【禁闻】骆家辉清廉做派 中共骂新殖民主义
【新唐人2011年8月31日讯】美国大使骆家辉赴北京上任亮相时的�背包客�清廉形
象,在中国老百姓当中赢得喝采。而中共喉舌媒体《光明日报》网站日前发表一篇评论
文章,把骆家辉的清廉作风称为�美国新殖民主义�,担心美国官员抢走中国人的民
心。评论指出,御用文人在信息开放时代贩卖仇美思想,引来的只能是众人的嘲笑。目
前《光明日报》已经将文章删除。
这篇评论文章题目是�警惕骆家辉带来的新殖民主义�,把矛头直指新上任的美国大
使。文章承认,骆家辉赴任没有随从、没有警卫、没有鲜花和掌声、全家拎着大包小包
抵达北京的平民作风,与众多官僚权贵们的高高在上形成鲜明的对比和讽刺,赢得中国
普通民众的好感。
但是文章又说,�骆家辉给中国的官员们上课绝不是骆家辉的目地,为美国收揽赢得中
国的民心,强化中国民众崇洋媚外的奴性,进而召集民意以壮大美国在中国的支持力
量,藉以分化中国断裂甚至碎裂的意识形态,才是这位华裔大使的如意算盘。�文章声
称:骆家辉华裔的身份使他能够对中国的普通民众产生亲和力,暴露了美国以华治华、
煽动中国政治动乱的卑鄙用心。
原《纽约时报》新闻助理赵岩指出,中共的御用文人,不自觉的总是把美国和现代文明
社会当做自己的敌人。不断的给自己制造恐慌。
赵岩:人家一切东西都是坏的,你的那些豪华奢侈的楼堂馆所,那才是好的吗?那不就
是宁要社会主义的草,不要资本主义的苗,毛泽东思想,文革思想的再翻版吗?�
赵岩指出,中共从毛泽东时代开始,就一直把美国视为最大的假想敌,尽管美国在二战
期间慷慨解囊的支持中国人民的抗战,尽管美国把�庚子赔款�全部留在中国建立了�
清华大学�。
赵岩:�从1950年抗美援朝开始,他就把美国当成最大的敌人。因为他清楚,当一个民
主制度在一个国家国土上落实的时候,他这种专制,他这种残酷的暴政,必然是实行不
下去的。那么为了欺骗人民怎么办?他就要想出一个假想敌。�
大陆文化评论家叶匡政指出,中共对美国的抗拒,就是独裁对民主的恐惧。
叶匡政:�因为其实美国很多作为对很多极权社会确实是一种根本性的颠覆。无论是从
思想,从行为,还是从价值上,都是一种颠覆。所以极权社会极权国家的理论家,对这
种行为或这种意识,表现出反抗和抗拒或非常恐惧的心态。�
而御用文人为了给中共的独裁统治寻找藉口,不惜指鹿为马,黑白颠倒。
北京宪政学者陈永苗指出,中共仇美实质上是对西方民主宪政的抗拒。
陈永苗:�他说来说去还是想阻挡宪政的潮流,这个民主化的潮流。因为现在最大的问
题要求宪政的话,那最大的启迪当然还是来自西方。所以他说来说去还是想拦住对宪政
化的潮流。所以他就在煽动极端民族主义的情绪,来服务于他的统治。�
骆家辉和拜登的清廉作风与中共官员的奢华作风形成鲜明对比,好像把中共专制的丑陋
放在阳光之下暴晒。《光明日报》网站的这篇署名文章也发出哀叹:�如果中国共产党
不能主动自觉清除官僚主义的病毒以确保自己机体的健康,如果中国共产党不能自己将
党和官分开以整顿吏治收复民心,那就等着骆家辉掳走我们的民心和民意再反过来给我
们自己动手术吧!�
赵岩:�如果他们不能从拜登和骆家辉的身上看到真正的政府官员应该是怎样的以身作
则,来建立廉洁政府的形象的话,那么早晚中共或者说中国(共)政府会因为腐败而走
向没落和灭亡,这个不因他的经济发展而决定。我们已经看到了,卡扎菲和穆巴拉克都
因为自己的腐败而丧失了自己的政权。�
《法国国际广播电台》的评论文章说,如果从投资与回报的比率来评估的话,拜登的�
炸酱面午餐�的宣传效果,要比《新华社》耗资千万在美国纽约�时代广场�打广
告,不知要好上多少倍。一位副总统的一顿便饭,和一个新大使的轻装到任,就淋漓尽
致的展现了他的国家形象,且魅力无穷。
新唐人记者秦雪、萧宇采访报导。====
Locke Tagged "Neo-colonialist"
U.S. Ambassador to Beijing Gary Locke's "backpacker"debut shows his
rectitude, wining Chinese people's acclaim.However, Guangming Daily,
Chinese Communist Party's(CCP) mouthpiece media, denounces on its
websiteLocke's style as "American neo-colonialism." It expressesworry that
U.S. officials will win over Chinese people's heart.Comments say that
Guangming Daily tries to instigateanti-American sentiment in the age of
open information.That will only bring ridicule. Later, Guangming
Dailyremoved the article from its website.
Entitled "Beware Of Locke's Neo�colonialism," the articledirects its attack
to the new American ambassador.It admits, Locke brought no followers to his
post, no guards,no flowers or applause, but only his family with large
bags.This conduct is in sharp contrast to the Chinese bureaucrats,winning
the acclaim of many ordinary Chinese people.At the same time the article
says, "Locke is not tryingto educate Chinese officials, but to win over
Chinese people,to strengthen Chinese people's fawning servility,and to
break up China's ideology."The article claims, "Locke's performance of
incorruptibility isa despicable intention of instigating political unrest
in China."Former New York Times news assistant Zhao Yan said,
CCP's hack writers always make an enemy of Americaand the modern civilized
society.They keep seeking to instill panic in Chinese readers.
Zhao Yan: "If anything that belongs to others is bad, howabout your (CCP's)
luxury office buildings and mansions?Isn't that a replication of Maoismfrom
the Cultural Revolution?"Zhao pointed out that communist China has
regardedAmerica as the greatest enemy from the Mao era.But in fact America
provided generous support to Chinaduring World War II.And back in history,
it returned all the Boxer Indemnityto China to fund the establishment of
Tsinghua University.Zhao Yan: "Ever since the Korean War in 1950s,CCP has
depicted the United States as the biggest enemy,because it knows that if a
democratic system is establishedin China, its tyranny will come to an
end.That is how they deceive Chinese peoplewith America as an enemy."
China's cultural critic Ye Kuangzheng pointed out that CCP'santi-U.S.
sentiment originates from its fear of democracy.Ye: "America indeed has
undermining power against manytotalitarian regimes in terms of thinking,
behavior and values.So totalitarian states show great resistance and
feartoward America's value system and social institutions."CCP's hack
writers, however, spare no effortin distorting facts to legitimatize CCP's
rule.Beijing constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao pointed outthat CCP's
anti-American sentimentis actually a resistance towardthe Western
constitutional democracy.
Chen Yongmiao: "Whatever it (CCP) says, it just wantsto block the trend of
constitutional government,the trend of democratization. The West
providesthe best examples of constitutional democracy,so CCP just tries to
counteract the West's influence.It incites extreme nationalist sentiments
to serve its rule."Locke and Biden's style of incorruptibility is in sharp
contrastto the luxurious style of Chinese officials.It is an exposure of
the ugly communists' dictatorship face.
Even the Guangming Daily article lamented:"If CCP cannot take the
initiative to consciously removethe virus in its bureaucracy,if CCP cannot
separate itself from the government,it can only watch Locke winning Chinese
people's hearts!"Zhao Yan: "If they (CCP) cannot learn incorruptibility
fromBiden and Locke on how an official should perform his duty,CCP will
sooner or later decline because of corruption.This cannot be saved by
economic development.We have seen that both Gaddafi and Mubarak have
losttheir political power because of corruption."
Radio France Internationale' review article said that Biden's"noodle lunch"
produced way better advertisement effectthan Xinhua News Agency's "Times
Square show" billboardfor CCP's image, which costs over US$10 million.A
simple meal of a vice presidentand a simple inauguration of a new
ambassadorcan vividly demonstrate a country's true valuesand win people's
hearts.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu. 2011-08-31
11:36:03http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/08/31/a581556.html.-【禁闻】骆家辉
清廉做派-中共骂新殖民主义.html
没有评论:
发表评论