北端。每天大约有50万人经过这一地区。广告牌位置原为�汇丰银行�租用，但�
汇丰银行�在上个月租期到期后没有续租。
《新华社》租下这块广告牌，被认为是中共改善国家形象，树立中国品牌的又一次努
力。
原北京大学法律系讲师王天成表示，共产党的广告宣传无法改善自身的形象，因为全世
界都看到他的专制和恶劣的人权。他说，当这种宣传和实际情况如果形成反差，反而会
激起更多人的厌恶。
王天成（原北京大学法律系讲师）：�与其做这种面子工程，还不如真的把自己的脸搞
得好看一点，改善一下人权状况，启动政治改革。你看最近发生的高铁追尾事件，他对
中国的国家形象损害多大啊。那么多人关注，他就草草了事。事故还没进行调查，就先
把证据给毁了。�
曾经担任�中国改革杂志社�新闻部主任，和《纽约时报》北京分社新闻助理的赵岩分
析说，中共企图在世界上抢夺话语权。他举例说，去年中共收购美国《新闻周刊》没有
成功，现在又到�时代广场�投放广告，而被称为�海外央视�的《凤凰卫视》，最近
也在纳斯达克上市。赵岩提醒美国政府注意中共的文化和政治渗透。
赵岩（资深媒体人）：�国际外交是要对等的。那么美国的什么媒体可以在中国上市
呢？美国的CNN和我所在过的《纽约时报》可以拿到上海去上市吗？我想胡锦涛一定会
说不可以。那么为什么《凤凰台》可以到美国来上市呢？现在如果《纽约时报》到王府
井去，或到天安门广场去，搞一个巨大的屏幕，他肯卖吗？他也不肯卖给《纽约时报
》。�
赵岩建议美国政府，在允许中国的媒体和广告进入�时代广场�的同时，要求中共当局
以同样的权利，对美国的新闻和美国的广告加以开放。
另外，赵岩认为，如果《新华社》新租的看板，仍然遵循今年年初使用体育明星和娱乐
明星，来代言国家形象的思路，那就是浪费纳税人的钱。
赵岩：�国家的形象和软实力不是通过这样的广告来搞的。国家的软实力是通过几个方
面来进行的。要通过你的教育，通过你的意识形态，通过你的外交，等等一系列的问题
来表现。�
赵岩批评那些被用来代表中国形象的娱乐明星，基本上都是愿意当奴隶的中国人的形象
展，根本代表不了中国人的脊梁和中国人真正的精神。
而BBC的报导还说，《新华社》自1971年起，就在美国开设了《新华社》分社。《新华
社》五月份将北美的总部，从纽约的皇后区搬到了�时代广场�。据《凤凰网》的报
导，广告牌业主拒绝透露《新华社》付出的租金价格。但据了解，�时代广场�最优质
的广告位置租金，可以高达每月30万到40万美金。
新唐人记者秦雪、薛莉采访报导。
Xinhua's Times Square LCD Whitewash
Earlier this year Chinese Communist Party (CCP) broadcastedthe costly
scrolling "branding commercials".Now CCP's Xinhua is leasing a big screen
on Times Square,and will be playing ads starting from next week.CCP aims to
improve its global image.
Experts remind us thatmoney can't whitewash the late high-speed railway
tragedy.
According to BBC, the LCD screen leased by Xinhua,is 18m tall, 12m wide,
located at Times Square's north end.Half a million people pass through this
area everyday.
The space was leased by HSBC, which didn't renew its leaseafter the lease
expired last month.
Renting this ad space is seen as another effortto burnish CCP's image and
popularize itself overseas.
Former Peking University Law lecturer Wang Tiancheng said,CCP's propaganda
will not improve its image.The whole world is witnessing its autocracyand
worsening human rights record.He said, when the propaganda is different
from reality,it will evoke even more negative thoughts.
Wang Tiancheng: "Instead of building a vanity project,
it is better to change itself, to improve the human rights,and to initiate
political reform.Look at the recent high-speed rail disaster.How bad it
makes the country look.You (CCP) handled it hastily before so many peoples'
eyes.Evidence was destroyed without any formal investigation."
Former "China Reform Magazine" news department director,New York Times'
Beijing news assistant Zhao Yan analyzesthat CCP is trying to establish its
presence abroad.
They failed to buy Newsweek last year,now they are trying to advertise on
Times Square.In addition, the Phoenix TV known as the "overseas CCTV"became
listed on Nasdaq recently.Zhao Yan is warning the US governmentto be aware
of CCP's cultural and political infiltration.
Zhao Yan: "International diplomacy is based on fairness.Which American
media is listed on Chinese Stock market?Can CNN and New York Times be
listed in Shanghai?I think Hu Jintao will say no.Then why is Phoenix TV
listed in US?
Now if New York Times wants to advertise on a big screenin Wangfujing or
Tiananmen will they let them? They'll not."
Zhao Yan suggests now when the US government permitsthe CCP media and ads
to come to Time Square,they should request from China equal rightsto open
up access to American media and advertisements.
Zhao Yan thinks also that if Xinhua still featuresfamous athletes and
celebrities on its ads as earlier in the year,in order to uplift and
promote the CCP's image,then this is a waste of the tax payers' money.
Zhao Yan: "A country's image and strengthsare not to be promoted by
advertisements like this.A country's soft powers are shown through its
education,ideology and diplomacy."
Zhao criticizes the celebrities promoting CCP's image,which shows that the
Chinese are willing to be enslaved.This is not the Chinese's true spirit.
According to BBC, Xinhua had an office in US since 1971.In May, Xinhua
moved its US headquarters to Times Square.Phoenix.net said that the company
leasing this ad spacehad refused to disclose the cost of the lease.Based on
estimates, such an ad location on Times Squarewould cost in the range of
USD 0.3 to 0.4 million per month.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xue Li 2011-07-29
11:02:54http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566351.html.-【禁闻】动车惨
剧对比中共时代广场广告.html
2011年7月28日星期四
【禁闻】中国改装航母欲试水 外界反应不一
【禁闻】中国改装航母欲试水 外界反应不一
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】中共国防部7月27号表示，一艘已经可以进行海上试航的航
空母舰将用于科研、实验和培训。专家评论认为，中共改装�航母�只在�军事威慑力
�方面有像征意义。存在重大缺陷的�航母�先天不足，更像是军事的面子工程。
今年6月，中共通过香港媒体透露军方改建航空母舰的消息后，引起各方关注，国防部
新闻发言人因此公开讯息。这也说明，1998年从乌克兰购买的"瓦良格"号被改装成中国
的第一艘�航母�。国防部还说，中国的国防政策不会因为发展�航母�而改变。
不过，中共军方的表态外界解读不一。
《法新社》认为，中共当局有关�航母�用途的表态，是有意淡化中国�航母�的军事
威慑效应，以避免刺激不稳定的南海局势。
中国长期与日本存在钓鱼岛主权争议外，最近与越南和菲律宾等国，也出现南中国海区
域归属问题的摩擦，气氛一度紧张。
时事评论员文昭认为，中共的航空母舰在南中国海作用其实有限，而且，不是说有了航
空母舰，南沙群岛就回归了。
文昭："目前多数军事专家对中共造航空母舰没有太多的担心，因为他要真正形成一个
有效的战斗力可能需要10年。航空母舰实际作用不像外界想像的那么大，第一，中国造
的航空母舰不能马上用，而且它受限制很多，它缺少本土外的军需港口。第二，一艘航
空母舰还不见得打得过人家。如果造的很多的话，国际社会又会制约他，不让他用。"
文昭表示，中国模仿苏联老大哥的军事发展路线，但为苏联的海军赢得军事大国地位的
是�核潜艇�而不是�航空母舰�。中共发展�航母�实际上是给国际上看的，把它作
为民族主义的一种图腾，作为一个大国崛起的一个像征。所以航空母舰更像是军事上的
面子工程。
文昭："如果中国造核潜艇，一艘航空母舰的成本至少可以造三艘核潜艇，而且更实
用。但是潜在水下的核潜艇和浮在水面上的航空母舰，远洋航空母舰这种庞然大物更加
适合做民族主义的图腾，用来凝聚士气。"
香港《东方日报》也以"畏畏缩缩建航母战战兢兢称大国"为题，对中共国防部的发言发
表了评论。文章写到："号称国力全球第二的中国，连造一艘航空母舰尚且如此畏畏缩
缩，无胆光明正大的打出旗号。"
其实，中共军方一开始改装乌克兰的"瓦良格"号，就受到了质疑声。
加拿大军事评论员平可夫就认为，"瓦良格"本身设计存在巨大缺陷，中共海军还复制上
世纪70年代苏联的老旧设计，令人费解。
那么，"瓦良格"号存在的巨大缺陷有哪些呢？
美国军事专家埃克斯在《连线杂志》撰文说，"瓦良格"航母舰载机编队战力不足，歼
-15战机逊于美军F-18超级大黄蜂，而且还没有先进的电子战机、舰载运输机和固定翼
预警机；"瓦良格"航母的自我防卫能力也极其脆弱，缺少足量的潜艇和战舰护航；更致
命的是，中国一直没有解决自行研制先进发动机的问题。
"瓦良格"号船龄已超过三十年，且通讯、电子系统为中共军方重建，与最初自日本采购
列车、再自行研发讯号等运行系统的高铁情况相近。因此有网民说，希望中国航母能于
万无一失的情况下启航，勿重演高铁悲剧，以免再成国际笑话。
新唐人记者刘惠、宋风、王明宇采访报导。
China Remodeled Aircraft Carrier
On July 27, the Ministry of National Defense ofthe Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) said thatan experimental aircraft carrier is being used forscientific
research and training.Experts noted that the CCP remodeled the aircraft
carrierto show military might.However, the carrier's poor quality proved
thatthe CCP launched the carrier as a military "face project."
The CCP released the news of its aircraft carrier remodelingproject in June
2011, via the Hong Kong media.Later, China's National Defense Department
(NDD) spokesmanpublicized the story,noting that the Varyag, China's first
aircraft carrier,was purchased from Ukraine in 1998.The NDD also said that
China's national defense policywill not be affected by the aircraft carrier.
However, there are different interpretations ofthe NDD's comments.
According to AFP, the CCP's statement about the carrierwas an attempt to
defuse its military significance,to keep peace amongits neighbors in the
South China Sea.
China not only has a long-standing sovereignty issuewith Japan regarding
the Diaoyu Islands,but also has similar issues in the South Chinese Seawith
Vietnam and the Philippines.
Current issue commentator Wen Zhao said thatthe impact of the aircraft
carrier is very limited.Also, there is no guarantee that China can
successfully defendits sovereignty claims over the Spratly Islands with the
carrier.
Wen Zhao: Most military experts are not worriedabout this aircraft
carrier.It's been said that it could take another 10 years of workto make
the carrier combat-worthy.The aircraft carrier is in fact less powerful
than it seems.
Firstly, Chinese-made aircraft carriers cannot be put to useright away, as
there is no munitions port outside of China.Secondly, with one aircraft
carrier in its arsenal,China's navy is less likely to gain a military
advantage.If the CCP produces more of these carriers,the international
community will strongly object.
Wen Zhao says the CCP is followingthe same military strategy as the former
Soviet Union did.However, the latter gained its global military advantage
byemploying the nuclear submarine, not an aircraft carrier.The CCP wants to
show off its growing military strengthwith this aircraft carrier, thus
fostering China's nationalism.The carrier is more of a prestige project.
Wen Zhao:"It's more pragmatic to make nuclear submarines,knowing that one
aircraft carrier costs three timesthe price of a nuclear submarine.A giant
aircraft carrier can certainly help boost the moralein China, more than an
underwater submarine can.
Hong Kong's Oriental Daily published the article,"Hesitating Aircraft
Carrier, Worrying Nation,"which commented on the statement ofChina's
National Defense Department statement.The article said, "Enjoying the
prestige of being calledthe second most militarily powerful nation in the
world,China is fearful even when making an aircraft carrier.
The retrofitting of the Varyag by the CCP militarywas called into question,
right from the beginning.
Andrei Pinkov, a Canadian military critic, says thatthe Varyag has massive
innate design flaw issues.Thus, it's strange that China's navywould use an
out-of-date Soviet-era vessel made in the 1970s.
What are some of the Varyag's major design flaws?
The Wired magazine quoted U.S. military expert, Aix,as saying that the
Varyag has insufficient combat effectiveness.China's F-15 fighters are
inferior to the U.S. F/A-18 Hornet.
Also they have no advanced electronic fighter jets,carrier transport planes
or fixed-wing AWACS.Basically, the Varyag has a poor self-defense
system,with only a small fleet of submarines and warships.What's more,China
is unable to produce advanced engines.
The Varyag is a 30-year-old vessel with communication andelectronic systems
that were rebuilt by the CCP.It is similar to the CCP's purchase of a
high-speed Japanesetrain, where the CCP developed its safety signal
system.Netizens taunted the CCP, saying that they hope China'saircraft
carrier could set sail with a firm safety guarantee,so as not to duplicate
the tragedies of its high-speed trains.
NTD reporters Liu Hui, Song Feng and Wang Mingyu 2011-07-29
07:38:39http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566317.html.-【禁闻】中国改
装航母欲试水-外界反应不一.html
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】中共国防部7月27号表示，一艘已经可以进行海上试航的航
空母舰将用于科研、实验和培训。专家评论认为，中共改装�航母�只在�军事威慑力
�方面有像征意义。存在重大缺陷的�航母�先天不足，更像是军事的面子工程。
今年6月，中共通过香港媒体透露军方改建航空母舰的消息后，引起各方关注，国防部
新闻发言人因此公开讯息。这也说明，1998年从乌克兰购买的"瓦良格"号被改装成中国
的第一艘�航母�。国防部还说，中国的国防政策不会因为发展�航母�而改变。
不过，中共军方的表态外界解读不一。
《法新社》认为，中共当局有关�航母�用途的表态，是有意淡化中国�航母�的军事
威慑效应，以避免刺激不稳定的南海局势。
中国长期与日本存在钓鱼岛主权争议外，最近与越南和菲律宾等国，也出现南中国海区
域归属问题的摩擦，气氛一度紧张。
时事评论员文昭认为，中共的航空母舰在南中国海作用其实有限，而且，不是说有了航
空母舰，南沙群岛就回归了。
文昭："目前多数军事专家对中共造航空母舰没有太多的担心，因为他要真正形成一个
有效的战斗力可能需要10年。航空母舰实际作用不像外界想像的那么大，第一，中国造
的航空母舰不能马上用，而且它受限制很多，它缺少本土外的军需港口。第二，一艘航
空母舰还不见得打得过人家。如果造的很多的话，国际社会又会制约他，不让他用。"
文昭表示，中国模仿苏联老大哥的军事发展路线，但为苏联的海军赢得军事大国地位的
是�核潜艇�而不是�航空母舰�。中共发展�航母�实际上是给国际上看的，把它作
为民族主义的一种图腾，作为一个大国崛起的一个像征。所以航空母舰更像是军事上的
面子工程。
文昭："如果中国造核潜艇，一艘航空母舰的成本至少可以造三艘核潜艇，而且更实
用。但是潜在水下的核潜艇和浮在水面上的航空母舰，远洋航空母舰这种庞然大物更加
适合做民族主义的图腾，用来凝聚士气。"
香港《东方日报》也以"畏畏缩缩建航母战战兢兢称大国"为题，对中共国防部的发言发
表了评论。文章写到："号称国力全球第二的中国，连造一艘航空母舰尚且如此畏畏缩
缩，无胆光明正大的打出旗号。"
其实，中共军方一开始改装乌克兰的"瓦良格"号，就受到了质疑声。
加拿大军事评论员平可夫就认为，"瓦良格"本身设计存在巨大缺陷，中共海军还复制上
世纪70年代苏联的老旧设计，令人费解。
那么，"瓦良格"号存在的巨大缺陷有哪些呢？
美国军事专家埃克斯在《连线杂志》撰文说，"瓦良格"航母舰载机编队战力不足，歼
-15战机逊于美军F-18超级大黄蜂，而且还没有先进的电子战机、舰载运输机和固定翼
预警机；"瓦良格"航母的自我防卫能力也极其脆弱，缺少足量的潜艇和战舰护航；更致
命的是，中国一直没有解决自行研制先进发动机的问题。
"瓦良格"号船龄已超过三十年，且通讯、电子系统为中共军方重建，与最初自日本采购
列车、再自行研发讯号等运行系统的高铁情况相近。因此有网民说，希望中国航母能于
万无一失的情况下启航，勿重演高铁悲剧，以免再成国际笑话。
新唐人记者刘惠、宋风、王明宇采访报导。
China Remodeled Aircraft Carrier
On July 27, the Ministry of National Defense ofthe Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) said thatan experimental aircraft carrier is being used forscientific
research and training.Experts noted that the CCP remodeled the aircraft
carrierto show military might.However, the carrier's poor quality proved
thatthe CCP launched the carrier as a military "face project."
The CCP released the news of its aircraft carrier remodelingproject in June
2011, via the Hong Kong media.Later, China's National Defense Department
(NDD) spokesmanpublicized the story,noting that the Varyag, China's first
aircraft carrier,was purchased from Ukraine in 1998.The NDD also said that
China's national defense policywill not be affected by the aircraft carrier.
However, there are different interpretations ofthe NDD's comments.
According to AFP, the CCP's statement about the carrierwas an attempt to
defuse its military significance,to keep peace amongits neighbors in the
South China Sea.
China not only has a long-standing sovereignty issuewith Japan regarding
the Diaoyu Islands,but also has similar issues in the South Chinese Seawith
Vietnam and the Philippines.
Current issue commentator Wen Zhao said thatthe impact of the aircraft
carrier is very limited.Also, there is no guarantee that China can
successfully defendits sovereignty claims over the Spratly Islands with the
carrier.
Wen Zhao: Most military experts are not worriedabout this aircraft
carrier.It's been said that it could take another 10 years of workto make
the carrier combat-worthy.The aircraft carrier is in fact less powerful
than it seems.
Firstly, Chinese-made aircraft carriers cannot be put to useright away, as
there is no munitions port outside of China.Secondly, with one aircraft
carrier in its arsenal,China's navy is less likely to gain a military
advantage.If the CCP produces more of these carriers,the international
community will strongly object.
Wen Zhao says the CCP is followingthe same military strategy as the former
Soviet Union did.However, the latter gained its global military advantage
byemploying the nuclear submarine, not an aircraft carrier.The CCP wants to
show off its growing military strengthwith this aircraft carrier, thus
fostering China's nationalism.The carrier is more of a prestige project.
Wen Zhao:"It's more pragmatic to make nuclear submarines,knowing that one
aircraft carrier costs three timesthe price of a nuclear submarine.A giant
aircraft carrier can certainly help boost the moralein China, more than an
underwater submarine can.
Hong Kong's Oriental Daily published the article,"Hesitating Aircraft
Carrier, Worrying Nation,"which commented on the statement ofChina's
National Defense Department statement.The article said, "Enjoying the
prestige of being calledthe second most militarily powerful nation in the
world,China is fearful even when making an aircraft carrier.
The retrofitting of the Varyag by the CCP militarywas called into question,
right from the beginning.
Andrei Pinkov, a Canadian military critic, says thatthe Varyag has massive
innate design flaw issues.Thus, it's strange that China's navywould use an
out-of-date Soviet-era vessel made in the 1970s.
What are some of the Varyag's major design flaws?
The Wired magazine quoted U.S. military expert, Aix,as saying that the
Varyag has insufficient combat effectiveness.China's F-15 fighters are
inferior to the U.S. F/A-18 Hornet.
Also they have no advanced electronic fighter jets,carrier transport planes
or fixed-wing AWACS.Basically, the Varyag has a poor self-defense
system,with only a small fleet of submarines and warships.What's more,China
is unable to produce advanced engines.
The Varyag is a 30-year-old vessel with communication andelectronic systems
that were rebuilt by the CCP.It is similar to the CCP's purchase of a
high-speed Japanesetrain, where the CCP developed its safety signal
system.Netizens taunted the CCP, saying that they hope China'saircraft
carrier could set sail with a firm safety guarantee,so as not to duplicate
the tragedies of its high-speed trains.
NTD reporters Liu Hui, Song Feng and Wang Mingyu 2011-07-29
07:38:39http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566317.html.-【禁闻】中国改
装航母欲试水-外界反应不一.html
【禁闻论坛】中国人，你为什么不生气？
【禁闻论坛】中国人，你为什么不生气？
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】【禁闻论坛】中国人，你为什么不生气？
中国人, 你为什么不生气?
安妮：您好！观众朋友。欢迎收看禁闻论坛;几十年过去了，中苏之间的恩恩怨怨由于
苏联的解体划上了句号。但在最近从的俄罗斯解密档案中发现了一份毛泽东和斯大林秘
密签订的条约,引起世人的震惊。草庵居士,这份秘密文件的全称叫《中华人民共和国苏
维埃社会主义共和国联盟友好同盟特别协定》，是于1950年2月12日签订的，那它比《
中苏友好条约》的签订还早了两天?......2011-07-28
13:42:36http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a566291.html.-【禁闻论坛】中
国人，你为什么不生气？.html
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】【禁闻论坛】中国人，你为什么不生气？
中国人, 你为什么不生气?
安妮：您好！观众朋友。欢迎收看禁闻论坛;几十年过去了，中苏之间的恩恩怨怨由于
苏联的解体划上了句号。但在最近从的俄罗斯解密档案中发现了一份毛泽东和斯大林秘
密签订的条约,引起世人的震惊。草庵居士,这份秘密文件的全称叫《中华人民共和国苏
维埃社会主义共和国联盟友好同盟特别协定》，是于1950年2月12日签订的，那它比《
中苏友好条约》的签订还早了两天?......2011-07-28
13:42:36http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a566291.html.-【禁闻论坛】中
国人，你为什么不生气？.html
【禁闻】温州惨剧媒体起义 主播艺人露真性
【禁闻】温州惨剧媒体起义 主播艺人露真性
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】针对温州动车惨剧，中共中央宣传部连发通知，指令媒体
网站统一口径，引起国内一些媒体反弹抗议，包括中央电视台主持人白岩松在内的主播
和大牌明星，纷纷公开讲出真话、表露真情真性，而当局发言人和所谓�共和国脊梁�
的冷漠，遭到网民们一片质疑。
7月27号，《南方都市报》发表社论指出，这些天来，公众的质疑与汹汹怒火始终难以
止息，庞大体制的傲慢与骄狂依然，死难者人数不应成为欲盖弥彰的秘密。
浙江《钱江晚报》27号头版头条撤下全部稿件，只有广告，对中宣部的指令表达了抗
议。《天涯社区》的网友说，这是�史上最强的钱江晚报�。
李大同(中国青年报《冰点》周刊前主编)：【�中宣部它不能一手遮天，它没有这个能
力，因为这是个大事，全世界都在动，这么多网络评论都在动，它能管得住吗？管不住
的！当局也不是傻子，真正的舆论是什么它不是不知道。�
一向被称为中共喉舌的《央视》，也出现了反弹。央视女主播秦方在播报幸存女童伊伊
的新闻时，抑制不住的哽咽流泪，被网民称赞�真情流露�。
而大牌明星宋丹丹、赵薇、马伊璃、章子怡、刘嘉玲、曹颖和导演冯小刚等人，也为小
伊伊心疼流泪祈祷。徐静蕾、李小冉、何炅、吴京、王蓉、古巨基等明星在微博上号召
网友献血，为同胞祈祷。
24号晚，铁道部发言人王勇平辩解说，掩埋车头是为了便于抢险，还说�至于你信不
信，我反正信了�。王勇平遭到网民们狂轰，这句话也成了网络新讽刺流行语。
《央视》主播白岩松25号晚在《新闻1+1》节目中评论说：�一个多月之前我愿意相
信，但是现在我不敢信，不能信。�他指责中国高铁�可怕的冒进�。
而贵州电视台的《欣闻非常道》主持人王欣也在25号的节目中，对事故的真相进行质
疑。王欣斥责铁道部说：�在你道貌岸然、温文尔雅的面对镜头做出承诺的背后，有多
少可耻的、臭不可闻的、血淋淋的、赤裸裸的腐败。�
这个视频目前正在网上热传，网民们盛赞主持人。
与此同时，《央视》�朝闻天下�主持人赵普，在微博中披露了《央视》记者的采访艰
难，他写道：和现场近在咫尺却不能近身一步，和警察几乎肢体冲突。好多说不出的恶
心、失望，铁道部真的是破罐子破摔了，他们要干嘛？
江苏卫视《非诚勿扰》主持人孟非也在微博中写到：灾难面前，谎言是最大的魔鬼。切
尔诺贝利事故发生后，前苏联当局隐瞒说是火灾，民众开始对政府极度不信任和幻灭。
戈尔巴乔夫承认切尔诺贝利是压倒苏联的最后一根稻草。
一些大牌明星歌手也纷纷发表微博评论，表达愤怒。演员郭德纲作词悼念温州惨剧。演
员姚晨以一名老火车司机女儿的身份，指责专家有关司机疲劳驾驶的说法�简直混账之
极�。
演员欧阳奋强在微博中说：我们追求物质享受的时候，请不要遗忘了良心，敦请铁道部
公布遇难者名单，这些人简直没人性。
演员韩雪在微博中说：继�红十字会�后，铁道部是又一个失去公信力的机构部门。演
员伊能静直言：�我先是一个人，然后才是艺人，我无法对他人生命冷感，因为我们都
在其中！�
演员汤唯在微博上写道：一个虚弱的政体，卖把菜刀都需要实名；一个冰冷的政府，遇
难人数出来都是高度秘密。
演员葛优在微博上写道：死一个大一点的领导，就有无数的花圈，而死了几百个百
姓，只有不停的和谐。目前，葛优和汤唯的微博已遭到�和谐�。这是否是他俩人的官
方微博还有待考证。
而获得�共和国脊梁�之称的倪萍、李双江、刘兰芳等人，却没有一个对动车惨剧发表
看法，引起网民们一片质疑。中国�互动媒体集团�总裁洪晃在微博中，批评这些�共
和国脊梁�是选择奴役、愚昧、毫无原则的生命。
新唐人记者周玉林、李元翰、萧宇采访报导。
Crash Triggers Media Rebellion
Regarding the reporting on the recent high-speed rail tragedy,
the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) Propaganda Officereleased notices,
instructing all media to follow the official script.This caused protests
from some mainland media.
Many show host and stars, including CCTV host Bai Yansong,came out to speak
the truth.The indifference shown by the official CCP spokespersondraws
doubts from netizens.
On July 27, China's Southern Metropolitan Daily publishedan editorial
saying that in recent days,the doubts and anger of the public spread like
wildfires.
The pride and arrogance of the regime remain the same andthe actual number
of victims should not be kept a secret.
Zhejiang's Qianjiang Evening News took out headline newson July 27, and
replace them with advertisements,protesting against the instruction from
the Propaganda Office.
Netizens said on Tianya forum thatthis issue was the "best Qianjiang
Evening News in history".
Li Datong,ex-editor of China Youth Daily's magazine "Bingdia":The CCP
Propaganda Office cannot cover up the truth.It doesn't have the capability
to.This is big news. The entire world is watching.
Many websites are reporting about it.How can the CCP control that? It
cannot!The regime is not stupid.It knows what the real public opinion is.
Even the official CCP mouthpiece CCTV rebelled.
CCTV's female anchor Qin Fang started crying,while broadcasting the news of
an infant girl survivor Yiyi.She was praised by netizens as "showing her
true nature."
Stars like Song Dandan, Zhao Wei, Ma Yili, Zhang Ziyi,Carina Lau, Cao Ying
and director Feng Xiaogang,all prayed in tears for the girl Yiyi.Xu
Jinglei, Li Xiaoran, He Jiong, Wu Jing, Wang Rong andLeo Ku called out on
their micro-blogsfor people to donate blood and to pray for the victims.
On July 24, Ministry of Railways spokesman Wang Yongpingsaid that burying
the train cars was to facilitate rescue.He even said, "Whether you believe
or not,I believe that is the case."Wang was later heavily bombarded by
netizens,and his sentence has become a new online satirical phrase.
CCTV news anchor Bai Yansong said on the program"News 1+1" on July 25,"I
wanted to believe (Wang's statement) a month ago,but now I don't believe
and I cannot believe."He accused China's high-speed rail as a "terrifying
rush."
The Guizhou TV host Wang Xin also expressed doubtsregarding the official
statement.Wang Xin accused the Ministry of Railways,
"How much shameful, stinking and bloody naked corruptionis behind your
superficial calm and gentle appearance?"
This video is now widely circulating online,drawing praises of Wang Xin
from netizens.
Host of CCTV's show "Hear the World", Zhao Pu,revealed on his micro-blog
the difficulty for the reporters.He wrote, "They were right next to the
crash scene,but are not allowed to get closer.They were almost in physical
confrontation with police.So much disgust and disappointment.The Ministry
of Railways is so terrible.What do they want to do?"
Jiangsu TV's show host Meng Fei wrote on his micro-blog,"Faced with
tragedy, lies are the biggest devil.After Chernbobyl, the former Soviet
Union lied,causing people to extremely distrust the government.Even
Gorbachev acknowledged thatChernobyl was the last straw for the Soviet
Union."
Some big name stars also commented on their micro-blog,expressing their
outrage.Actor Guo Degang wrote lyrics mourning the victims.Actress Yao Chen
is the daughter of a train driver.She said that the lies about the train
driver's fatiguewere "just outrageous."
Actor Ouyang Fenqiang wrote on his micro-blog,
"While pursuing material comfort,please don't forget your conscience.I urge
the Ministry of Railways to announce the list of victims.These people
(Ministry of Railways) are simply inhumane."
Actress Han Xue wrote on her micro-blog,
"After the "Red Cross" incident,the Ministry of Railways is another
institution to lose credibility."Actress Annie Yi said,"I'm first a person,
then an artist.I cannot ignore other people's lives,because we are all part
of it."
Actress Tang Wei wrote on her micro-blog,
"A weak form of government,buying kitchen knives requires registration;an
icy-cold government,even the number of victims is top-secret."
Actor Ge You micro-blogged,
"If a higher-up official dies,there are countless flowers;when hundreds of
people die,there is constant harmonization."As the micro-blogs of Tang and
Ge were forced to shut down,it is uncertain whether they really blogged the
comments.
Jiao Guobiao (Former Professor at Peking University,School of Journalism
and Communication):Even media professionals like Bai Yansongand artists
like Ge You spoke out.This means the regime's actions are extreme atrocious.
Many other CCP-backed stars such as Ni Ping,Li Shuangjiang and Liu Lanfang,
all remained silent.They are questioned by doubtful netizens.The president
of China Interactive Media Group Hung Huangcriticized these so-called
"backbones of the Republic",as ignorant slaves that lack principles.
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Yuanhan and Xiao Yu 2011-07-29
07:56:35http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566295.html.-【禁闻】温州惨
剧媒体起义-主播艺人露真性.html
【新唐人2011年7月29日讯】针对温州动车惨剧，中共中央宣传部连发通知，指令媒体
网站统一口径，引起国内一些媒体反弹抗议，包括中央电视台主持人白岩松在内的主播
和大牌明星，纷纷公开讲出真话、表露真情真性，而当局发言人和所谓�共和国脊梁�
的冷漠，遭到网民们一片质疑。
7月27号，《南方都市报》发表社论指出，这些天来，公众的质疑与汹汹怒火始终难以
止息，庞大体制的傲慢与骄狂依然，死难者人数不应成为欲盖弥彰的秘密。
浙江《钱江晚报》27号头版头条撤下全部稿件，只有广告，对中宣部的指令表达了抗
议。《天涯社区》的网友说，这是�史上最强的钱江晚报�。
李大同(中国青年报《冰点》周刊前主编)：【�中宣部它不能一手遮天，它没有这个能
力，因为这是个大事，全世界都在动，这么多网络评论都在动，它能管得住吗？管不住
的！当局也不是傻子，真正的舆论是什么它不是不知道。�
一向被称为中共喉舌的《央视》，也出现了反弹。央视女主播秦方在播报幸存女童伊伊
的新闻时，抑制不住的哽咽流泪，被网民称赞�真情流露�。
而大牌明星宋丹丹、赵薇、马伊璃、章子怡、刘嘉玲、曹颖和导演冯小刚等人，也为小
伊伊心疼流泪祈祷。徐静蕾、李小冉、何炅、吴京、王蓉、古巨基等明星在微博上号召
网友献血，为同胞祈祷。
24号晚，铁道部发言人王勇平辩解说，掩埋车头是为了便于抢险，还说�至于你信不
信，我反正信了�。王勇平遭到网民们狂轰，这句话也成了网络新讽刺流行语。
《央视》主播白岩松25号晚在《新闻1+1》节目中评论说：�一个多月之前我愿意相
信，但是现在我不敢信，不能信。�他指责中国高铁�可怕的冒进�。
而贵州电视台的《欣闻非常道》主持人王欣也在25号的节目中，对事故的真相进行质
疑。王欣斥责铁道部说：�在你道貌岸然、温文尔雅的面对镜头做出承诺的背后，有多
少可耻的、臭不可闻的、血淋淋的、赤裸裸的腐败。�
这个视频目前正在网上热传，网民们盛赞主持人。
与此同时，《央视》�朝闻天下�主持人赵普，在微博中披露了《央视》记者的采访艰
难，他写道：和现场近在咫尺却不能近身一步，和警察几乎肢体冲突。好多说不出的恶
心、失望，铁道部真的是破罐子破摔了，他们要干嘛？
江苏卫视《非诚勿扰》主持人孟非也在微博中写到：灾难面前，谎言是最大的魔鬼。切
尔诺贝利事故发生后，前苏联当局隐瞒说是火灾，民众开始对政府极度不信任和幻灭。
戈尔巴乔夫承认切尔诺贝利是压倒苏联的最后一根稻草。
一些大牌明星歌手也纷纷发表微博评论，表达愤怒。演员郭德纲作词悼念温州惨剧。演
员姚晨以一名老火车司机女儿的身份，指责专家有关司机疲劳驾驶的说法�简直混账之
极�。
演员欧阳奋强在微博中说：我们追求物质享受的时候，请不要遗忘了良心，敦请铁道部
公布遇难者名单，这些人简直没人性。
演员韩雪在微博中说：继�红十字会�后，铁道部是又一个失去公信力的机构部门。演
员伊能静直言：�我先是一个人，然后才是艺人，我无法对他人生命冷感，因为我们都
在其中！�
演员汤唯在微博上写道：一个虚弱的政体，卖把菜刀都需要实名；一个冰冷的政府，遇
难人数出来都是高度秘密。
演员葛优在微博上写道：死一个大一点的领导，就有无数的花圈，而死了几百个百
姓，只有不停的和谐。目前，葛优和汤唯的微博已遭到�和谐�。这是否是他俩人的官
方微博还有待考证。
而获得�共和国脊梁�之称的倪萍、李双江、刘兰芳等人，却没有一个对动车惨剧发表
看法，引起网民们一片质疑。中国�互动媒体集团�总裁洪晃在微博中，批评这些�共
和国脊梁�是选择奴役、愚昧、毫无原则的生命。
新唐人记者周玉林、李元翰、萧宇采访报导。
Crash Triggers Media Rebellion
Regarding the reporting on the recent high-speed rail tragedy,
the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) Propaganda Officereleased notices,
instructing all media to follow the official script.This caused protests
from some mainland media.
Many show host and stars, including CCTV host Bai Yansong,came out to speak
the truth.The indifference shown by the official CCP spokespersondraws
doubts from netizens.
On July 27, China's Southern Metropolitan Daily publishedan editorial
saying that in recent days,the doubts and anger of the public spread like
wildfires.
The pride and arrogance of the regime remain the same andthe actual number
of victims should not be kept a secret.
Zhejiang's Qianjiang Evening News took out headline newson July 27, and
replace them with advertisements,protesting against the instruction from
the Propaganda Office.
Netizens said on Tianya forum thatthis issue was the "best Qianjiang
Evening News in history".
Li Datong,ex-editor of China Youth Daily's magazine "Bingdia":The CCP
Propaganda Office cannot cover up the truth.It doesn't have the capability
to.This is big news. The entire world is watching.
Many websites are reporting about it.How can the CCP control that? It
cannot!The regime is not stupid.It knows what the real public opinion is.
Even the official CCP mouthpiece CCTV rebelled.
CCTV's female anchor Qin Fang started crying,while broadcasting the news of
an infant girl survivor Yiyi.She was praised by netizens as "showing her
true nature."
Stars like Song Dandan, Zhao Wei, Ma Yili, Zhang Ziyi,Carina Lau, Cao Ying
and director Feng Xiaogang,all prayed in tears for the girl Yiyi.Xu
Jinglei, Li Xiaoran, He Jiong, Wu Jing, Wang Rong andLeo Ku called out on
their micro-blogsfor people to donate blood and to pray for the victims.
On July 24, Ministry of Railways spokesman Wang Yongpingsaid that burying
the train cars was to facilitate rescue.He even said, "Whether you believe
or not,I believe that is the case."Wang was later heavily bombarded by
netizens,and his sentence has become a new online satirical phrase.
CCTV news anchor Bai Yansong said on the program"News 1+1" on July 25,"I
wanted to believe (Wang's statement) a month ago,but now I don't believe
and I cannot believe."He accused China's high-speed rail as a "terrifying
rush."
The Guizhou TV host Wang Xin also expressed doubtsregarding the official
statement.Wang Xin accused the Ministry of Railways,
"How much shameful, stinking and bloody naked corruptionis behind your
superficial calm and gentle appearance?"
This video is now widely circulating online,drawing praises of Wang Xin
from netizens.
Host of CCTV's show "Hear the World", Zhao Pu,revealed on his micro-blog
the difficulty for the reporters.He wrote, "They were right next to the
crash scene,but are not allowed to get closer.They were almost in physical
confrontation with police.So much disgust and disappointment.The Ministry
of Railways is so terrible.What do they want to do?"
Jiangsu TV's show host Meng Fei wrote on his micro-blog,"Faced with
tragedy, lies are the biggest devil.After Chernbobyl, the former Soviet
Union lied,causing people to extremely distrust the government.Even
Gorbachev acknowledged thatChernobyl was the last straw for the Soviet
Union."
Some big name stars also commented on their micro-blog,expressing their
outrage.Actor Guo Degang wrote lyrics mourning the victims.Actress Yao Chen
is the daughter of a train driver.She said that the lies about the train
driver's fatiguewere "just outrageous."
Actor Ouyang Fenqiang wrote on his micro-blog,
"While pursuing material comfort,please don't forget your conscience.I urge
the Ministry of Railways to announce the list of victims.These people
(Ministry of Railways) are simply inhumane."
Actress Han Xue wrote on her micro-blog,
"After the "Red Cross" incident,the Ministry of Railways is another
institution to lose credibility."Actress Annie Yi said,"I'm first a person,
then an artist.I cannot ignore other people's lives,because we are all part
of it."
Actress Tang Wei wrote on her micro-blog,
"A weak form of government,buying kitchen knives requires registration;an
icy-cold government,even the number of victims is top-secret."
Actor Ge You micro-blogged,
"If a higher-up official dies,there are countless flowers;when hundreds of
people die,there is constant harmonization."As the micro-blogs of Tang and
Ge were forced to shut down,it is uncertain whether they really blogged the
comments.
Jiao Guobiao (Former Professor at Peking University,School of Journalism
and Communication):Even media professionals like Bai Yansongand artists
like Ge You spoke out.This means the regime's actions are extreme atrocious.
Many other CCP-backed stars such as Ni Ping,Li Shuangjiang and Liu Lanfang,
all remained silent.They are questioned by doubtful netizens.The president
of China Interactive Media Group Hung Huangcriticized these so-called
"backbones of the Republic",as ignorant slaves that lack principles.
NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Yuanhan and Xiao Yu 2011-07-29
07:56:35http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/29/a566295.html.-【禁闻】温州惨
剧媒体起义-主播艺人露真性.html
2011年7月27日星期三
【禁闻】高铁事故主因 中宣部令不报导
【禁闻】高铁事故主因 中宣部令不报导
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】中国的高铁技术是在日本、法国和德国的技术上发展起来
的，其中有多少技术是中国本身掌握的呢？一直以来，中国高铁系统的安全问题就备受
关注，�温州动车追尾事故�更突显了这个隐忧，中共当局是否为了争取高铁发展的世
界第一荣誉，不断在速度上创记录，而忽略了安全标准？成为外界追求事故主因的焦
点。中宣部事后并下令限制报导，更引发民意的挞伐。
据路透社报导，在动车追尾事故发生后第二天，中宣部下达指示，要求媒体以�大灾面
前有大爱�为主题报导此事。并要求媒体�不质疑，不展开，不联想�。不要调查事故
原因。铁道部发言人王勇平说，这起事故是由于雷击造成设备故障导致的。舆论批评当
局把老百姓当傻子。
坐在被追尾动车最后一节车厢的乘客金显眼以及九岁儿子不幸身亡。他的哥哥金先生要
求政府给出公正处理。
金先生：� 第一个是撞车的总体情况，具体情况还没有搞清楚。为什么会发生这么大
的事故？第二个问题就是赔偿问题没有给我们解决好。我昨天电视上好像看到了，一个
人只有赔17万左右。那根本是不可能的事情嘛。�
北京学者彭定鼎表示，事故的根本原因是铁道部极其混乱的管理，也是当局盲目追求世
界第一，追求政绩工程和虚荣心导致的结果。雷击绝对无法作为事故发生的理由。
彭定鼎：�现在信息技术这么发达的年代，一条线上如果有一辆车出故障的话，那么这
条线上难道不应该其他的车立即都得到信号，停止运行吗？是不是雷电损坏了发动
机，就应该出这样的事情呢？难道在高铁投入运行的时候，他没有这种预案吗？�
北京交通大学运输经济管理学院副教授李红昌表示，发生追尾事故令人费解，前方列车
停驶，为何不通知调度室以及后方车辆？即使用最原始的打电话方式也能实现。
李红昌：�很难以理解。在于说，他本来是可以通过这种方式来解决的。但是为什么就
没有解决得好？我们表示很奇怪。停车的人打个电话给调度所。调度所应该通知给后
车。除非是管理责任。�
大陆媒体《新京报》引述一位从业20多年的列车司机介绍，所有列车，即使是全部系统
失灵，只要在轨道上，调度中心就会拥有列车的运行信息。而列车行车全听调度指挥。
如果两车的间距低于安全值时，调度计算机也会通过�自动防护系统�发出警告。这位
司机认为，如果不是人为破坏或者调度中心系统死机，那么就是调度失误或不够及时造
成事故。
当局在事故发生八小时以后就停止搜救，声称用仪器探测没有发现生命迹象。而后对车
厢和车头进行拆卸，并就地挖坑，用泥土掩埋。依照常识，发生追尾的D301次列车的火
车头，应是调查事故原因的重要物证。
彭定鼎：�3.15这种把车头掩埋起来，夜里深夜拖走。铁道部就像是贼。政府都像是
贼。�北京官方《经济观察网》的评论也质疑，铁道部清理现场的做法，是否构成了�
破坏事故现场�。
北京大学法学院教授贺卫方就温州铁路事故发出呼吁，要求全国人大根据宪法第71条规
定，组成�特别调查委员会�就此调查。贺卫方说，特别调查是最高权力机关责无旁贷
的义务，宪法规定�特别调查委员会�制度已经历时30年，但全国人大从未启动。
彭定鼎认为，在中共体制下寻求真相没有希望。北京律师谢燕益则表示，应该用多元化
的渠道寻求真相，包括媒体和公民的角度。
截至25号，中共当局公布的死亡人数为40人。但《上海东方卫视》报导，现场有消息
说：死亡数字为63人。而据中国社交网络《人人网》引述现场志愿者�栾天�的日
志：死亡人数初步估计已经超过179人。
新唐人记者秦雪、柏妮采访报导。
CCP Covers up Cause of Crash
China's high-speed railway technologies were developedfrom Japanese, French
and German technologies.How many independent technologies does China have?
Safety problems have long been a public concern.It is demonstrated by the
Wenzhou train accident.In pursuit of world honors, Chinese authorities have
constantlypushed for record speeds, even at the cost of safety.The
authorities have become the focus of attentionafter the public questioned
the cause of the accident.The Central Department of Propaganda issued
restrictionsover the report of the crash.This incurred more public
criticism.
According to Reuters, on the day following the accident,
Central Department of Propaganda ordered the media to focusonly on the
theme of "great love in front of the great disaster."They required the
media "not to question, not to reflect,not to speculate"- not even to
investigate the cause.Wang Yongping, a spokesman for the Ministry of
Railways said
that lightening caused equipment failure,which in turn caused the
accident.Public criticism says that the authoritiesare making a mockery of
the people.
Jin Xianyan and his 9-year-old son perished in the crash.
His brother requested the governmentto offer compensation to the
deceased.Mr. Jin: The cause of the accident is not clarified.Why would such
a serious accident happen at the first place?The second issue is about
compensation.I saw on television yesterday that each deathis compensated
with only RMB 170,000.That is simply great injustice!"
Beijing- based scholar Peng Dingding said that the ultimatecause was the
chaotic administration of Ministry of Railways.It is also a result of
authorities' blind pursuit of world records,vanity and political
performance.Lightening can never be the true reason for the accident.
Peng Dingding: It is a time of well-developed info technology.
If a train has equipment failure,how can the other trains on the railway
not obtain the info?Is it a legitimate excuse that lightening damaged the
engine?
When the high speed train was put into operation,didn't they take into
consideration such dangers?"
Li Hongchang, professor at Beijing's Transportation University,expressed
his confusion about the rear-end accident.He wondered why the control
office did not notifythe other vehicles as soon as the first one had
stopped.He stated that even telephone calls would fulfill that task.
Li Hongchang: It is very difficult to understand.
Why wasn't the accident preventedeven though there were measures of
prevention in place?We all feel strange about it.
Once the control office learns of the stoppage,they should notify the
vehicles behind.Otherwise, it would be malfeasance.
Beijing News quoted a train driver with 20 years of experience
saying that the control office should have all trains' info,as long as they
stay on track, even with complete system failure.All trains follow the
instructions of the control office.
If the distance between two trains reaches an alert level,
the scheduling computer will send out a warningthrough the automatic
protection system.The driver said, if it's not deliberate sabotage or
control systemfailure, it must have been caused by mis-scheduling.
The authorities stopped rescue, eight hours after the accident,claiming
that there were no more signs of life.They then demolished the locomotive
of D301,which is the train that rear-ended the first one, and buried it.It
is common sense that the locomotive isimportant evidence for an
investigation.
Peng: Burying the locomotive and moving it away at night �the Ministry of
Railways is acting like a thief,just like the entire government.
Comments from Beijing authorities' official websiteEconomic Observer Online
questioned the Ministry of Railways,saying that their clearance of the
crash siteconstitutes the crime of "destruction of an accident site."
Law School professor He Weifang at Beijing Universitycalled for a special
committee of investigation for the accident.This would be in accordance
with article 71 of the constitution.
He said forming a special commission is an obligationof the highest
authorities.The special commission institution has been establishedfor 30
years without even one commission being set up.
Peng Dingding said that there is no mechanism to obtainthe truth from the
communist regime.Beijing lawyer Xie Yanyi called for more channels of
info,including media and individual citizens.
The official death toll released on July 25 was 40.
However, according to Shanghai Oriental TV,news from the accident site
reported 63 deaths.Netizen Letian released on renren.com, China's
Facebook,that the preliminary figure of deaths had exceeded 179.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Bo Ni 2011-07-28
11:04:25http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565836.html.-【禁闻】高铁事
故主因-中宣部令不报导.html
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】中国的高铁技术是在日本、法国和德国的技术上发展起来
的，其中有多少技术是中国本身掌握的呢？一直以来，中国高铁系统的安全问题就备受
关注，�温州动车追尾事故�更突显了这个隐忧，中共当局是否为了争取高铁发展的世
界第一荣誉，不断在速度上创记录，而忽略了安全标准？成为外界追求事故主因的焦
点。中宣部事后并下令限制报导，更引发民意的挞伐。
据路透社报导，在动车追尾事故发生后第二天，中宣部下达指示，要求媒体以�大灾面
前有大爱�为主题报导此事。并要求媒体�不质疑，不展开，不联想�。不要调查事故
原因。铁道部发言人王勇平说，这起事故是由于雷击造成设备故障导致的。舆论批评当
局把老百姓当傻子。
坐在被追尾动车最后一节车厢的乘客金显眼以及九岁儿子不幸身亡。他的哥哥金先生要
求政府给出公正处理。
金先生：� 第一个是撞车的总体情况，具体情况还没有搞清楚。为什么会发生这么大
的事故？第二个问题就是赔偿问题没有给我们解决好。我昨天电视上好像看到了，一个
人只有赔17万左右。那根本是不可能的事情嘛。�
北京学者彭定鼎表示，事故的根本原因是铁道部极其混乱的管理，也是当局盲目追求世
界第一，追求政绩工程和虚荣心导致的结果。雷击绝对无法作为事故发生的理由。
彭定鼎：�现在信息技术这么发达的年代，一条线上如果有一辆车出故障的话，那么这
条线上难道不应该其他的车立即都得到信号，停止运行吗？是不是雷电损坏了发动
机，就应该出这样的事情呢？难道在高铁投入运行的时候，他没有这种预案吗？�
北京交通大学运输经济管理学院副教授李红昌表示，发生追尾事故令人费解，前方列车
停驶，为何不通知调度室以及后方车辆？即使用最原始的打电话方式也能实现。
李红昌：�很难以理解。在于说，他本来是可以通过这种方式来解决的。但是为什么就
没有解决得好？我们表示很奇怪。停车的人打个电话给调度所。调度所应该通知给后
车。除非是管理责任。�
大陆媒体《新京报》引述一位从业20多年的列车司机介绍，所有列车，即使是全部系统
失灵，只要在轨道上，调度中心就会拥有列车的运行信息。而列车行车全听调度指挥。
如果两车的间距低于安全值时，调度计算机也会通过�自动防护系统�发出警告。这位
司机认为，如果不是人为破坏或者调度中心系统死机，那么就是调度失误或不够及时造
成事故。
当局在事故发生八小时以后就停止搜救，声称用仪器探测没有发现生命迹象。而后对车
厢和车头进行拆卸，并就地挖坑，用泥土掩埋。依照常识，发生追尾的D301次列车的火
车头，应是调查事故原因的重要物证。
彭定鼎：�3.15这种把车头掩埋起来，夜里深夜拖走。铁道部就像是贼。政府都像是
贼。�北京官方《经济观察网》的评论也质疑，铁道部清理现场的做法，是否构成了�
破坏事故现场�。
北京大学法学院教授贺卫方就温州铁路事故发出呼吁，要求全国人大根据宪法第71条规
定，组成�特别调查委员会�就此调查。贺卫方说，特别调查是最高权力机关责无旁贷
的义务，宪法规定�特别调查委员会�制度已经历时30年，但全国人大从未启动。
彭定鼎认为，在中共体制下寻求真相没有希望。北京律师谢燕益则表示，应该用多元化
的渠道寻求真相，包括媒体和公民的角度。
截至25号，中共当局公布的死亡人数为40人。但《上海东方卫视》报导，现场有消息
说：死亡数字为63人。而据中国社交网络《人人网》引述现场志愿者�栾天�的日
志：死亡人数初步估计已经超过179人。
新唐人记者秦雪、柏妮采访报导。
CCP Covers up Cause of Crash
China's high-speed railway technologies were developedfrom Japanese, French
and German technologies.How many independent technologies does China have?
Safety problems have long been a public concern.It is demonstrated by the
Wenzhou train accident.In pursuit of world honors, Chinese authorities have
constantlypushed for record speeds, even at the cost of safety.The
authorities have become the focus of attentionafter the public questioned
the cause of the accident.The Central Department of Propaganda issued
restrictionsover the report of the crash.This incurred more public
criticism.
According to Reuters, on the day following the accident,
Central Department of Propaganda ordered the media to focusonly on the
theme of "great love in front of the great disaster."They required the
media "not to question, not to reflect,not to speculate"- not even to
investigate the cause.Wang Yongping, a spokesman for the Ministry of
Railways said
that lightening caused equipment failure,which in turn caused the
accident.Public criticism says that the authoritiesare making a mockery of
the people.
Jin Xianyan and his 9-year-old son perished in the crash.
His brother requested the governmentto offer compensation to the
deceased.Mr. Jin: The cause of the accident is not clarified.Why would such
a serious accident happen at the first place?The second issue is about
compensation.I saw on television yesterday that each deathis compensated
with only RMB 170,000.That is simply great injustice!"
Beijing- based scholar Peng Dingding said that the ultimatecause was the
chaotic administration of Ministry of Railways.It is also a result of
authorities' blind pursuit of world records,vanity and political
performance.Lightening can never be the true reason for the accident.
Peng Dingding: It is a time of well-developed info technology.
If a train has equipment failure,how can the other trains on the railway
not obtain the info?Is it a legitimate excuse that lightening damaged the
engine?
When the high speed train was put into operation,didn't they take into
consideration such dangers?"
Li Hongchang, professor at Beijing's Transportation University,expressed
his confusion about the rear-end accident.He wondered why the control
office did not notifythe other vehicles as soon as the first one had
stopped.He stated that even telephone calls would fulfill that task.
Li Hongchang: It is very difficult to understand.
Why wasn't the accident preventedeven though there were measures of
prevention in place?We all feel strange about it.
Once the control office learns of the stoppage,they should notify the
vehicles behind.Otherwise, it would be malfeasance.
Beijing News quoted a train driver with 20 years of experience
saying that the control office should have all trains' info,as long as they
stay on track, even with complete system failure.All trains follow the
instructions of the control office.
If the distance between two trains reaches an alert level,
the scheduling computer will send out a warningthrough the automatic
protection system.The driver said, if it's not deliberate sabotage or
control systemfailure, it must have been caused by mis-scheduling.
The authorities stopped rescue, eight hours after the accident,claiming
that there were no more signs of life.They then demolished the locomotive
of D301,which is the train that rear-ended the first one, and buried it.It
is common sense that the locomotive isimportant evidence for an
investigation.
Peng: Burying the locomotive and moving it away at night �the Ministry of
Railways is acting like a thief,just like the entire government.
Comments from Beijing authorities' official websiteEconomic Observer Online
questioned the Ministry of Railways,saying that their clearance of the
crash siteconstitutes the crime of "destruction of an accident site."
Law School professor He Weifang at Beijing Universitycalled for a special
committee of investigation for the accident.This would be in accordance
with article 71 of the constitution.
He said forming a special commission is an obligationof the highest
authorities.The special commission institution has been establishedfor 30
years without even one commission being set up.
Peng Dingding said that there is no mechanism to obtainthe truth from the
communist regime.Beijing lawyer Xie Yanyi called for more channels of
info,including media and individual citizens.
The official death toll released on July 25 was 40.
However, according to Shanghai Oriental TV,news from the accident site
reported 63 deaths.Netizen Letian released on renren.com, China's
Facebook,that the preliminary figure of deaths had exceeded 179.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Bo Ni 2011-07-28
11:04:25http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565836.html.-【禁闻】高铁事
故主因-中宣部令不报导.html
【禁言博客】贪官经验交流会上的讲话
【禁言博客】贪官经验交流会上的讲话
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】【禁言博客】贪官经验交流会上的讲话
从"五不搞"看从前的"什么都能搞"
博客中国，有一篇署名东野长峥的文章，题目叫：从"五不搞"，看从前的"什么都能搞
"。文章列举了中共在建政前后，有关民主制度的不同言论。今年7月1号，中共《新华
社》发表文章说，在当今中国，如果照搬西方的多党竞争议会制度，会重演辛亥革命后
政党林立，文化大革命中派别丛生的混乱动荡史。今年初，中共人大委员长吴邦国也声
称：不搞包括多党轮流执政在内的"五不搞"。然而，中共建政前的1944年6月，毛泽东
曾对中外记者说，"只有结束一党治国，才有民主可言。1944年3月，周恩来也曾在延安
演讲中说，目前全国人民最迫切需要的自由，是人身居住的自由，是集会结社的自
由，是言论出版的自由。1941年6月，原中共机关报《新华日报》说，统制思想，箝制
言论，这是中国过去专制时代的愚民政策，是法西斯主义的办法。1946年《新华日报》
曾发表《一党独裁，遍地是灾》的社论。同年11月17号，《新华日报》说，中国共产党
一向是忠实于它对人民的诺言的，一向是言行一致的，我们决不空谈保障人权。1939年
2月25号，《新华日报》说，要彻底地、充分地、有效地实行普选制，使人民能在实际
上，享有�普通�、�平等�的选举权、被选举权。对这种翻手云、覆手雨的流氓做
法。有网友发帖说：当年中共靠"什么都可以搞"，欺骗了无数向往民主自由的仁人志
士，抛头颅、洒热血的帮他们夺取了政权。今天，又靠着"五不搞"，维护他们自己"什
么都可以搞"的特权，中共滥用公权，一党独裁、权力世袭。任意搜刮民脂民膏，用纳
税人的钱，为自己涂脂抹粉并且挥霍无度。甚至以维稳的藉口，随意杀人。
贪官经验交流会上的讲话
"年年反腐败，腐败年年"。是当今中国大陆的现状。有网友恶搞出一个"在贪官经验交
流会上的讲话"我给大家念念：各位贪友，当前，形势一派大好。我们的队伍不断壮
大，贪腐记录不断被刷新，达到了一个新的历史阶段。政策也对我们非常有利，"让一
部分人先富起来！"就是指的咱们这些人。组织上也在千方百计保护我们。在司法层面
开始了柔性调整，万一暴露也会是从轻处理、或尽量开脱，数千万、上亿元的大贪，也
基本上都保住了性命。最终必将形成"一个不杀、大部分不抓"的可喜结局。不过还是要
居安思危，下面我就"要贪更须防露"讲几点注意事项：一、着装须得体大方，切忌上、
下、里、外一身名牌。男忌：名表香烟价值不菲。女忌：钻戒项链过于昂贵。二、贪污
受贿所得存折、现金，妥善放置。千万别放卫生间、储藏室等地，更不能夹在书报或茶
叶盒里。发生过有卫生间漏水"泡"出的，小偷"偷"出的事例。说明我们财产存放的不科
学。三、要处理好家庭成员间的关系。尤其要处理好妻、妾之间的关系。为此，男贪官
对妻妾须做到物质上一视同仁，精神上要平分"夜色"。切忌厚此薄彼。必要时可以采用
MBA管理艺术，统领情妇团队。如有背叛者，坚决镇压不手软！四、正确处理房产、店
铺等不动产，可以用妻儿、亲属名义置业或使用，万不可长久闲置，让人生疑举报。
五、其他，诸如开车撞出、逆子乱出，拔萝卜带出的贪官落马意外事件，在此不一一列
举。总之，提醒大家要密切注意个人言行，提防细节暴露问题。严加防守举报上访事件
发生，并且将自己及家庭打理清爽。最后祝大家：胆更大、心更黑、手更长、嘴更馋、
根更硬！谢谢大家！ 2011-07-27
22:31:00http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/27/a565811.html.-【禁言博客】贪
官经验交流会上的讲话.html
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】【禁言博客】贪官经验交流会上的讲话
从"五不搞"看从前的"什么都能搞"
博客中国，有一篇署名东野长峥的文章，题目叫：从"五不搞"，看从前的"什么都能搞
"。文章列举了中共在建政前后，有关民主制度的不同言论。今年7月1号，中共《新华
社》发表文章说，在当今中国，如果照搬西方的多党竞争议会制度，会重演辛亥革命后
政党林立，文化大革命中派别丛生的混乱动荡史。今年初，中共人大委员长吴邦国也声
称：不搞包括多党轮流执政在内的"五不搞"。然而，中共建政前的1944年6月，毛泽东
曾对中外记者说，"只有结束一党治国，才有民主可言。1944年3月，周恩来也曾在延安
演讲中说，目前全国人民最迫切需要的自由，是人身居住的自由，是集会结社的自
由，是言论出版的自由。1941年6月，原中共机关报《新华日报》说，统制思想，箝制
言论，这是中国过去专制时代的愚民政策，是法西斯主义的办法。1946年《新华日报》
曾发表《一党独裁，遍地是灾》的社论。同年11月17号，《新华日报》说，中国共产党
一向是忠实于它对人民的诺言的，一向是言行一致的，我们决不空谈保障人权。1939年
2月25号，《新华日报》说，要彻底地、充分地、有效地实行普选制，使人民能在实际
上，享有�普通�、�平等�的选举权、被选举权。对这种翻手云、覆手雨的流氓做
法。有网友发帖说：当年中共靠"什么都可以搞"，欺骗了无数向往民主自由的仁人志
士，抛头颅、洒热血的帮他们夺取了政权。今天，又靠着"五不搞"，维护他们自己"什
么都可以搞"的特权，中共滥用公权，一党独裁、权力世袭。任意搜刮民脂民膏，用纳
税人的钱，为自己涂脂抹粉并且挥霍无度。甚至以维稳的藉口，随意杀人。
贪官经验交流会上的讲话
"年年反腐败，腐败年年"。是当今中国大陆的现状。有网友恶搞出一个"在贪官经验交
流会上的讲话"我给大家念念：各位贪友，当前，形势一派大好。我们的队伍不断壮
大，贪腐记录不断被刷新，达到了一个新的历史阶段。政策也对我们非常有利，"让一
部分人先富起来！"就是指的咱们这些人。组织上也在千方百计保护我们。在司法层面
开始了柔性调整，万一暴露也会是从轻处理、或尽量开脱，数千万、上亿元的大贪，也
基本上都保住了性命。最终必将形成"一个不杀、大部分不抓"的可喜结局。不过还是要
居安思危，下面我就"要贪更须防露"讲几点注意事项：一、着装须得体大方，切忌上、
下、里、外一身名牌。男忌：名表香烟价值不菲。女忌：钻戒项链过于昂贵。二、贪污
受贿所得存折、现金，妥善放置。千万别放卫生间、储藏室等地，更不能夹在书报或茶
叶盒里。发生过有卫生间漏水"泡"出的，小偷"偷"出的事例。说明我们财产存放的不科
学。三、要处理好家庭成员间的关系。尤其要处理好妻、妾之间的关系。为此，男贪官
对妻妾须做到物质上一视同仁，精神上要平分"夜色"。切忌厚此薄彼。必要时可以采用
MBA管理艺术，统领情妇团队。如有背叛者，坚决镇压不手软！四、正确处理房产、店
铺等不动产，可以用妻儿、亲属名义置业或使用，万不可长久闲置，让人生疑举报。
五、其他，诸如开车撞出、逆子乱出，拔萝卜带出的贪官落马意外事件，在此不一一列
举。总之，提醒大家要密切注意个人言行，提防细节暴露问题。严加防守举报上访事件
发生，并且将自己及家庭打理清爽。最后祝大家：胆更大、心更黑、手更长、嘴更馋、
根更硬！谢谢大家！ 2011-07-27
22:31:00http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/27/a565811.html.-【禁言博客】贪
官经验交流会上的讲话.html
【禁闻】赖昌星案是否涉及中南海 民众热议
【禁闻】赖昌星案是否涉及中南海 民众热议
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】12年前创下了中国最大经济案件�远华案�的主角赖昌
星，虽然被引渡回国，但因为这个案件涉案人数多达600多人，在十八大召开前这个敏
感时机，赖昌星案背后是否牵涉中共内部权斗的问题？中共会如何处理赖昌星案，特别
引起舆论的关注。
�厦门远华案�主角赖昌星逃亡12年后，23号被加拿大政府遣返回国。�远华案�5年
走私货物总值530亿元，偷逃税额300亿元，涉案600多人，近300人被追究刑事责
任，8人被处死刑。依法赖昌星应该判十几个死刑的，然而中共高层却允诺不判他死
刑，目地是什么？我们来听听几位学者专家的说法：
加拿大华裔作家盛雪在访问赖昌星所写的《远华案黑幕》一书中披露，赖昌星承认与中
共高干的83个秘书有来往等若干机密。
中国知名作家铁流认为，胡锦涛如果真的为国家民族着想，那他就应该把这个作为贪腐
的一个决口打开，这些贪官就会全部落马，但是不是会这样走，大家都会拭目以待。
铁流：�你想赖昌星是个农民吧，为什么这么倡狂，为什么这么厉害，没有权利可能
吗？像我在北京待了六年，这权力非常厉害的，前面一个权利，后面一个支持你，那你
什么事都可以做得出来，这真的是一个假清流，不可推托的责任。�
河北异议作家朱欣欣指出，现在中共这种权贵集团已经形成一种集体性腐败了，他希望
赖昌星能够把他知道的一些内幕说出来。但是，他是不是有机会可以说出来就不好说
了。
朱欣欣：�赖昌星掌握这么多秘密，一旦对他们中共内部不利的话，恐怕他们也不是没
有灭口这种可能，找个理由，有病啦，先散布散布这个，这个让他消失找很多藉口这容
易的。�
�郭泉案�辩护律师郭莲辉表示，中共承诺不把赖昌星判死刑，目地是什么？确实发人
深省，人们就不得不考虑到，这个背后是否会牵涉到内部权斗的问题。
郭莲辉：�既然我们国家的领导人口口声声的说，要把中国建成一个法治社会，要依法
办事依法治国，那么这种承诺，中国（共）政府根本是与依法治国、法治社会是相背背
道而驰的。�
朱欣欣提到，一个中国问题专家曾经说过，在一个没有法治的共产社会，对他任何的预
设都是很难的，他就是一个铁幕，都是暗箱操作，最终甚至连他的统治者都无法掌握他
自己的未来。
新唐人记者白梅、李庭、黎安安采访报导。=====
Lai's Incriminating Secrets
Lai Changxing, main culprit of the 12-year-long Yuan Hua Case,China's
largest economic case, has been extradited back.The case involves as many
as 600 people,
and is at a sensitive time now in the eve ofChinese Communist Party's (CCP)
18th National Congress in 2012.Does Lai's Case involve the CCP's internal
power struggle?How the CCP handles the case has become a public concern.
Lai Changxing fled 12 years ago to Canadaand was extradited back to China
on July 23, 2011.The Yuan Hua Case involves the smuggling of goodsworth RMB
53 billion over a 5-year period,tax evasion of RMB 30 billion,and
implication of more than 600 people.Nearly 300 people were prosecuted for
criminal liability,and eight have been sentenced to death.According to the
law,Lai should have received the death penalty.However, CCP leadership has
promisednot to sentence him to death.
Chinese-Canadian writer Shen Xue wrote a book titled"Unveiling the Yuan Hua
Case" after interviewing Lai.The book reveals that Lai admitted that he had
contactswith 83 secretaries of high-ranking CCP cadresand has a significant
amount of inside information.
Tie Liu, a well-known writer in China, commented thatif Hu Jintao is truly
concerned with the wellbeing of the nation,then he should target the
corrupted CCP cadres.Everyone is waiting to see how he will act.
Tie Liu: Lai Changxing was a farmer. Why is he so bold?Without political
power, can he be so outrageous?I spent six years in Beijing and know
thatwith the support of the powerful, you may do whatever you like.A clean
government? This can be only a joke.They cannot run away from their
responsibilities.
Hebei-based dissident writer Zhu Xinxin believes thatnow the CCP's elite
group has formed a collective corruption.He hopes that Lai will reveal some
incriminating evidences.Whether Lai will have that chance or not is another
matter.
Zhu Xinxin: Lai has so much inside information.
Once his secrets are against China's internal interests,I am afraid it is
not impossible for them to silence him.They can find an excuse and claim
that he's sick.
First, they'll spread the word.It would just be so easy to find an excuse
for his disappearance.
Attorney Guo Lianhui said that the CCP promisednot to sentence Lai to
death.The underlying power struggle iscentered on internal problems.
Guo Lianhui: Our nation's leaders repeatedly say that
China should build a society with a rule of law,and to act according to the
rule of law.But their commitment only shows thatthe communist regime is
against the rule of law.
Zhu Xinxin mentioned that a China expert once said that
in a communist society where there is no rule of law,any precaution is
useless.It is an iron curtain; everything is in a black-box,and ultimately
even its ruler cannot control his own fate.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Li Ting and Li Anan. 2011-07-28
11:26:12http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565837.html.-【禁闻】赖昌星
案是否涉及中南海-民众热议.html
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】12年前创下了中国最大经济案件�远华案�的主角赖昌
星，虽然被引渡回国，但因为这个案件涉案人数多达600多人，在十八大召开前这个敏
感时机，赖昌星案背后是否牵涉中共内部权斗的问题？中共会如何处理赖昌星案，特别
引起舆论的关注。
�厦门远华案�主角赖昌星逃亡12年后，23号被加拿大政府遣返回国。�远华案�5年
走私货物总值530亿元，偷逃税额300亿元，涉案600多人，近300人被追究刑事责
任，8人被处死刑。依法赖昌星应该判十几个死刑的，然而中共高层却允诺不判他死
刑，目地是什么？我们来听听几位学者专家的说法：
加拿大华裔作家盛雪在访问赖昌星所写的《远华案黑幕》一书中披露，赖昌星承认与中
共高干的83个秘书有来往等若干机密。
中国知名作家铁流认为，胡锦涛如果真的为国家民族着想，那他就应该把这个作为贪腐
的一个决口打开，这些贪官就会全部落马，但是不是会这样走，大家都会拭目以待。
铁流：�你想赖昌星是个农民吧，为什么这么倡狂，为什么这么厉害，没有权利可能
吗？像我在北京待了六年，这权力非常厉害的，前面一个权利，后面一个支持你，那你
什么事都可以做得出来，这真的是一个假清流，不可推托的责任。�
河北异议作家朱欣欣指出，现在中共这种权贵集团已经形成一种集体性腐败了，他希望
赖昌星能够把他知道的一些内幕说出来。但是，他是不是有机会可以说出来就不好说
了。
朱欣欣：�赖昌星掌握这么多秘密，一旦对他们中共内部不利的话，恐怕他们也不是没
有灭口这种可能，找个理由，有病啦，先散布散布这个，这个让他消失找很多藉口这容
易的。�
�郭泉案�辩护律师郭莲辉表示，中共承诺不把赖昌星判死刑，目地是什么？确实发人
深省，人们就不得不考虑到，这个背后是否会牵涉到内部权斗的问题。
郭莲辉：�既然我们国家的领导人口口声声的说，要把中国建成一个法治社会，要依法
办事依法治国，那么这种承诺，中国（共）政府根本是与依法治国、法治社会是相背背
道而驰的。�
朱欣欣提到，一个中国问题专家曾经说过，在一个没有法治的共产社会，对他任何的预
设都是很难的，他就是一个铁幕，都是暗箱操作，最终甚至连他的统治者都无法掌握他
自己的未来。
新唐人记者白梅、李庭、黎安安采访报导。=====
Lai's Incriminating Secrets
Lai Changxing, main culprit of the 12-year-long Yuan Hua Case,China's
largest economic case, has been extradited back.The case involves as many
as 600 people,
and is at a sensitive time now in the eve ofChinese Communist Party's (CCP)
18th National Congress in 2012.Does Lai's Case involve the CCP's internal
power struggle?How the CCP handles the case has become a public concern.
Lai Changxing fled 12 years ago to Canadaand was extradited back to China
on July 23, 2011.The Yuan Hua Case involves the smuggling of goodsworth RMB
53 billion over a 5-year period,tax evasion of RMB 30 billion,and
implication of more than 600 people.Nearly 300 people were prosecuted for
criminal liability,and eight have been sentenced to death.According to the
law,Lai should have received the death penalty.However, CCP leadership has
promisednot to sentence him to death.
Chinese-Canadian writer Shen Xue wrote a book titled"Unveiling the Yuan Hua
Case" after interviewing Lai.The book reveals that Lai admitted that he had
contactswith 83 secretaries of high-ranking CCP cadresand has a significant
amount of inside information.
Tie Liu, a well-known writer in China, commented thatif Hu Jintao is truly
concerned with the wellbeing of the nation,then he should target the
corrupted CCP cadres.Everyone is waiting to see how he will act.
Tie Liu: Lai Changxing was a farmer. Why is he so bold?Without political
power, can he be so outrageous?I spent six years in Beijing and know
thatwith the support of the powerful, you may do whatever you like.A clean
government? This can be only a joke.They cannot run away from their
responsibilities.
Hebei-based dissident writer Zhu Xinxin believes thatnow the CCP's elite
group has formed a collective corruption.He hopes that Lai will reveal some
incriminating evidences.Whether Lai will have that chance or not is another
matter.
Zhu Xinxin: Lai has so much inside information.
Once his secrets are against China's internal interests,I am afraid it is
not impossible for them to silence him.They can find an excuse and claim
that he's sick.
First, they'll spread the word.It would just be so easy to find an excuse
for his disappearance.
Attorney Guo Lianhui said that the CCP promisednot to sentence Lai to
death.The underlying power struggle iscentered on internal problems.
Guo Lianhui: Our nation's leaders repeatedly say that
China should build a society with a rule of law,and to act according to the
rule of law.But their commitment only shows thatthe communist regime is
against the rule of law.
Zhu Xinxin mentioned that a China expert once said that
in a communist society where there is no rule of law,any precaution is
useless.It is an iron curtain; everything is in a black-box,and ultimately
even its ruler cannot control his own fate.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Li Ting and Li Anan. 2011-07-28
11:26:12http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565837.html.-【禁闻】赖昌星
案是否涉及中南海-民众热议.html
【禁闻】温州事故引民愤 传媒特警抗命
【禁闻】温州事故引民愤 传媒特警抗命
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】温州�7.23动车事件�，死伤惨重，成为中国高铁缺乏安
全的典范实例。事故发生后，中共媒体对惨剧竭尽粉饰，对于救援方式和善后工作遭到
质疑，以及死难者家人的抗议，却闭口不谈。大陆媒体一贯�将悲剧变成喜剧�的宣传
手法，在这次惨剧中暴露无遗。不过，这次事件中也发现，有特警抗命救人，和媒体抗
命报导的感人情况。下面一起来看看。
温州事故现场、医院和殡仪馆等地，这几天是哭声连天，死难者家人痛不欲生的惨状令
人痛惜。温州事故给无数家庭带来的创伤是无法弥补的。当救援方式受到质疑，当善后
工作不当引发死难者家人抗议，当地媒体却闭口不谈。
事故发生前半个多月，铁道部政治部副主任兼宣传部部长、新闻发言人王勇平，在做客
"新华网"时还声称，中国高铁大量的技术指标已经远远优于日本的�新干线�，大陆的
高铁不会发生追尾事故。
王勇平的雷语发表半个月后，温州追尾事故发生了。然而，就在温州撞车第二天，中宣
部马上下达封杀令，要求各地召回前去采访的记者。来自香港《苹果日报》消息说，有
记者回电抗命，当被问到何以如此抗命时，这名记者竟然表示，报社发召回令是�做给
上边看的�。
另外，有趣的是，报导说，温州市宣传部门派人以�协助采访�为名，请各地记者留下
服务机构和姓名，有大陆记者识破诡计，故意留个子虚乌有名称，没有多久，温州当局
竟向这个虚构机构发电，要求�召回�记者。有关记者知道后哈哈大笑说：�早知道他
们会玩这一招！�
7月25号，CCTV新闻频道午间新闻总共用了20分钟报导了�7.23列车脱轨事件�，其中
12分钟是在歌颂武警消防，歌颂医院，歌颂抢险救助安排多么及时、多么合理，其中
7分钟是在描述中央是多么重视，领导是多么亲力亲为视察安抚。只有1分钟实在讲述列
车相撞和脱轨的情况。而去挖掘这起事件的原因和纠其责任，0分钟。有市民打电话到
电台直播间投诉，刚讲一半就遭断线。
近百名死难者家人，25号晚包围温州市政府，要求当局尽快完成调查，交待真相。
不过，这次事故中与以往不同的是，竟然有敢于说实话的电视台出现。这让中共当局历
次将悲剧变成喜剧的宣传手法、自吹自演、漠视生命的本质再一次曝光。
据大陆"欣闻非常道"电台播报：0048-0129"两天以来，全国的目光似乎都集中到了这
里，各大媒体纷纷报导，网络上也是有很多的疑问？刚才我们得到的消息，《新华网》
援引温州方面的消息，现在死亡人数是38人，而铁道部的消息呢依然说是35人，21世纪
《经济时报》在它的官方的微博里提出这样的质疑。4辆满员的车厢，掉到几十米深的
铁路桥下，400多人，伤210人，死亡35人，那还有两百多人，难道是安然无恙吗？
另外，在这次事故中，给世界唯一带来喜悦的是，两岁半女童项玮伊获救，就在项玮伊
获救前13小时，当局已宣布结束救援行动。温州特警支队长邵曳戎抗命，不用吊车搬走
被撞毁的车厢，坚持在铁轨上原地清理，给了小伊伊一次生存的机会。
项玮伊获救了，但有网友担心，这名抗命队长是否会像徐勤先那样遭处分。1989年，解
放军陆军38军军长徐勤先，就因为抗命，拒绝带兵进入北京镇压示威学生，而被开除党
籍、判囚五年，出狱后，徐勤先至今仍被软禁。
新唐人记者唐睿综合报导。 2011-07-28
07:53:46http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565789.html.-【禁闻】温州事
故引民愤--传媒特警抗命.html
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】温州�7.23动车事件�，死伤惨重，成为中国高铁缺乏安
全的典范实例。事故发生后，中共媒体对惨剧竭尽粉饰，对于救援方式和善后工作遭到
质疑，以及死难者家人的抗议，却闭口不谈。大陆媒体一贯�将悲剧变成喜剧�的宣传
手法，在这次惨剧中暴露无遗。不过，这次事件中也发现，有特警抗命救人，和媒体抗
命报导的感人情况。下面一起来看看。
温州事故现场、医院和殡仪馆等地，这几天是哭声连天，死难者家人痛不欲生的惨状令
人痛惜。温州事故给无数家庭带来的创伤是无法弥补的。当救援方式受到质疑，当善后
工作不当引发死难者家人抗议，当地媒体却闭口不谈。
事故发生前半个多月，铁道部政治部副主任兼宣传部部长、新闻发言人王勇平，在做客
"新华网"时还声称，中国高铁大量的技术指标已经远远优于日本的�新干线�，大陆的
高铁不会发生追尾事故。
王勇平的雷语发表半个月后，温州追尾事故发生了。然而，就在温州撞车第二天，中宣
部马上下达封杀令，要求各地召回前去采访的记者。来自香港《苹果日报》消息说，有
记者回电抗命，当被问到何以如此抗命时，这名记者竟然表示，报社发召回令是�做给
上边看的�。
另外，有趣的是，报导说，温州市宣传部门派人以�协助采访�为名，请各地记者留下
服务机构和姓名，有大陆记者识破诡计，故意留个子虚乌有名称，没有多久，温州当局
竟向这个虚构机构发电，要求�召回�记者。有关记者知道后哈哈大笑说：�早知道他
们会玩这一招！�
7月25号，CCTV新闻频道午间新闻总共用了20分钟报导了�7.23列车脱轨事件�，其中
12分钟是在歌颂武警消防，歌颂医院，歌颂抢险救助安排多么及时、多么合理，其中
7分钟是在描述中央是多么重视，领导是多么亲力亲为视察安抚。只有1分钟实在讲述列
车相撞和脱轨的情况。而去挖掘这起事件的原因和纠其责任，0分钟。有市民打电话到
电台直播间投诉，刚讲一半就遭断线。
近百名死难者家人，25号晚包围温州市政府，要求当局尽快完成调查，交待真相。
不过，这次事故中与以往不同的是，竟然有敢于说实话的电视台出现。这让中共当局历
次将悲剧变成喜剧的宣传手法、自吹自演、漠视生命的本质再一次曝光。
据大陆"欣闻非常道"电台播报：0048-0129"两天以来，全国的目光似乎都集中到了这
里，各大媒体纷纷报导，网络上也是有很多的疑问？刚才我们得到的消息，《新华网》
援引温州方面的消息，现在死亡人数是38人，而铁道部的消息呢依然说是35人，21世纪
《经济时报》在它的官方的微博里提出这样的质疑。4辆满员的车厢，掉到几十米深的
铁路桥下，400多人，伤210人，死亡35人，那还有两百多人，难道是安然无恙吗？
另外，在这次事故中，给世界唯一带来喜悦的是，两岁半女童项玮伊获救，就在项玮伊
获救前13小时，当局已宣布结束救援行动。温州特警支队长邵曳戎抗命，不用吊车搬走
被撞毁的车厢，坚持在铁轨上原地清理，给了小伊伊一次生存的机会。
项玮伊获救了，但有网友担心，这名抗命队长是否会像徐勤先那样遭处分。1989年，解
放军陆军38军军长徐勤先，就因为抗命，拒绝带兵进入北京镇压示威学生，而被开除党
籍、判囚五年，出狱后，徐勤先至今仍被软禁。
新唐人记者唐睿综合报导。 2011-07-28
07:53:46http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565789.html.-【禁闻】温州事
故引民愤--传媒特警抗命.html
【禁闻】惨剧震裂铁道腐败王国 引高层整肃
【禁闻】惨剧震裂铁道腐败王国 引高层整肃
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】�温州动车惨剧�引发国内民愤高涨，正在掀起一场政治
风暴。国务院7月26号突然将铁道部长盛光祖等官员紧急撤离温州，召回北京，外界分
析事态极不寻常，这起事件已造成国内政治、经济大地震，胡温可能趁势撤换大批官
员，整肃由江泽民派系长期经营的�铁道部独立腐败王国�。
23号，浙江温州�动车追尾相撞事故�发生后，官方调查还没有结果就急忙定性为�天
灾�，当局72小时的搜救时间连三分之一都没过，就开始掩埋车头、毁坏证据。专家分
析事故是人为因素造成的。
香港《东方日报》斥责中共将�高铁豆腐渣�赖天灾，是�人祸国耻�。而中宣部下令
要求各地媒体不派记者去采访，特别要管好报刊和网站，不要链接高铁发展相关信
息，不做反思性报导。
26号，《新华网》公布温州动车事故死亡人数为39人，而上海《东方卫视》记者说死亡
63人。另有医院目击者称，死亡在200人左右。
造价超过三峡工程的中国高速铁路，造成铁道部的负债总额从2008年的8千多亿人民
币，激增到2010年的近19000亿元。高铁专案被外界指责是中共的政治面子工程。
李天笑(美国哥伦比亚大学政治学博士)：�它主要是为了要支撑中共政权的非法性涂上
一层光环，它这个目地就造成在高铁的技术方面、速度方面等等一定要赶上所谓'世界
第一'。在这样一种动机下，它对各种安全措施等，或者明明知道存在隐患，但是它在
高速发展的驱动力下，完全是不顾。�
当局24号免去上海铁路局局长龙京等人的职务，由总调度长安路生接任。而安路生却因
2008年胶济铁路两车相撞的人为事故，导致72人死亡、416人受伤被免职。
网友愤怒的说：�走了一头狼，来了一头豺狼，百姓是任人宰割的羊。�网民批评当局
救援迟缓，要求铁道部长盛光祖下台的呼声持续高涨。
盛光祖在2008年出任海关总署署长时，就有传闻，他是江泽民的表侄。今年2月，盛光
祖接替因腐败下台的刘志军，就任铁道部长。
唐柏桥(中国和平民主联盟主席)：�被赶下台的铁道部部长是江泽民系统的，所以它这
一次事情出来以后，势必有人会被当替罪羊抛出来，都会影响中共的权力斗争。�
铁道部一向财大势大，曾拥有自成一体的警察、通讯、医院、学校、司法等系统，堪称
�铁道独立王国�。
武汉养路工出身的刘志军，96年升任铁道部副部长，2002年被江泽民提拨为铁道部党书
记，03年出任铁道部长。据知情人披露，每次江泽民乘坐专列到各地视察，刘志军必定
放下工作，全程陪同，以保证万无一失。
2006年，刘志军的弟弟、有�天下第一票贩子�之称的武汉铁路局副局长刘志祥，因为
雇凶杀害举报者，被判处死缓，仅从他家中搜出发霉的现金就有3千多万。
2008年，刘志军依仗江派势力，力抗交通运输部的兼并，挫败了主导机构改革的团派常
务副总理李克强。
《博讯网》披露，刘志军在位期间，铁道部系统在海外吃回扣、贪污腐败工程款、倒卖
火车票，总额高达600亿人民币，其中与刘志军家族有关的达120亿元。
刘志军曾计画用20亿元买官做副总理。财新《新世纪》杂志披露，刘志军的情妇多达两
位数，与他有权钱交易的山西女富商丁书苗是主要介绍人，其中包括她投资的电视剧新
《红楼梦》的女演员。
另一位被中纪委双规的铁道部原总工程师张曙光，被称为�中国高铁技术奠基人�，他
转移到海外的存款达28亿美元。铁道部副部长王志国也被停职审查。
香港《东方日报》指出，铁道部弊端丛生，盘根错节。在�温州惨剧�调查及善后的紧
要关头，铁道部长盛光祖等官员被紧急从温州召回北京。中共中央这次可能趁势大换
血，撤换大批官员。
新唐人记者刘惠、李元翰采访报导。 2011-07-28
10:00:35http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565791.html.-【禁闻】惨剧震
裂铁道腐败王国-引高层整肃-.html
【新唐人2011年7月28日讯】�温州动车惨剧�引发国内民愤高涨，正在掀起一场政治
风暴。国务院7月26号突然将铁道部长盛光祖等官员紧急撤离温州，召回北京，外界分
析事态极不寻常，这起事件已造成国内政治、经济大地震，胡温可能趁势撤换大批官
员，整肃由江泽民派系长期经营的�铁道部独立腐败王国�。
23号，浙江温州�动车追尾相撞事故�发生后，官方调查还没有结果就急忙定性为�天
灾�，当局72小时的搜救时间连三分之一都没过，就开始掩埋车头、毁坏证据。专家分
析事故是人为因素造成的。
香港《东方日报》斥责中共将�高铁豆腐渣�赖天灾，是�人祸国耻�。而中宣部下令
要求各地媒体不派记者去采访，特别要管好报刊和网站，不要链接高铁发展相关信
息，不做反思性报导。
26号，《新华网》公布温州动车事故死亡人数为39人，而上海《东方卫视》记者说死亡
63人。另有医院目击者称，死亡在200人左右。
造价超过三峡工程的中国高速铁路，造成铁道部的负债总额从2008年的8千多亿人民
币，激增到2010年的近19000亿元。高铁专案被外界指责是中共的政治面子工程。
李天笑(美国哥伦比亚大学政治学博士)：�它主要是为了要支撑中共政权的非法性涂上
一层光环，它这个目地就造成在高铁的技术方面、速度方面等等一定要赶上所谓'世界
第一'。在这样一种动机下，它对各种安全措施等，或者明明知道存在隐患，但是它在
高速发展的驱动力下，完全是不顾。�
当局24号免去上海铁路局局长龙京等人的职务，由总调度长安路生接任。而安路生却因
2008年胶济铁路两车相撞的人为事故，导致72人死亡、416人受伤被免职。
网友愤怒的说：�走了一头狼，来了一头豺狼，百姓是任人宰割的羊。�网民批评当局
救援迟缓，要求铁道部长盛光祖下台的呼声持续高涨。
盛光祖在2008年出任海关总署署长时，就有传闻，他是江泽民的表侄。今年2月，盛光
祖接替因腐败下台的刘志军，就任铁道部长。
唐柏桥(中国和平民主联盟主席)：�被赶下台的铁道部部长是江泽民系统的，所以它这
一次事情出来以后，势必有人会被当替罪羊抛出来，都会影响中共的权力斗争。�
铁道部一向财大势大，曾拥有自成一体的警察、通讯、医院、学校、司法等系统，堪称
�铁道独立王国�。
武汉养路工出身的刘志军，96年升任铁道部副部长，2002年被江泽民提拨为铁道部党书
记，03年出任铁道部长。据知情人披露，每次江泽民乘坐专列到各地视察，刘志军必定
放下工作，全程陪同，以保证万无一失。
2006年，刘志军的弟弟、有�天下第一票贩子�之称的武汉铁路局副局长刘志祥，因为
雇凶杀害举报者，被判处死缓，仅从他家中搜出发霉的现金就有3千多万。
2008年，刘志军依仗江派势力，力抗交通运输部的兼并，挫败了主导机构改革的团派常
务副总理李克强。
《博讯网》披露，刘志军在位期间，铁道部系统在海外吃回扣、贪污腐败工程款、倒卖
火车票，总额高达600亿人民币，其中与刘志军家族有关的达120亿元。
刘志军曾计画用20亿元买官做副总理。财新《新世纪》杂志披露，刘志军的情妇多达两
位数，与他有权钱交易的山西女富商丁书苗是主要介绍人，其中包括她投资的电视剧新
《红楼梦》的女演员。
另一位被中纪委双规的铁道部原总工程师张曙光，被称为�中国高铁技术奠基人�，他
转移到海外的存款达28亿美元。铁道部副部长王志国也被停职审查。
香港《东方日报》指出，铁道部弊端丛生，盘根错节。在�温州惨剧�调查及善后的紧
要关头，铁道部长盛光祖等官员被紧急从温州召回北京。中共中央这次可能趁势大换
血，撤换大批官员。
新唐人记者刘惠、李元翰采访报导。 2011-07-28
10:00:35http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565791.html.-【禁闻】惨剧震
裂铁道腐败王国-引高层整肃-.html
【禁闻】学者：仇官仇富中国基本社会心态
【禁闻】学者：仇官仇富中国基本社会心态
【新唐人2011年7月27日讯】中国的贫富悬殊、社会不公、官民对立日趋恶化，中国人
的怨气越来越大，已构成严重的社会和政治危机。�中国社会科学院�社会问题研究中
心主任于建嵘最近指出，仇官、仇富、仇警是今天中国最基本的社会心态，中国社会将
来一定会发生非常大的动荡。
在7月20号�第22届香港书展�开幕日，著名社会学者于建嵘教授发表演讲，综述了十
年以来农民工人和市民维权的趋势，他提到：甚至连河南省的党校教师也罢课维权。
他指出，今年各地层出不穷的�群体性事件�，显示中共政权失去了民众的基本信
任，星星之火就能轻易引发�群体性事件�甚至酿成骚乱。
于建嵘：�我告诉你们一个到大陆吵架的方法，只要你和人家吵架，你实在吵不过他
了，你只要讲一句话你就赢了：'你不就是个当官的么？'讲完之后，肯定好多老百姓围
过来，'当官怎么样了。'为什么？仇官、仇富、仇警是今天中国最基本的社会心态。�
《华尔街日报》引述�中国改革基金会�国民经济研究所副所长王小鲁的独立研究
说，中国最富10%人口每年收入接近20200美元，是10%最穷人口的25倍。
�美林�公布的�2011全球财富报告�显示，2010年中国拥有百万美元以上资产的富豪
达53.5万人，位列全球第四。�世界奢侈品协会�的报告指出，2012年中国将取代日本
成为全球第一大奢侈品消费国。
中国有钱人狂购天价豪宅、钻石、名车、名表等奢侈品，而在通货膨胀的压�下，普通
劳动者的收入应付生存所需的柴米油盐和居住、医疗及子女教育，都捉襟见肘。
经济学家郎咸平教授表示，中国工人的平均工资一小时只有0.8美元，比非洲还低，位
列全球最后一名，而中国工人一年的工作时间却是全世界最长的。
欧美甚至巴西的居民消费占GDP的比重都在60-70%以上，而中国居民消费仅占GDP的
29%，郎咸平教授归因于普通中国人太贫穷。
另一方面，中共当局的财政收入却年年大幅度增长，今年上半年已超过5.6万亿，比去
年同期增长31.2%。这就是海内外学者同声指责的�国富民穷�。
于建嵘：�前一个阶段它靠的是改革开放、什么政绩、GDP、什么发展的效率；最近一
个阶段开始有人重回革命、要把原来革命的合法性又拿回来，这是共产党今天遇到的一
个很大的问题。所以它今天很困扰，什么教育都没有用，你讲所有的理论提出来，都在
老百姓那里变成了笑话。�
温家宝最近表示，不指望中国诸多社会不公问题在近期内能得到解决。原赵紫阳政治秘
书鲍彤指出，胡温现在的任务是为下一届领导班子�创造条件�、�不制造问题�，但
这种做法只会带来更多的麻烦。
目前，中共当局用于暴力维稳的经费已超过军费。于建嵘教授表示，中共为了�维稳�
不惜牺牲民生和一切资源，甚至把文革那一套都拿出来了，实际上存在巨大的风险。
于建嵘：�我们需要政治改革，而且我认为最关键的问题，今天要保障公民的言论自
由。假如我们今天每一个人都把宪法法律当成草纸，我们都怀着一腔的仇恨，我认为中
国社会将来一定会发生非常大的动荡。�
《炎黄春秋》杂志副社长、原新华社高级记者杨继绳，最近出版《中国当代社会阶层分
析》一书，引发很大反响。这本书在国内曾屡遭中宣部禁止，今年（2011年）终于解
禁，公开发售。
杨继绳指出，改革开放以来，�蛋糕�最大的部分被付出少却有权的人占有，付出最多
而没权的人只能得到剩余，这就造成了社会的仇官仇富现象。
新唐人记者李元翰、李月综合报导。
China's Officials and Wealthy Hatred
Wealth gap, conflicts between officials and the public andsocial injustice
in China are getting worse.People' grievances have developed intoserious
social and political crisis.Yu Jianrong, director of Social Research
Centerof Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS),recently pointed out
that hatred toward officials, the rich,and the police is becoming the base
of mentality in China.This can lead towards a mass scale social
turbulencein China.
On July 20, at "The 22nd Hong Kong Book Fair,"renowned sociologist
Professor Yu Jianrong gave a speechabout the trend of defending the human
rightsof migrant workers and other citizens in the past decade.He mentioned
that even teachers of the CCP's Collegein Henan Province went on strike to
defend their rights.
He pointed out that this year's continuous "mass incidents"are a reflection
of people's loss of trust in the CCP's regime.A small spark can lead to
mass-scale incidentsand even riots.
Yu Jianrong: Let me tell you how to quarrel in China.
If you are not winning the argument, you just need to say:"You are an
official, so what?"Once you say that, a lot of people would gather around
and say:"What's so great about the officials?"Why is that? The hatred
toward the government, the richand the police is the base of the social
attitudes in China today.
Wall Street Journal quoted Wang Xiaolu, a deputy chairman
of National Economic Research Instituteof China Reform Foundation in his
independent research:"The top 10% rich people in China have an annual
income25 times higher than that of the bottom 10%."
According to Merrill Lynch's 2011 World Wealth Report,in 2010, China had
535,000 millionaires, the 4th in the world.World Luxury Association (WLA)
reported that in 2012,
China is expected to take over Japan to be the #1 countryin consumption of
luxury goods.
Rich people in China acquire expensive mansions, diamonds,cars, watches and
other luxury goods.Ordinary workers, facing inflation, even have a hard
timeto afford daily necessities, health care and education expenses.
Economist and professor Lang Xianping indicated that
the average hourly salary of Chinese workers is $0.8,lower than that in
Africa, and the lowest in the world;but the Chinese workers' working hours
arethe longest.
In Europe and Brazil, consumption-GDP ratios are above 70%,while in China
it is only 29%.Professor Lang attributed that tothe poverty of ordinary
Chinese people.
Meanwhile, the CCP government revenue grows steadily,with H1 2011 reaching
$5.6 trillion, up 31.2% from 2010.This "wealthy government - poor people"
phenomenonin China is being criticized by overseas scholars.
Yu Jianrong: Previously the CCP relied on the reform,the so-called
performance, GDP and development efficiency.Recently, some people wanted to
return to the revolution,and take away the CCP's legitimacy.This is CCP's
problem of today.It is very troubled and its so-called 'party education' is
useless.All the theories they put forward are jokes to the people."
CCP's Premier Wen Jiabao recently said, he does not expectthe social
injustice to be resolved in the near future.Bao Tong, former political
secretary of Zhao Ziyang,(an ex-CCP leader but was sympathetic to the
students in 1989),pointed out that Hu Jintao and Wen are "creating
conditions"for the next leadership, but they actually bring more trouble.
Currently, the CCP's expenditures on stability maintenancevia violence has
surpassed China's national defense funding.Professor Yu said that the CCP,
in order to "maintain stability,"
uses all the resources at the expense of people's livelihood,just like it
did during the Cultural Revolution.In fact,there is a high risk.
Yu Jianrong: We need a political reform.The key issue is to safeguard
people's freedom of speech.If everyone regards the law as waste papers and
we have hatred,there will be mass turmoil in China in the future."
Yang Jisheng,VP of The Yanhuang Chunqiu Magazineand former senior reporter
of Xinhua News Agency,published "China's Contemporary Social Class
Analysis."The book had great repercussions and was bannedmultiple times by
the Ministry of Central Propaganda in China.Its ban was finally lifted in
2011.Now it is available for sale.
Yang points out that since China's reform and opening up,
the biggest part of the "pie" belongs to a small numberof people with
power, who did not contribute much for it.Those who work hard for it do not
get any,and this has resulted in hatred of the officials and the rich.
NTD reporters Li Yuanhan and Li Yue 2011-07-28
05:02:30http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565276.html.-【禁闻】学
者：仇官仇富中国基本社会心态.html
【新唐人2011年7月27日讯】中国的贫富悬殊、社会不公、官民对立日趋恶化，中国人
的怨气越来越大，已构成严重的社会和政治危机。�中国社会科学院�社会问题研究中
心主任于建嵘最近指出，仇官、仇富、仇警是今天中国最基本的社会心态，中国社会将
来一定会发生非常大的动荡。
在7月20号�第22届香港书展�开幕日，著名社会学者于建嵘教授发表演讲，综述了十
年以来农民工人和市民维权的趋势，他提到：甚至连河南省的党校教师也罢课维权。
他指出，今年各地层出不穷的�群体性事件�，显示中共政权失去了民众的基本信
任，星星之火就能轻易引发�群体性事件�甚至酿成骚乱。
于建嵘：�我告诉你们一个到大陆吵架的方法，只要你和人家吵架，你实在吵不过他
了，你只要讲一句话你就赢了：'你不就是个当官的么？'讲完之后，肯定好多老百姓围
过来，'当官怎么样了。'为什么？仇官、仇富、仇警是今天中国最基本的社会心态。�
《华尔街日报》引述�中国改革基金会�国民经济研究所副所长王小鲁的独立研究
说，中国最富10%人口每年收入接近20200美元，是10%最穷人口的25倍。
�美林�公布的�2011全球财富报告�显示，2010年中国拥有百万美元以上资产的富豪
达53.5万人，位列全球第四。�世界奢侈品协会�的报告指出，2012年中国将取代日本
成为全球第一大奢侈品消费国。
中国有钱人狂购天价豪宅、钻石、名车、名表等奢侈品，而在通货膨胀的压�下，普通
劳动者的收入应付生存所需的柴米油盐和居住、医疗及子女教育，都捉襟见肘。
经济学家郎咸平教授表示，中国工人的平均工资一小时只有0.8美元，比非洲还低，位
列全球最后一名，而中国工人一年的工作时间却是全世界最长的。
欧美甚至巴西的居民消费占GDP的比重都在60-70%以上，而中国居民消费仅占GDP的
29%，郎咸平教授归因于普通中国人太贫穷。
另一方面，中共当局的财政收入却年年大幅度增长，今年上半年已超过5.6万亿，比去
年同期增长31.2%。这就是海内外学者同声指责的�国富民穷�。
于建嵘：�前一个阶段它靠的是改革开放、什么政绩、GDP、什么发展的效率；最近一
个阶段开始有人重回革命、要把原来革命的合法性又拿回来，这是共产党今天遇到的一
个很大的问题。所以它今天很困扰，什么教育都没有用，你讲所有的理论提出来，都在
老百姓那里变成了笑话。�
温家宝最近表示，不指望中国诸多社会不公问题在近期内能得到解决。原赵紫阳政治秘
书鲍彤指出，胡温现在的任务是为下一届领导班子�创造条件�、�不制造问题�，但
这种做法只会带来更多的麻烦。
目前，中共当局用于暴力维稳的经费已超过军费。于建嵘教授表示，中共为了�维稳�
不惜牺牲民生和一切资源，甚至把文革那一套都拿出来了，实际上存在巨大的风险。
于建嵘：�我们需要政治改革，而且我认为最关键的问题，今天要保障公民的言论自
由。假如我们今天每一个人都把宪法法律当成草纸，我们都怀着一腔的仇恨，我认为中
国社会将来一定会发生非常大的动荡。�
《炎黄春秋》杂志副社长、原新华社高级记者杨继绳，最近出版《中国当代社会阶层分
析》一书，引发很大反响。这本书在国内曾屡遭中宣部禁止，今年（2011年）终于解
禁，公开发售。
杨继绳指出，改革开放以来，�蛋糕�最大的部分被付出少却有权的人占有，付出最多
而没权的人只能得到剩余，这就造成了社会的仇官仇富现象。
新唐人记者李元翰、李月综合报导。
China's Officials and Wealthy Hatred
Wealth gap, conflicts between officials and the public andsocial injustice
in China are getting worse.People' grievances have developed intoserious
social and political crisis.Yu Jianrong, director of Social Research
Centerof Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS),recently pointed out
that hatred toward officials, the rich,and the police is becoming the base
of mentality in China.This can lead towards a mass scale social
turbulencein China.
On July 20, at "The 22nd Hong Kong Book Fair,"renowned sociologist
Professor Yu Jianrong gave a speechabout the trend of defending the human
rightsof migrant workers and other citizens in the past decade.He mentioned
that even teachers of the CCP's Collegein Henan Province went on strike to
defend their rights.
He pointed out that this year's continuous "mass incidents"are a reflection
of people's loss of trust in the CCP's regime.A small spark can lead to
mass-scale incidentsand even riots.
Yu Jianrong: Let me tell you how to quarrel in China.
If you are not winning the argument, you just need to say:"You are an
official, so what?"Once you say that, a lot of people would gather around
and say:"What's so great about the officials?"Why is that? The hatred
toward the government, the richand the police is the base of the social
attitudes in China today.
Wall Street Journal quoted Wang Xiaolu, a deputy chairman
of National Economic Research Instituteof China Reform Foundation in his
independent research:"The top 10% rich people in China have an annual
income25 times higher than that of the bottom 10%."
According to Merrill Lynch's 2011 World Wealth Report,in 2010, China had
535,000 millionaires, the 4th in the world.World Luxury Association (WLA)
reported that in 2012,
China is expected to take over Japan to be the #1 countryin consumption of
luxury goods.
Rich people in China acquire expensive mansions, diamonds,cars, watches and
other luxury goods.Ordinary workers, facing inflation, even have a hard
timeto afford daily necessities, health care and education expenses.
Economist and professor Lang Xianping indicated that
the average hourly salary of Chinese workers is $0.8,lower than that in
Africa, and the lowest in the world;but the Chinese workers' working hours
arethe longest.
In Europe and Brazil, consumption-GDP ratios are above 70%,while in China
it is only 29%.Professor Lang attributed that tothe poverty of ordinary
Chinese people.
Meanwhile, the CCP government revenue grows steadily,with H1 2011 reaching
$5.6 trillion, up 31.2% from 2010.This "wealthy government - poor people"
phenomenonin China is being criticized by overseas scholars.
Yu Jianrong: Previously the CCP relied on the reform,the so-called
performance, GDP and development efficiency.Recently, some people wanted to
return to the revolution,and take away the CCP's legitimacy.This is CCP's
problem of today.It is very troubled and its so-called 'party education' is
useless.All the theories they put forward are jokes to the people."
CCP's Premier Wen Jiabao recently said, he does not expectthe social
injustice to be resolved in the near future.Bao Tong, former political
secretary of Zhao Ziyang,(an ex-CCP leader but was sympathetic to the
students in 1989),pointed out that Hu Jintao and Wen are "creating
conditions"for the next leadership, but they actually bring more trouble.
Currently, the CCP's expenditures on stability maintenancevia violence has
surpassed China's national defense funding.Professor Yu said that the CCP,
in order to "maintain stability,"
uses all the resources at the expense of people's livelihood,just like it
did during the Cultural Revolution.In fact,there is a high risk.
Yu Jianrong: We need a political reform.The key issue is to safeguard
people's freedom of speech.If everyone regards the law as waste papers and
we have hatred,there will be mass turmoil in China in the future."
Yang Jisheng,VP of The Yanhuang Chunqiu Magazineand former senior reporter
of Xinhua News Agency,published "China's Contemporary Social Class
Analysis."The book had great repercussions and was bannedmultiple times by
the Ministry of Central Propaganda in China.Its ban was finally lifted in
2011.Now it is available for sale.
Yang points out that since China's reform and opening up,
the biggest part of the "pie" belongs to a small numberof people with
power, who did not contribute much for it.Those who work hard for it do not
get any,and this has resulted in hatred of the officials and the rich.
NTD reporters Li Yuanhan and Li Yue 2011-07-28
05:02:30http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/28/a565276.html.-【禁闻】学
者：仇官仇富中国基本社会心态.html
【禁闻】恐成�第二个钱云会�律师求助
【禁闻】恐成�第二个钱云会�律师求助
【新唐人2011年7月26日讯】山东旭洲律师事务所主任舒向新，因为帮助失地农民维
权，遭到当局打压和黑社会的死亡威胁。舒向新表示，当局把老百姓维权的路都堵死
了，他已经向北京数名大律师求助，以防自己遭遇不测，�成为第二个钱云会�。
山东聊城市冠县农民，曾多次进京举报县委书记洪玉振违法征地等问题，但都是无功而
返。今年（2011年）3月，舒向新接受农民委托代理这个案件。
舒向新：�他们从01年到今年3月找我之前，其中有一个村已经有60多人次进京上访
了，没有解决。然后他们再次上山东省政府上访的时候�别人介绍，然后到我们律师事
务所来谘询的。老百姓他们的证据材料很多也很全面，我认为老百姓说的是有道理。�
舒向新接受农民的委托后，当地政府李东朝主任以及冠县国土局一名姓刑的负责人多次
找到舒向新�沟通�，甚至贿赂给钱。舒向新表示，由于这些官员不打算解决农民的赔
偿问题，他没有同意官员的条件，谈判破裂。
3月31号下午，舒向新的同事在网上发贴曝光了冠县违法征地的现象，触怒当局，舒向
新和他的事务所开始面临前所未有的灾难。
舒向新：�结果这个帖子就惹下大祸了，在4月1号下午4点左右，有四个自称黑道的人
上办公室找我去了，用他们的说法是想办我。我不在办公室，就说了好多威胁的恐吓
话，黑道连续的给我打电话，发简讯，对我恐吓威胁。包括15天让你失去吃饭的家
伙，然后让我滚出济南。�
舒向新表示，他报警后，济南市公安局没有对黑社会做出任何处理。同时冠县官员在网
路上发表了�无良律师舒向新敲诈钱财�、�舒大律师自导自演黑社会�等帖子，并且
帖子中出现了�让舒向新律师全家都一个个出车祸撞死�等内容！并且封锁了律师事务
所网站。
舒向新：�到了4月13号，冠县的纪委书记，叫韩金芳。她找我�是与我沟通。韩金芳
书记一与我沟通，黑社会就停了，也没有恐吓了，也没有威胁了。�
舒向新还表示，冠县的纪委书记韩金芳是带着冠县一个大企业的老总去见他的，意思是
让这家企业请他担任法律顾问。他怀疑这是圈套，如果收了这个企业的钱的话，有可能
当面被抓，说是敲诈勒索，因此没有答应。
4月25号，济南市司法局暂缓舒向新所在的�旭洲律师事务所�的年检，并收缴了事务
所工作人员的律师证。
然而事情并没有到此为止。6月8号，舒向新以家长身份为侄女主办婚事时，济南市刑警
支队刑警到济阳他的老家，当着亲友将他拘传，拘禁了19个小时后才放人。与此同
时，另一批刑警到舒律师单位没收了他所代理的冠县20多个案件的全部卷宗，拿走了单
位的公章、财务章、发票、支票及全部电脑主机等物品。
律师事务所垮了，家人每天不敢出门，舒向新已经到北京公安部以及地方相关部门上
访，但至今没有任何回音。他说，他已经向北京数名大律师求助，以防自己遭遇不
测，�成为第二个钱云会�。
新唐人记者白梅、李明飞，周平采访报导。
Endangered Lawyer Appeals
Shu Xiangxin, director of the Shandong Xuzhou law firmis suppressed by the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP)and received death threats from the local
mafia,only because he campaigned for farmers who lost their land.Shu said
that the CCP had blockedpeople's ways to appeal.He has asked for the help
of several lawyers in Beijingin case he meets a terrible end.
Farmers from Liaocheng City, Shandong Province,have repeatedly petitioned
in Beijingabout the county CCP secretary's illegal land acquisition,without
success.In March 2011, Shu accepted their caseand acted as their legal
representative.
Shu: From 2001 to March 2011, over 60 people fromone village have gone to
Beijing to petition.But the authorities did not solve their problem.So,
they turned to my law office for legal advice.After reviewing their
evidence and other materials,I reasoned that their appeals make sense.
After Shu accepted the case, the local government officerswanted to
negotiate with and even bribe him to give up.As these officials didn't
intend to compensate the farmers,Shu didn't accept their offerings. The
negotiation broke down.
On March 31, Shu's colleague exposed online the Guanxian authorities'
illegalland acquisition, which offended them.So, Shu and his law firm faced
unprecedented disaster.
Shu: This online posting led to a big disaster.
Around 4 p.m. on April 1, four gangsters came to my officeand claimed to
"handle" me.Luckily, I was not in the office, so they threatened the
staff.They kept calling and messaging me with threats.They said that they
would cause me to lose my job in 15 days,and kick me out of Jinan.
Shu reported them to the police.However, Jinan Police Bureau did not do
anything.Meanwhile, Guanxian officials tried to disrepute him online,by
posting "unscrupulous lawyer Shu extorts money".They even posted,"Shu's
family will be made to die in car accidents!"They also blocked the website
of Shu's law firm.
Shu: On April 13, Han Jinfang, the secretary ofCommittee for Discipline
Inspection of Guan County,wanted to have a word with me.
After the conversation,all threats and intimidations stopped abruptly."
Shu said that, Han came to him with a large company's CEO.She said that the
CEO wants to hire him as a legal consultant.Shu suspected this to be a
trap,so he didn't accept the offer.
On April 25, Judicial Bureau of Jinan Citysuspended Shu's law firm's annual
inspection.And they confiscated all his staff lawyers'legal qualification
certificates.
On June 8, when he was hosting his niece's wedding,the police arrested him
in front of all guests.He was later released after 19 hours of detention.
Meanwhile, police went to his firm andconfiscated documents of more than 20
clients' cases.They also took away his office's seals, invoices,
checks,computers and other items.
Now Shu's law firm collapsed,and his family is too scared to go out of
home.Shu went to Beijing to petition, without getting any response.
He said that he had already asked for help from several lawyers,in case he
would be murdered by the local CCP authorities.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Li Mingfei and Zhou Ping 2011-07-26
09:49:09http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/26/a564807.html.-【禁闻】恐成�
第二个钱云会�律师求助.html
【新唐人2011年7月26日讯】山东旭洲律师事务所主任舒向新，因为帮助失地农民维
权，遭到当局打压和黑社会的死亡威胁。舒向新表示，当局把老百姓维权的路都堵死
了，他已经向北京数名大律师求助，以防自己遭遇不测，�成为第二个钱云会�。
山东聊城市冠县农民，曾多次进京举报县委书记洪玉振违法征地等问题，但都是无功而
返。今年（2011年）3月，舒向新接受农民委托代理这个案件。
舒向新：�他们从01年到今年3月找我之前，其中有一个村已经有60多人次进京上访
了，没有解决。然后他们再次上山东省政府上访的时候�别人介绍，然后到我们律师事
务所来谘询的。老百姓他们的证据材料很多也很全面，我认为老百姓说的是有道理。�
舒向新接受农民的委托后，当地政府李东朝主任以及冠县国土局一名姓刑的负责人多次
找到舒向新�沟通�，甚至贿赂给钱。舒向新表示，由于这些官员不打算解决农民的赔
偿问题，他没有同意官员的条件，谈判破裂。
3月31号下午，舒向新的同事在网上发贴曝光了冠县违法征地的现象，触怒当局，舒向
新和他的事务所开始面临前所未有的灾难。
舒向新：�结果这个帖子就惹下大祸了，在4月1号下午4点左右，有四个自称黑道的人
上办公室找我去了，用他们的说法是想办我。我不在办公室，就说了好多威胁的恐吓
话，黑道连续的给我打电话，发简讯，对我恐吓威胁。包括15天让你失去吃饭的家
伙，然后让我滚出济南。�
舒向新表示，他报警后，济南市公安局没有对黑社会做出任何处理。同时冠县官员在网
路上发表了�无良律师舒向新敲诈钱财�、�舒大律师自导自演黑社会�等帖子，并且
帖子中出现了�让舒向新律师全家都一个个出车祸撞死�等内容！并且封锁了律师事务
所网站。
舒向新：�到了4月13号，冠县的纪委书记，叫韩金芳。她找我�是与我沟通。韩金芳
书记一与我沟通，黑社会就停了，也没有恐吓了，也没有威胁了。�
舒向新还表示，冠县的纪委书记韩金芳是带着冠县一个大企业的老总去见他的，意思是
让这家企业请他担任法律顾问。他怀疑这是圈套，如果收了这个企业的钱的话，有可能
当面被抓，说是敲诈勒索，因此没有答应。
4月25号，济南市司法局暂缓舒向新所在的�旭洲律师事务所�的年检，并收缴了事务
所工作人员的律师证。
然而事情并没有到此为止。6月8号，舒向新以家长身份为侄女主办婚事时，济南市刑警
支队刑警到济阳他的老家，当着亲友将他拘传，拘禁了19个小时后才放人。与此同
时，另一批刑警到舒律师单位没收了他所代理的冠县20多个案件的全部卷宗，拿走了单
位的公章、财务章、发票、支票及全部电脑主机等物品。
律师事务所垮了，家人每天不敢出门，舒向新已经到北京公安部以及地方相关部门上
访，但至今没有任何回音。他说，他已经向北京数名大律师求助，以防自己遭遇不
测，�成为第二个钱云会�。
新唐人记者白梅、李明飞，周平采访报导。
Endangered Lawyer Appeals
Shu Xiangxin, director of the Shandong Xuzhou law firmis suppressed by the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP)and received death threats from the local
mafia,only because he campaigned for farmers who lost their land.Shu said
that the CCP had blockedpeople's ways to appeal.He has asked for the help
of several lawyers in Beijingin case he meets a terrible end.
Farmers from Liaocheng City, Shandong Province,have repeatedly petitioned
in Beijingabout the county CCP secretary's illegal land acquisition,without
success.In March 2011, Shu accepted their caseand acted as their legal
representative.
Shu: From 2001 to March 2011, over 60 people fromone village have gone to
Beijing to petition.But the authorities did not solve their problem.So,
they turned to my law office for legal advice.After reviewing their
evidence and other materials,I reasoned that their appeals make sense.
After Shu accepted the case, the local government officerswanted to
negotiate with and even bribe him to give up.As these officials didn't
intend to compensate the farmers,Shu didn't accept their offerings. The
negotiation broke down.
On March 31, Shu's colleague exposed online the Guanxian authorities'
illegalland acquisition, which offended them.So, Shu and his law firm faced
unprecedented disaster.
Shu: This online posting led to a big disaster.
Around 4 p.m. on April 1, four gangsters came to my officeand claimed to
"handle" me.Luckily, I was not in the office, so they threatened the
staff.They kept calling and messaging me with threats.They said that they
would cause me to lose my job in 15 days,and kick me out of Jinan.
Shu reported them to the police.However, Jinan Police Bureau did not do
anything.Meanwhile, Guanxian officials tried to disrepute him online,by
posting "unscrupulous lawyer Shu extorts money".They even posted,"Shu's
family will be made to die in car accidents!"They also blocked the website
of Shu's law firm.
Shu: On April 13, Han Jinfang, the secretary ofCommittee for Discipline
Inspection of Guan County,wanted to have a word with me.
After the conversation,all threats and intimidations stopped abruptly."
Shu said that, Han came to him with a large company's CEO.She said that the
CEO wants to hire him as a legal consultant.Shu suspected this to be a
trap,so he didn't accept the offer.
On April 25, Judicial Bureau of Jinan Citysuspended Shu's law firm's annual
inspection.And they confiscated all his staff lawyers'legal qualification
certificates.
On June 8, when he was hosting his niece's wedding,the police arrested him
in front of all guests.He was later released after 19 hours of detention.
Meanwhile, police went to his firm andconfiscated documents of more than 20
clients' cases.They also took away his office's seals, invoices,
checks,computers and other items.
Now Shu's law firm collapsed,and his family is too scared to go out of
home.Shu went to Beijing to petition, without getting any response.
He said that he had already asked for help from several lawyers,in case he
would be murdered by the local CCP authorities.
NTD reporters Bai Mei, Li Mingfei and Zhou Ping 2011-07-26
09:49:09http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/26/a564807.html.-【禁闻】恐成�
第二个钱云会�律师求助.html
2011年7月26日星期二
【禁闻】赖案涉深高层黑幕 胡掌牌分化江派
【禁闻】赖案涉深高层黑幕 胡掌牌分化江派
【新唐人2011年7月27日讯】�远华走私案�主犯赖昌星7月23号被遣返回北京后，当即
被警方逮捕，加上江泽民死讯风波尚未平息，中共高层派系斗争呈现白热化。这几天北
京气氛非常紧张，一些区域处于戒严状态。外界分析指出，赖昌星案提供了打开江派黑
箱的钥匙，胡锦涛有招降分化江派之意和举动。
就在赖昌星被遣返的当天，中共中央军委主席胡锦涛晋升6人上将军衔，其中一人是总
政治部副主任贾廷安，他曾经担任�远华案�调查组副组长。另一位是海军政委刘晓
江，他是前总书记胡耀邦的女婿，曾主持海军涉及�远华案�调查。
原江泽民办公室主任贾廷安并非军人出身，他早在2005年就晋升中将，去年已具备晋升
上将资格，但却意外落选。近年来，胡锦涛晋升将军，一再打破常规，以化解江泽民在
军中的人事布局。
而就在赖昌星被引渡回国的这个时刻，贾廷安却被晋升上将。旅美学者何清涟认为，胡
锦涛这个动作表明权力依然由他掌控，他把赖昌星这张牌抓在手中，引而不发，以示威
慑。
1999年立案的�远华案�，由朱�基主导，关系到他与江泽民的权力斗争。但在关键时
候，赖昌星因贾廷安等人通风报信，逃到加拿大寻求政治庇护。
赖昌星在《远华案黑幕》一书中透露，他和江泽民五个秘书中的三个都很熟，包括管文
件的�大秘书�贾廷安，经常和他聊天，赖昌星透过秘书经常去江泽民家。
盛雪《远华案黑幕》作者：�因为我写了这本《远华案黑幕》，当时他只跟我说他跟中
共高层的83个秘书关系很好，我说这83个秘书是什么概念呢？他说，像吴仪以下的就不
算了。�
�远华案�涉及走私逃税达830亿元人民币，共有近千人被查处，21人被判死刑或死
缓。现任三名政治局常委贾庆林、贺国强和习近平，在�远华案�期间主政福建。专案
组搜出贾庆林到�远华公司�和赖昌星的合影，贾庆林通过主管福建外贸的妻子林幼芳
得到赖昌星大量好处。
贾庆林是江泽民的老部下，江曾公开提出对贾庆林的问题要�一批、二帮、三保�，并
指令政法委书记罗干下达了四条指示。赖昌星曾说，专案组要抓他回去，真要回去，说
出贾庆林来，贾就完了。
盛雪：�而且这个案子还不仅仅是这样一条线索，包括在军情部的线索，军情部由于姬
胜德跟熊光楷之间的矛盾冲突；包括公安的线索，包括公安李纪周跟贾春旺之间的矛盾
冲突。很多线索最后结成这个事件的大网。�
在赖昌星的关系网中，包括军队的许多高级将领，如：前军委副主席张震、刘华清等
人。而�远华案�中，军方涉足走私很深，但处罚的级别只到总参情报部常务副部长姬
胜德少将。
江泽民的亲信、前副总理李岚清，是镇压法轮功�610办公室�的前头目，他的儿子李
志群与赖昌星关系密切，两人曾在一起做生意、在香港抄股，李志群涉及中国重型汽车
集团大案，贪污十多亿元，李岚清曾向江泽民哭诉求救。
在�红楼�的赖昌星办公室里有两张照片，一张是他与前公安部副部长李纪周等4人的
照片，这张照片上的人全被抓了；另一张是他与李岚清、李铁映、刘华清、王汉斌等
6人的照片，这6人全没动。
盛雪：�我那时问过他这么一句话，我说：'有传说，说你赖昌星如果要是被遣返的
话，一下飞机就会有一个政治局的委员自杀。'他马上说：'那肯定不是贾庆林。'那意
思就是说，有人比贾庆林的情况和问题要严重得多。�
胡锦涛是否有魄力借赖昌星案整垮江派，外界不少舆论并不看好。不过，也有分析指
出，中共权力斗争历来腥风血雨，不能排除一旦时机成熟，胡锦涛会像查处陈良宇一
样，引爆贾庆林等人大案，全面扳倒江派的可能。
新唐人记者李元翰、王明宇综合报导。
Hu Splits Jiang's Camp
On July 23, Yuan Hua Smuggling Case culprit Lai Changxingwas sent back to
Beijing and immediately arrested.This incident and the rumored death of
Jiang Zemin,the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) ex-leader,have intensified
the internal power struggleamong the CCP's high-level factions.The
atmosphere in Beijing is very tense these days,with some districts
implementing martial law.Outside analysts point out that Lai's caseprovides
a key to the criminal evidence of Jiang's camp.Hu Jintao seems to intend to
split Jiang's faction.
On the day of Lai Changxing's repatriation, CCP CentralMilitary Commission
Chairman Hu Jintao promoted six generals.One of the six was Jia Ting'an.He
is Deputy Director ofthe General Political Department and Vice Chair ofYuan
Hua Case investigation team.Another is the Political Commissar of the Navy,
Liu Xiaojiangson-in-law of the former General Secretary Hu Yaobang.Liu
leads the navy and was involvedin the investigation of Yuan Hua Case.
Jia Ting'an, former Director of Jiang Zemin's Office, was notof military
background, became Lieutenant General in 2005.He wasn't promoted to general
in 2010, though eligible for it.
In recent years, Hu promoted personnel in the military systemin order to
break Jiang's personal arrangement in the military.
At the moment of Lai's extradition,Jia Ting'an was promoted to
general.U.S.-based scholar, He Qinglian, thinks thatHu Jintao is trying to
demonstrate power.Hu uses Lai as a trump cardto intimidate his opponents.
The Yuan Hua Case was established in 1999.Its investigation was led by
ex-Premier Zhu Rongji.It involved Zhu's struggle with Jiang Zemin.
At a crucial moment, Lai was notified by Jia Ting'an,and escaped to Canada,
seeking political asylum.
In the book "Unveiling the Yuan Hua Case,"Lai revealed that he was very
close with 3 of the 5 secretariesof Jiang Zemin, including Jia Ting'an,the
secretary-in-charge.Lai always chatted with Jia and frequently visited
Jiang's homethrough the arrangements made by Jiang's secretaries.
Shen Xue (author of Unveiling the Yuan Hua Case):
When I wrote this book, Lai told me that he had very goodrelationships with
83 secretaries of high-level CCP officials.I asked him, 'Which 83
secretaries?'He said, "Not including those below Wu Yi."(Wu Yi was the
highest-ranking female CCP official.)
The Yuan Hua Case involved RMB 83 billion.
Nearly 1,000 people were under investigation.21 were sentenced to
death.Three current members of Politburo, Jia Qinglin, He Guoqiangand Xi
Jinping, were in charge of Fujian at that time.The investigation team found
photosof Jia Qinglin and Lai Changxing.Jia also recieved lots of benefits
from Lai through Jia's wife,Lin Youfang, who was in charge of foreign trade
in Fujian.
Jia Qinglin was Jiang Zemin's long-term subordinate.Jiang publicly said of
Jia: "To criticize, help and protect him."Jiang also issued four directions
through Luo Gan,the secretary of Politics and Law Committee.Lai once said
that if the investigation team gets him back,and he talks about Jia. Jia
would be finished.
Sheng Xue: This case does not have only this one clue.It also involves the
military intelligence organizations,public security bureaus, etc.The clues
form a huge net.
Many high-ranking military officials werewithin Lai's network,such as
ex-Deputy Chair of Military CommitteeZhang Zhen and Liu Huaqing.But those
punished were only as high-ranking as Deputy Chairof the Intelligence
Department, Major-General Ji Shengde.
Confidant of Jiang, ex-Deputy Premier Li Lanqing wasthe ex-leader of the
610 Office.The 610 Office was established specifically to persecuteFalun
Dafa practitioners.Li Lanqing's son Li Zhiqun was very close to Lai.They
did business together and invested in stocks in Hong Kong.Li Zhiqun
embezzled RMB 1 billionfrom the China National Heavy Duty Truck Group.To
save his son, Li Lanqing asked Jiang's help.
In Lai's office in his "Red Mansion", there are two photos.One is of Lai
and ex-Vice Minister of Public Security Li Jizhouand other two people. All
of them have been arrested.Another photo is of Lai and Li Lanqing, Li
Tieying,Liu Huaqing, Wang Hanbin and others.None of these people was put
under investigation.
Sheng Xue: I asked him, "It is said that if you are sent back,a standing
committee member of Politburo will commit suicide."He said right away, "It
shouldn't be Jia Qinglin."
He implied that someone has committeda more serious crime than Jia in Yuan
Hua Case.
Is Hu Jintao capable of destroying Jiang's camp through Lai?The outside
world doesn't think so.However, some analysts point out thatthe CCP has
always been violent in power struggles.It is also possible that Hu will
establish a major caseof Jia Qinglin at the right time, to disintegrate
Jiang's faction.
NTD reporters Li Yuanhan and Wang Mingyu 2011-07-27
11:47:44http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/27/a565323.html.-【禁闻】赖案涉
深高层黑幕-胡掌牌分化江派.html
【新唐人2011年7月27日讯】�远华走私案�主犯赖昌星7月23号被遣返回北京后，当即
被警方逮捕，加上江泽民死讯风波尚未平息，中共高层派系斗争呈现白热化。这几天北
京气氛非常紧张，一些区域处于戒严状态。外界分析指出，赖昌星案提供了打开江派黑
箱的钥匙，胡锦涛有招降分化江派之意和举动。
就在赖昌星被遣返的当天，中共中央军委主席胡锦涛晋升6人上将军衔，其中一人是总
政治部副主任贾廷安，他曾经担任�远华案�调查组副组长。另一位是海军政委刘晓
江，他是前总书记胡耀邦的女婿，曾主持海军涉及�远华案�调查。
原江泽民办公室主任贾廷安并非军人出身，他早在2005年就晋升中将，去年已具备晋升
上将资格，但却意外落选。近年来，胡锦涛晋升将军，一再打破常规，以化解江泽民在
军中的人事布局。
而就在赖昌星被引渡回国的这个时刻，贾廷安却被晋升上将。旅美学者何清涟认为，胡
锦涛这个动作表明权力依然由他掌控，他把赖昌星这张牌抓在手中，引而不发，以示威
慑。
1999年立案的�远华案�，由朱�基主导，关系到他与江泽民的权力斗争。但在关键时
候，赖昌星因贾廷安等人通风报信，逃到加拿大寻求政治庇护。
赖昌星在《远华案黑幕》一书中透露，他和江泽民五个秘书中的三个都很熟，包括管文
件的�大秘书�贾廷安，经常和他聊天，赖昌星透过秘书经常去江泽民家。
盛雪《远华案黑幕》作者：�因为我写了这本《远华案黑幕》，当时他只跟我说他跟中
共高层的83个秘书关系很好，我说这83个秘书是什么概念呢？他说，像吴仪以下的就不
算了。�
�远华案�涉及走私逃税达830亿元人民币，共有近千人被查处，21人被判死刑或死
缓。现任三名政治局常委贾庆林、贺国强和习近平，在�远华案�期间主政福建。专案
组搜出贾庆林到�远华公司�和赖昌星的合影，贾庆林通过主管福建外贸的妻子林幼芳
得到赖昌星大量好处。
贾庆林是江泽民的老部下，江曾公开提出对贾庆林的问题要�一批、二帮、三保�，并
指令政法委书记罗干下达了四条指示。赖昌星曾说，专案组要抓他回去，真要回去，说
出贾庆林来，贾就完了。
盛雪：�而且这个案子还不仅仅是这样一条线索，包括在军情部的线索，军情部由于姬
胜德跟熊光楷之间的矛盾冲突；包括公安的线索，包括公安李纪周跟贾春旺之间的矛盾
冲突。很多线索最后结成这个事件的大网。�
在赖昌星的关系网中，包括军队的许多高级将领，如：前军委副主席张震、刘华清等
人。而�远华案�中，军方涉足走私很深，但处罚的级别只到总参情报部常务副部长姬
胜德少将。
江泽民的亲信、前副总理李岚清，是镇压法轮功�610办公室�的前头目，他的儿子李
志群与赖昌星关系密切，两人曾在一起做生意、在香港抄股，李志群涉及中国重型汽车
集团大案，贪污十多亿元，李岚清曾向江泽民哭诉求救。
在�红楼�的赖昌星办公室里有两张照片，一张是他与前公安部副部长李纪周等4人的
照片，这张照片上的人全被抓了；另一张是他与李岚清、李铁映、刘华清、王汉斌等
6人的照片，这6人全没动。
盛雪：�我那时问过他这么一句话，我说：'有传说，说你赖昌星如果要是被遣返的
话，一下飞机就会有一个政治局的委员自杀。'他马上说：'那肯定不是贾庆林。'那意
思就是说，有人比贾庆林的情况和问题要严重得多。�
胡锦涛是否有魄力借赖昌星案整垮江派，外界不少舆论并不看好。不过，也有分析指
出，中共权力斗争历来腥风血雨，不能排除一旦时机成熟，胡锦涛会像查处陈良宇一
样，引爆贾庆林等人大案，全面扳倒江派的可能。
新唐人记者李元翰、王明宇综合报导。
Hu Splits Jiang's Camp
On July 23, Yuan Hua Smuggling Case culprit Lai Changxingwas sent back to
Beijing and immediately arrested.This incident and the rumored death of
Jiang Zemin,the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) ex-leader,have intensified
the internal power struggleamong the CCP's high-level factions.The
atmosphere in Beijing is very tense these days,with some districts
implementing martial law.Outside analysts point out that Lai's caseprovides
a key to the criminal evidence of Jiang's camp.Hu Jintao seems to intend to
split Jiang's faction.
On the day of Lai Changxing's repatriation, CCP CentralMilitary Commission
Chairman Hu Jintao promoted six generals.One of the six was Jia Ting'an.He
is Deputy Director ofthe General Political Department and Vice Chair ofYuan
Hua Case investigation team.Another is the Political Commissar of the Navy,
Liu Xiaojiangson-in-law of the former General Secretary Hu Yaobang.Liu
leads the navy and was involvedin the investigation of Yuan Hua Case.
Jia Ting'an, former Director of Jiang Zemin's Office, was notof military
background, became Lieutenant General in 2005.He wasn't promoted to general
in 2010, though eligible for it.
In recent years, Hu promoted personnel in the military systemin order to
break Jiang's personal arrangement in the military.
At the moment of Lai's extradition,Jia Ting'an was promoted to
general.U.S.-based scholar, He Qinglian, thinks thatHu Jintao is trying to
demonstrate power.Hu uses Lai as a trump cardto intimidate his opponents.
The Yuan Hua Case was established in 1999.Its investigation was led by
ex-Premier Zhu Rongji.It involved Zhu's struggle with Jiang Zemin.
At a crucial moment, Lai was notified by Jia Ting'an,and escaped to Canada,
seeking political asylum.
In the book "Unveiling the Yuan Hua Case,"Lai revealed that he was very
close with 3 of the 5 secretariesof Jiang Zemin, including Jia Ting'an,the
secretary-in-charge.Lai always chatted with Jia and frequently visited
Jiang's homethrough the arrangements made by Jiang's secretaries.
Shen Xue (author of Unveiling the Yuan Hua Case):
When I wrote this book, Lai told me that he had very goodrelationships with
83 secretaries of high-level CCP officials.I asked him, 'Which 83
secretaries?'He said, "Not including those below Wu Yi."(Wu Yi was the
highest-ranking female CCP official.)
The Yuan Hua Case involved RMB 83 billion.
Nearly 1,000 people were under investigation.21 were sentenced to
death.Three current members of Politburo, Jia Qinglin, He Guoqiangand Xi
Jinping, were in charge of Fujian at that time.The investigation team found
photosof Jia Qinglin and Lai Changxing.Jia also recieved lots of benefits
from Lai through Jia's wife,Lin Youfang, who was in charge of foreign trade
in Fujian.
Jia Qinglin was Jiang Zemin's long-term subordinate.Jiang publicly said of
Jia: "To criticize, help and protect him."Jiang also issued four directions
through Luo Gan,the secretary of Politics and Law Committee.Lai once said
that if the investigation team gets him back,and he talks about Jia. Jia
would be finished.
Sheng Xue: This case does not have only this one clue.It also involves the
military intelligence organizations,public security bureaus, etc.The clues
form a huge net.
Many high-ranking military officials werewithin Lai's network,such as
ex-Deputy Chair of Military CommitteeZhang Zhen and Liu Huaqing.But those
punished were only as high-ranking as Deputy Chairof the Intelligence
Department, Major-General Ji Shengde.
Confidant of Jiang, ex-Deputy Premier Li Lanqing wasthe ex-leader of the
610 Office.The 610 Office was established specifically to persecuteFalun
Dafa practitioners.Li Lanqing's son Li Zhiqun was very close to Lai.They
did business together and invested in stocks in Hong Kong.Li Zhiqun
embezzled RMB 1 billionfrom the China National Heavy Duty Truck Group.To
save his son, Li Lanqing asked Jiang's help.
In Lai's office in his "Red Mansion", there are two photos.One is of Lai
and ex-Vice Minister of Public Security Li Jizhouand other two people. All
of them have been arrested.Another photo is of Lai and Li Lanqing, Li
Tieying,Liu Huaqing, Wang Hanbin and others.None of these people was put
under investigation.
Sheng Xue: I asked him, "It is said that if you are sent back,a standing
committee member of Politburo will commit suicide."He said right away, "It
shouldn't be Jia Qinglin."
He implied that someone has committeda more serious crime than Jia in Yuan
Hua Case.
Is Hu Jintao capable of destroying Jiang's camp through Lai?The outside
world doesn't think so.However, some analysts point out thatthe CCP has
always been violent in power struggles.It is also possible that Hu will
establish a major caseof Jia Qinglin at the right time, to disintegrate
Jiang's faction.
NTD reporters Li Yuanhan and Wang Mingyu 2011-07-27
11:47:44http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/07/27/a565323.html.-【禁闻】赖案涉
深高层黑幕-胡掌牌分化江派.html
订阅：
博文 (Atom)