【禁闻】动车事故报告与马骋之死

【禁闻】动车事故报告与马骋之死

【新唐人2011年8月26日讯】8月22号上午，温州动车事故检查组到�中国铁路通信信号
集团公司�检查时，公司董事长马骋突发心脏病去世。舆论普遍认为，马骋因为压力过
大而崩溃。在此之前，下属公司�北京全路通信信号研究设计院�发表声明表示，愿意
对事故承担责任。

据《财新网》引述马骋朋友的话报导说，55岁的马骋原来没有心脏病史，却被诊断为心
脏病突发。《南方都市报》记者赶赴北大医院，希望查看死亡病历，遭到拒绝，负责医
生表示，"我们只能说，电视上公布的死因是正确的。"

马骋是�通号集团�前任总经理，去年底集团改制后成为董事长。

导致7．23事故的一个主要原因，据了解是列控中心资料获取驱动板出现软件逻辑错
误，致使列控中心不能即时、正确的接收资料并发送正确命令。而�通号集团�是甬台
温线的列控设备提供商，旗下的�全路通信信号设计院�正是软件设计单位。事故
后，�通号集团�成为众矢之的。

《广州日报》报导，7.23事故后，�通号集团�推迟了公司上市计划。而《21世纪经济
报导》披露，�通号集团�上下员工都接受过国务院调查组问询，包括"马骋也被叫去
谈过话"。

《每日经济新闻》报导援引"7．23"事故调查组专家组副组长王梦恕原话说，"信号是有
些问题，也不至于追尾。"。王梦恕意味深长的指出，7.23事故诱因肯定是"管理的问题
大于技术的问题"。

北京学者彭定鼎对马骋之死表示同情。

彭定鼎（北京学者）：�如果我要是他，我就不会这样紧张了。我已经说过多少次
了，关于事故，不是在于引发原因是什么。要点在于，当出现故障以后，一个预案，针
对故障的安全预案为什么没有启动。�

《华尔街日报》报导，中共当局本周表示，已就造成两列高速列车追尾并导致40人死亡
的事故原因，得出了初步调查结果，将于9月中旬之前公布这一结果。�安全生产监督
管理总局�发言人黄毅说，调查组现已初步完成了事故的技术报告，以及事故直接原因
的专家组报告，下一步的工作即将进入事故责任的认定阶段。

黄毅周一在接受《新华社》记者访问时说，这起事故既暴露出信号系统设计上的缺
陷，同时也反映出事故发生后，应急处置不力以及安全管理上存在的漏洞。黄毅重申这
是一起可以避免的事故。

中国高速铁路信号系统是按照欧洲标准由中国自主研发的。�中国通号集团公司�在包
括尚比亚、伊朗和朝鲜在内的至少20个国家拥有合资企业。

《南都》的报导说，�通号集团�作为�高铁大跃进�的直接受益者，2006年利润为
3亿元，营业收入42亿元。2008年，利润为5.6亿元，营业收入为62.1亿元。2010年，公
司利润和营业收入翻两番，利润为12.6亿元，营业收入达到120.5亿元。

�通号集团�在深圳有两个重要的轨道交通项目，一是广深港客运专线，一个是地铁
2、3号线的信号专案。根据�通号集团�官网公布的信息显示，深圳地铁2号线由�中
国通号�承担总体安装，3号线由�中国通号济南有限公司�参与建设。

新唐人记者 秦雪 萧宇 采访报导

Wenzhou Train Crash & Ma Cheng's Death

The morning of Aug. 22, when the Wenzhou train crashinspection team arrived
at the China NationalRailway Signal & Communication Corporation (CRSC),the
company's president Ma Cheng died of a heart attack.Public opinion
generally believes that Ma Cheng collapsedunder the excessive
pressure.Before that day, the corporation's affiliated company,Beijing
National Railway Research & Design Instituteof Signal &
Communication(CRSCD), said in a statementthat it was willing to take
responsibility for the crash.

A Caixin.com report quoted the words of Ma Cheng's friend

that Ma Cheng, age 55, had no previous history of heartproblems, but was
diagnosed with a sudden heart attack.A Southern Metropolitan Daily
journalist went to the hospitalto see the death records but was
rejected.The doctor in charge said, "We only can say thatthe cause of death
announced on TV is correct."Ma Cheng, the CRSC's ex-general manger was
appointedpresident after the company's restructuring in late 2010.It is
understood that a major cause of the 7.23 train crashwas due to program
logic errors of the data acquisition board.The train control center was
thus unable to receivereal-time correct data and send the correct
commands.CRSC is the train control equipment supplier of the saidaccident
line.Its affiliated company CRSCD is responsiblefor the software design,
and became the target ofpublic criticism after the Wenzhou crash accident.

Guangzhou Daily reported that after the 7.23 train crashCRSC postponed its
plan to list its stocks on an exchange.21st Century Business Herald
revealed that all of CRSC'semployees had been questionedby the State
Council investigation teamand "Ma Cheng was also called for
inquiries."National Business Daily quoted the words ofWang Mengshu, an
accident inspection expert:"There was something wrong with the signal,but
it unlikely went so far to cause the rear-end accident."Wang said
meaningfully that the cause of 7.23 train crashdefinitely "has more to do
with management problemsthan with technical problems."

Beijing-based scholar Peng Dingdingexpressed his sympathy for Ma Cheng's
death.Peng Dingding (Beijing-based scholar):If I were him, I wouldn't be so
nervous.As I've said many times in regards to the accident,the point is not
to focus on the causesbut on the contingency plan. Why wasn't it applied
then?

Wall Street Journal reported thatthe Chinese authorities said this week
thatthe preliminary investigation's results had come outand would be
announced before the middle of September.Huang Yi, spokesman for the State
Production SafetySupervision & Management Office said thatthe inspection
team has finished the initial technical reporton the accident and expert
team's direct cause report.The next step is to identify what caused the
crash.

Huang Yi told the Xinhua News Agency that the accidentexposed not only the
signaling systems' flaws, but also thepoor contingency management and
safety management.He reiterated that this was an avoidable accident.China
railway signal system is independently developedand is in accordance with
European standards.CRSC's subsidiary joint ventures areoperated in at least
20 countriesincluding Zambia, Iran and North Korea.

Southern Metropolitan Daily reported that CRSC is a directbeneficiary of
high-speed railway's Great Leap Forward.In 2006, its profit reached RMB 300
millionwith revenues of RMB 4.2 billion.In 2008, the profit was RMB 560
million withrevenues of RMB 6.21 billion.In 2010, the Corp quadrupled
profit to RMB 1.26 billionand revenues to RMB 12.05 billion.CRSC has
contracted 2 important rail projects in Shenzhen.

One is Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Passenger Linethe other is the signal
project for Subway Line 2 and Line 3CRSC's website said that the CRSC is
responsible forthe overall installation of Shenzhen Subway Line 2,and CRSC
Jinan Engineering Co., Ltd. for Subway Line 3.

NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu 2011-08-26
10:18:03http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/08/26/a579339.html.-【禁闻】动车事
故报告与马骋之死.html