【禁闻】前中国驻利大使赞卡扎菲 遭声讨

【禁闻】前中国驻利大使赞卡扎菲 遭声讨

【新唐人2011年4月4日讯】前中共驻利比亚大使王厚立撰写的一篇：为利比亚独裁者卡
扎菲唱赞歌的文章，近来在网上引来炮轰，网友质问：既然卡扎菲如此好，那为什么要
用血腥的手段去镇压民众呢？为什么杀人魔王都是中共的好朋友呢？香港媒体则撰
文，深入分析了中共对卡扎菲的立场和矛盾心理。

这篇原来刊载在大陆官方媒体《世界新闻报》的文章，是由1989年出任中共驻利比亚大
使的王厚立撰写的，文中回忆了他作为大使多次被卡扎菲单独接见、获得特殊「礼遇」
的往事。王厚立将文章命名为《真实的卡扎菲》，但因为文章刻意为卡扎菲涂脂抹
粉，在网络上曝光后，立即受到网民的声讨。

《网易》网友指出，这位大使是选择性失明，对卡扎菲的恶行视而不见，一味的为他开
脱罪行。

网友质问，「真是令人百思不得其解，为什么那些独裁者和杀人魔王都是你（中共）的
好朋友呢？是惺惺相惜，还是臭味相投？」

也有网友反问，既然卡扎菲如此好，难道利比亚人民真是瞎了眼睛，去上街示威游行干
什么？既然卡扎菲如此关心民间疾苦，那还犯得着用血腥的手段去镇压 民众吗？

此前，《新纪元》杂志比较了卡扎菲与中共政权，得出的结论是：两者相似程度极高。
文章谈到，当卡扎菲说出：「中国（共）政府在六四时也用坦克对付示威人群」时，人
们才恍然大悟：原来，这位利比亚狂人正是在效仿中共，两者竟有如此多的相似之处。

但是，中共在安理会上，并没有否决对卡扎菲的制裁决议。对此，香港《苹果日报》指
出，中共这样做，主要是顾及名声与提升国际地位；但又担心多国关注人权，终有一天
会闹到自己头上，中共陷入两难境地。

这篇名为《中共扭扭捏捏撑老朋友卡扎菲》的报导指出，对利比亚狂人卡扎菲，中共是
又爱又恨，但以爱为主，恨只是恨铁不成钢，恨他控制不住局势。官媒对利比亚局势的
报导「扭扭捏捏」，立场貌似公正而实则偏向卡扎菲。

文中透露，3月26号，央视为了支持卡扎菲，竟将利比亚民众欢迎联军，举出「法国万
岁」（Vive le France）标语的画面，解说成民众集会支持卡扎菲。

一直以来，大陆官媒总是强调「不干涉内政」「不干涉主权」，来批评多国对卡扎菲政
权的制裁。但民众有不同的想法。《法国国际广播电台》特意对《凯迪》网站论坛登出
的部分有关「人权与主权」的讨论做了整理。

网友「冷眼观世」写道：有人说，英美法干涉了利比亚内政。这样的指责是虚伪无知
的。利比亚是谁的利比亚？是暴君卡扎菲的利比亚？还是人民的利比亚？当然是后者
的。

有网友跟帖说：主权不是挡箭牌，内政不是遮羞布。

一篇来自《网易》的转贴则指出，在当代国际关系中，主权让位已成常态，所谓的「不
干涉原则」已经逐渐溶解。贴文最后说：「主权神圣，但它并不比人权更高；主权唯
一，但它并不为特定政权所有。无论用什么手段，保护利比亚平民免遭独裁者的蹂
躏，比维护一个屡屡作恶的政权重要得多。」

另外，法国《世界报》报导，中共在利比亚有将近75家企业，总投资高达200亿美元。

新唐人记者李谦、周天综合报导。

"Internal Affairs Are Not a Fig Leaf"

Wang Houli, a former Chinese ambassador in Libyawrote an article to praise
Libyan dictator Gaddafi,causing denouncing online. Netizens questioned,if
Gaddafi is right, why will he brutally suppresshis people? Why all mass
murderers happen to befriends of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?HK media
published in-depth analysison the CCP's stand and ambivalence to Gaddafi.

The original article was published in China's officialmedia, News of the
World, written by Wang Houli,who was assigned a Chinese ambassador to
Libyain 1989. In the article, Wang recalled his manyprivate meetings with
Gaddafi and accessto special "courtesies". Wang titled the article"A True
Gaddafi",and deliberately whitewashedthe Libyan leader. However once
published onlineit was immediately denounced by netizens.

Netizens on Netease commented thatthis ambassador was blind on choices,and
could not see the evils of Gaddafi,but arbitrarily justified Gaddafi's
crimes.

A netizen said, "I am really confused, why are thosedictators and mass
murderers all your (CCP) friends?Is this being sympathetic, or being
like-minded?"

Another netizen wrote that if Gaddafi is so good,isn't it too ignorant of
the Libyan peopleto demonstrate on the streets? And if Gaddafiis so
concerned about people's suffering,is it sensible to use bloody repression
on people?

Epoch Weekly compared Gaddafi's and the CCP'sgovernments and concluded that
the twoare very similar. When Gaddafi said, "the CCPalso used tanks to
suppress crowds in 1989",people got the hint that this Libyan despotis
following the example of the CCP,and the two had so many similarities.

But in the United Nations Security Council,the CCP did not veto the
Resolution on sanctionsagainst Gaddafi. HK's Apple Daily pointed out,that
the reason for CCP not vetoing the Resolution,is its concern for its own
international status.CCP is also worried that it can become a target
itselfif many countries show concern for human rights.Therefore the CCP was
facing a dilemma.

The article titled "Communist" Mixed Support toOld Friend Gaddafi' says to
the Libyan tyrant thatthe CCP loves and hates him at the same time,with
mostly loving him but the hate preventing themfrom turning the iron into
steel and from being ableto control the situation. China's official
mediahave published mixed reports on Libya's situation,and seemingly just,
they are partial to Gaddafi.

The article also revealed on March 26, that CCTVexplained the scenes of
Libyans welcomingWestern Allies with banners "Vive le France"as being in
support of Gaddafi.

All along, the mainland official media have alwaysemphasized
the "non-interference of internal affairs"and "non-interference in
sovereignty" to criticizemultinational sanctions against Gaddafi's
regime.But people have different views. Radio FranceInternationale has
specially posted discussionson "human rights and sovereignty" on "Cadillac".

Netizen "Cold view of the world" wrote thatsome say Britain, U.S. and
France have intervenedin Libya's internal affairs, which is false and
ignorant.Who owns Libya? Is it the dictator Gaddafi,or the people?
Apparently it isn't the latter.

A follow up post said, sovereignty is not a shield,and internal affairs are
not a fig leaf.

A post transferred from Netease states thatin current international
affairs, sovereignty yielding(to human rights) is very common, and so
callednon-intervention policy gradually dissolves.Sovereignty is sacred but
is not above human rights;it is sole, but is not owned by a certain
government.Using any methods, the key is to protect Libyansfrom a dictator
than to guard an evil regime.

Le Monde reported that the CCPowned about 75 businesses in Libya,and its
total capital there is up to USD20 billion.

NTD reporters Li Qian and Zhou Tian 2011-04-04
10:45:45http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/04/04/a514279.html.-【禁闻】前中国
驻利大使赞卡扎菲-遭声讨.html