【禁闻】药家鑫判死刑 民意“胜利”或正常

【禁闻】药家鑫判死刑 民意"胜利"或正常

【新唐人2011年4月23日讯】大学生药家鑫去年驾车撞倒一名机车骑士，不但没有将被
害人送医，反而拿出尖刀刺死被害人，西安市法院22号判处药家鑫死刑。有评论者认为
这是「民意的胜利」，也有人指出，这是正常的法律判决。一个普通的案件却激起舆论
激辩，学者认为，这反映出社会的不正常，下面听听大家的想法。

西安音乐学院大三学生药家鑫被判「故意杀人罪」，处以死刑。并赔偿被害人家属四万
五千多元。

北京宪政学者陈永苗认为这是「一次民意的胜利」。在此之前，中央电视台，公安大学
教授等为药家鑫的辩护，令民众隐约感到法律将再次向特权阶层倾斜，因而爆发了舆论
的大论战。

中国天网人权事务中心义工蒲飞认为，这个案件的判决，并非法制的胜利，而只是法制
的正常。一个健康的国家法制不需要胜利，只需要正常。

大陆诗人，文化学者叶匡政也认为，这样一个事实清楚的杀人案件，却成为舆论和媒体
讨论的热点话题，其实反映出社会的不正常。大家都在就某个事件，来表达对法律的怀
疑和对政府的怀疑。另外，许多更加重大的话题却不被允许讨论。

叶匡政：「我更关心的是，为什么这一类根本不值得争议的事情，何以会成为我们大家
不断讨论的一个案件？其实他是来源于我们目前，无论是媒体也好，由于政府的言论管
制空间越来越大，导致媒体涉及的公共议题的空间也越来越小...我觉得民众的争议是
出自于对当下法律的这种，可以讲法律的公正或法律正义性的怀疑。」

虽然这个判决给了受害人和法律平等的一个交代。但是这个案件背后的社会因素却令人
反省。一个大学生，为何如此没有道德底线，如此残忍的杀人，在交通肇事后想到的不
是救人，而是杀人灭口。背后究竟是什么样的社会思潮和教育理念造成了他残忍的行
为？

陈永苗认为，问题和教育没有关系，而是与中国现有的政治体制形成的特权意识有关。
「药家鑫案」成为中国阶级矛盾和政治矛盾，不可调和的一个标志。

陈永苗：「你就可以轻易看到，官二代，富二代，军二代以及他们的父母，实际上不把
自己当作一个人，也不把弱势者，受害者当作一个人，他没有一个正常的人的理智理
性，来交往来形成关系。实际上他把自己当做神或当作一个特权者，然后他把民众看作
一个蝼蚁，或者不值得认真对待的一群动物。他不是一个教育问题，而是一个特权意识
形成的阶级仇恨问题。」

3月23号药家鑫故意杀人案开庭审理时，药家鑫的律师曾经以「激情杀人」为他辩护。
法官在判决后接受媒体采访时表示，「激情杀人」一般是指由于被害人的不当言行，引
起被告人的激愤，而实施杀害被害人的行为。而药家鑫是在开车撞到被害人后，为逃避
法律责任�行「杀人灭口」行为，不属于「激情杀人」。

药家鑫去年10月20号深夜，在探访女友回家的路上，开车撞倒26岁的张妙，因为担心张
妙记下自己的脸及车牌，药家鑫再砍张妙8刀后逃逸，但他后来又连撞2人，被人围堵抓
到。不过，这个案子从事发到审理，拖了5个月才开庭，六个月后判决。

新唐人记者秦雪、吴慧真采访报导。

An Ordinary Case in an Abnormal Society

After a university student hit a motorcyclist in 2010,instead of taking the
victim to a hospital,he stabbed the victim to death.He received a death
penalty on April 22, 2011.This ordinary case provoked heated debates.Some
believe this reflects that the society is abnormal.

Yao Jiaxin, a junior at Xi'an Conservatory of Music,was sentenced to death
for "intentional homicide".He will pay RMB 45,000 to the victim's family.

Beijing constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao thinksthat this is a "victory
for public opinions".Before his trial, the government's mouthpiece CCTVand
some professors had come to Yao's defense.People felt that the law favored
the privileged class.A huge public controversy soon followed.

Pu Fei, a volunteer at China's rights org SkyNet,believes that the verdict
reflects a normal legal system,which needs proper functioning, not
victories.

Poet and scholar Ye Kuangzheng believes thatwhen a clear-cut case becomes a
controversial topic,it reflects an abnormal society.People take an incident
to express their suspicionstowards the legal system and the
government.Also, discussions of many serious topics are not allowed.

Ye: I'm more concerned about why a trivial thing hasturned into a
controversy with continued discussions?It is due to worsening speech
control by authorities.With a tighter control, there are fewer debatable
topics.Debates stem from the public's suspicions of the law.

Although the verdict reflects the legal equality,but the underlying social
factors call for introspection.Why does a college student have no moral
base line?After the accident, he didn't think of saving the victim,but to
silence the victim by killing her.What kind of social mentality and
educationhas molded him to behave like that?

Chen believes, the issue has little to do with educationbut due to the
unique privilege consciousnessand the political system in China.Yao's case
marks the unsolvable class conflictsand political conflicts in China.

Chen: You can easily tell that the second generationsof the officials, the
rich and the military officialsdon't treat the powerless or victims as
people.They have no normal rationale to bond with others.They see
themselves as almighty and privileged.They treat the masses as ants or
animals.It is not a matter of education but class hatredformed within the
privileged minds.

On his trial held on March 23, Yao's lawyer madea "passion killing"
argument in his defense.In an interview after the trial, the judge
said,"Passion killing is due to the victim's improper behaviorprovoking the
defendant to carry out the crime.However, Yao intentionally killed the
victimto avoid legal liability. It is not passion killing."

Yao was on his way home after visiting his girlfriendOn October 20, 2010,
when he hit Zhang Miao, 26.Yao was afraid that Zhang would remember his
faceand his license plate number. So he stabbed her 8 times.When escaping
from the scene, he hit 2 more peopleand was stopped by people and was
arrested.It took 6 months for the verdict to be delivered.

NTD reporters Qin Xue and Wu Huizhen。 2011-04-23
10:44:41http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/gb/2011/04/23/a522524.html.-【禁闻】药家鑫
判死刑-民意"胜利"或正常.html